SpringerLink
Log in

Adoption of sustainable construction for small contractors: major barriers and best solutions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been numerous studies on the adoption of sustainable construction; however, few have attempted to analyze the sustainable construction adoption from the perspective of small contractors. The objectives of this study are to investigate the major barriers that prevent small contractors from adopting sustainable construction and to propose a group of best solutions that can overcome these barriers. To achieve these goals, a comprehensive literature review was conducted first. Then, data from 30 Singapore-based small contractors were collected through a questionnaire for analysis. Results reported that “extra investment required,” “slow recovery of investment,” “lack of incentives,” “limited knowledge on sustainable construction,” “tendency to maintain current practices,” and “lack of demands from clients” were the top six barriers that hinder small contractors from adopting sustainable construction. Results also revealed that three barrier categories, namely “financial barriers,” “management barriers,” and “knowledge barriers,” were more critical to small contractors than to large contractors. Lastly, five best solutions that could help small contractors overcome the identified barriers were suggested. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by investigating the barriers and solutions for small contractors in adopting sustainable construction. The findings from this study are helpful to the industry practitioners as well, as they can enhance their understandings of the barriers and can also help policy makers to come up with more effective policies to tackle these barriers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn YH, Pearce AR, Wang Y, Wang G (2013) Drivers and barriers of sustainable design and construction: the perception of green building experience. Int J Sustain Build Technol Urban Dev 4:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ametepey O, Aigbavboa C, Ansah K (2015) Barriers to successful implementation of sustainable construction in the Ghanaian construction industry. Procedia Manufac 3:1682–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asante J, Kissi E, Badu E (2018) Factorial analysis of capacity-building needs of small- and medium-scale building contractors in develo** countries: Ghana as a case study. Benchmarking Int J 25:357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banihashemi S, Hosseini MR, Golizadeh H, Sankaran S (2017) Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in develo** countries. Int J Project Manag 35:1103–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bca S (2014) 3rd green building masterplan. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • BCA (2015a) Home-technology-BCA green mark scheme-enhanced SGD 20 million green mark incentive scheme for new buildings (GMIS-NB) [Online]. http://www.bca.gov.sg/greenmark/gmis.html. Accessed 5 Apr 2016

  • BCA (2015b) Home-technology-BCA green mark scheme-SGD 100 million green mark incentive scheme for existing buildings (BMIS-EB). Building and Construction Authority. https://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/gmiseb.html. Accessed 5 Apr 2016

  • BCA (2017a) BCA Contractors Registration System (CRS) [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/ContractorsRegistry/others/CRS_FAQ.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2017

  • BCA (2017b) BCA directory of registered contractors and licensed builders [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/BCADirectory/Classification/Details/128. Accessed 17 Dec 2017

  • BCA (2017c) BCA green mark assessment criteria and online application [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/green_mark_criteria.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2017

  • BCA (2017d) Construction productivity and capability fund [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/CPCF/cpcf.html. Accessed 4 May 2018

  • BCA (2017e) Enhanced $20 million green mark incentive scheme for new buildings [Online]. Available: https://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/gmis.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

  • BCA (2017f) Legislation on environmental sustainability for buildings [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/EnvSusLegislation/Environmental_Sustainability_Legislation.html. Accessed 5 May 2018

  • BCA (2017g) Specific registration requirements for construction workhead [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/ContractorsRegistry/others/Registration_CW.pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2017

  • BCA (2018a) $100 million green mark incentive scheme for existing buildings [Online]. Available: https://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/gmiseb.html [Accessed 11 April 2018]

  • BCA (2018b) Building retrofit energy efficiency financing (BREEF) scheme [Online]. https://www.bca.gov.sg/GreenMark/breef.html. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

  • Bon R, Hutchinson K (2000) Sustainable construction: some economic challenges. Build Res Inf 28:310–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan APC, Darko A, Ameyaw EE, Owusu-Manu D-G (2017) Barriers affecting the adoption of green building technologies. J Manag Eng 33:04016057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan APC, Darko A, Olanipekun AO, Ameyaw EE (2018) Critical barriers to green building technologies adoption in develo** countries: the case of Ghana. J Clean Prod 172:1067–1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew K (2010) Singapore’s strategies towards sustainable construction. IES J Part A Civ Struct Eng 3:196–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong HY, Wang X (2016) The outlook of building information modeling for sustainable development. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:1877–1887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou YM, Polansky AM, Mason RL (1998) Transforming non-normal data to normality in statistical process control. J Qual Technol 30:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darko A, Chan APC (2017a) Review of barriers to green building adoption. Sustain Dev 25:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darko A, Chan APC (2017b) Strategies to promote green building technologies adoption in develo** countries: the case of Ghana. Build Environ 130:74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darko A, Chan APC, Ameyaw EE, He B-J, Olanipekun AO (2017) Examining issues influencing green building technologies adoption: the United States green building experts’ perspectives. Energy Build 144:320–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding G, Forsythe PJ (2013) Sustainable construction: life cycle energy analysis of construction on slo** sites for residential buildings. Constr Manag Econ 31:254–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djokoto SD, Dadzie J, Ohemeng-Ababio E (2014) Barriers to sustainable construction in the Ghanaian construction industry: consultants perspectives. J Sustain Dev 7:134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson DW, Sourani A, Sertyesilisik B, Tunstall A (2013) Sustainable construction: analysis of its costs and benefits. Am J Civ Eng Arch 1:32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • du Plessis C (2007) A strategic framework for sustainable construction in develo** countries. Constr Manag Econ 25:67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) Key figures on European business with a special feature on SMEs [Online]. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3930297/5967534/KS-ET-11-001-EN.PDF/81dfdd85-c028-41f9-bbf0-a9d8ef5134c5. Accessed 19 Dec 2017

  • Gambo N, Said I, Ismail R (2016) Comparing the levels of performance of small scale local government contractors in Northern Nigeria with international practice. Eng Constr Arch Manag 23:588–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan X, Zuo J, Ye K, Skitmore M, **ong B (2015) Why sustainable construction? Why not? An owner’s perspective. Habitat International 47:61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häkkinen T, Belloni K (2011) Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Build Res Inf 39:239–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RC, Bowen PA (1997) Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment. Constr Manag Econ 15:223–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway S, Parrish K (2015) The contractor’s role in the sustainable construction industry. Proc Inst Civ Eng Eng Sustain 168:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang B-G, Tan JS (2012) Green building project management: obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustain Dev 20:335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang BG, Zhao X, See YL, Zhong Y (2015) Addressing risks in green retrofit projects: the case of Singapore. Project Manag J 46:76–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang B-G, Shan M, Phua H, Chi S (2017a) An exploratory analysis of risks in green residential building construction projects: the case of Singapore. Sustainability 9:1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang B-G, Shan M, Phuah SL (2017b) Safety in green building construction projects in Singapore: performance, critical issues, and improvement solutions. KSCE J Civ Eng 22:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang B-G, Zhu L, Tan Joanne Siow H (2017c) Identifying critical success factors for green business parks: case study of Singapore. J Manag Eng 33:04017023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang B-G, Shan M, Looi K-Y (2018) Key constraints and mitigation strategies for prefabricated prefinished volumetric construction. J Clean Prod 183:183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kibert CJ (2007) The next generation of sustainable construction. Build Res Inf 35:595–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TK (2015) T test as a parametric statistic. Korean J Anesthesiol 68:540–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Y, Shan M, Chan APC, Hu Y (2014) Overview of corruption research in construction. J Manag Eng 30:02514001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YY, Chen P-H, Chew DAS, Teo CC, Ding RG (2011) Critical project management factors of AEC firms for delivering green building projects in Singapore. J Constr Eng Manag 137:1153–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li AS, Ling FYY, Low SP, Ofori G (2015) Strategies for foreign construction-related consultancy firms to improve performance in China. J Manag Eng 32:06015001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low SP, Gao S, Tay WL (2014) Comparative study of project management and critical success factors of greening new and existing buildings in Singapore. Struct Surv 32:413–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu S-L, Sexton MG, Abbot C (2008) Key characteristics of small construction firms: a United Kingdom perspective. In: Proceedings: CIBW065/055 joint international symposium: transformation through construction, 2008

  • Luu VT, Kim S-Y, Huynh T-A (2008) Improving project management performance of large contractors using benchmarking approach. Int J Proj Manag 26:758–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manoliadis O, Tsolas I, Nakou A (2006) Sustainable construction and drivers of change in Greece: a Delphi study. Constr Manag Econ 24:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskil-Leitan R, Reychav I (2018) A sustainable sociocultural combination of building information modeling with integrated project delivery in a social network perspective. Clean Technol Environ Policy 20:1017–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyatake Y (1996) Technology development and sustainable construction. J Manag Eng 12:23–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulva S (2017) JCEM and CII: advancing civilization. J Constr Eng Manag 143:02517012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng JS (2017) Small contractors still resistant to change [Online]. http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/manpower/small-contractors-still-resistant-to-change. Accessed 11 Apr 2018

  • Nguyen H-T, Skitmore M, Gray M, Zhang X, Olanipekun AO (2017) Will green building development take off? An exploratory study of barriers to green building in Vietnam. Resour Conserv Recycl 127:8–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norušis MJ (2006) SPSS 14.0 guide to data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofori G (1998) Sustainable construction: principles and a framework for attainment-comment. Constr Manag Econ 16:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt M, Tucker M, Riley M, Longden J (2009) Towards sustainable construction: promotion and best practices. Constr Innov 9:201–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reychav I, Maskil Leitan R, Mchaney R (2017) Sociocultural sustainability in green building information modeling. Clean Technol Environ Policy 19:2245–2254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts AC, Christopoulos GI, Car J, Soh C-K, Lu M (2016) Psycho-biological factors associated with underground spaces: what can the new era of cognitive neuroscience offer to their study? Tunn Undergr Space Technol 55:118–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robichaud LB, Anantatmula VS (2010) Greening project management practices for sustainable construction. J Manag Eng 27:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruparathna R, Hewage K (2015) Sustainable procurement in the Canadian construction industry: challenges and benefits. Can J Civ Eng 42:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh MS, Alalouch C (2015) Towards sustainable construction in Oman: challenges and opportunities. Procedia Eng 118:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serpell A, Kort J, Vera S (2013) Awareness, actions, drivers and barriers of sustainable construction in Chile. Technol Econ Dev Econ 19:272–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan M, Hwang B-G (2018) Green building rating systems: global reviews of practices and research efforts. Sustain Cities Soc 39:172–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan M, Hwang B-G, Wong KSN (2017a) A preliminary investigation of underground residential buildings: advantages, disadvantages, and critical risks. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 70:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shan M, Hwang B-G, Zhu L (2017b) A global review of sustainable construction project financing: policies, practices, and research efforts. Sustainability 9:2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen L, Shuai C, Jiao L, Tan Y, Song X (2016) A global perspective on the sustainable performance of urbanization. Sustainability 8:783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen W, Tang W, Siripanan A, Lei Z, Duffield CF, Wilson D, Hui FKP, Wei Y (2017) Critical success factors in Thailand’s green building industry. J Asian Arch Build Eng 16:317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi Q, Zuo J, Huang R, Huang J, Pullen S (2013) Identifying the critical factors for green construction–an empirical study in China. Habitat Int 40:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Business Review (2011) Govt sets new parameters to define SMEs [Online]. http://sbr.com.sg/retail/more-news/govt-sets-new-parameters-define-smes. Accessed 19 Dec 2017

  • Siniavskaia N (2015) Most homebuilders are small businesses [Online]. http://eyeonhousing.org/2015/12/most-homebuilders-are-small-businesses/. Accessed 21 June 2018

  • Tan Y, Shen L, Yao H (2011) Sustainable construction practice and contractors’ competitiveness: a preliminary study. Habitat Int 35:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thas O, Rayner J, Best D (2005) Tests for symmetry based on the one-sample Wilcoxon signed rank statistic. Commun Stat Simul Comput 34:957–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tixier AJ-P, Hallowell MR, Albert A, van Boven L, Kleiner BM (2014) Psychological antecedents of risk-taking behavior in construction. J Constr Eng Manag 140:04014052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner AG (2003) Sampling strategies [Online]. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/meetings/egm/sampling_1203/docs/no_2.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2018

  • U.S. Small Business Administration, USA (2017) Summary of size standards by industry sector [Online]. https://www.sba.gov/contracting/getting-started-contractor/make-sure-you-meet-sba-size-standards/summary-size-standards-industry-sector. Accessed 19 Dec 2017

  • van Bueren EM, Priemus H (2002) Institutional barriers to sustainable construction. Environ Plan 29:75–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villasenor Alva JA, Estrada EG (2009) A generalization of Shapiro–Wilk’s test for multivariate normality. Commun Stat Theory Methods 38:1870–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong SY, Ng JS (2017) Construction industry faces tough times [Online]. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/construction-industry-faces-tough-times. Accessed 4 May 2018

  • Wu P, Low SP, Liu JY, Pienaar J, **a B (2014a) Critical success factors in distance learning construction programs at Central Queensland University: students’ perspective. J Prof Issues Eng Educ Pract 141:05014003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu P, **a B, Pienaar J, Zhao X (2014b) The past, present and future of carbon labelling for construction materials – A review. Build Environ 77:160–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **a B, **ong B, Skitmore M, Wu P, Hu F (2015) Investigating the impact of project definition clarity on project performance: structural equation modeling study. J Manag Eng 32:04015022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeheyis M, Hewage K, Alam MS, Eskicioglu C, Sadiq R (2013) An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability. Clean Technol Environ Policy 15:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu T, Shi Q, Zuo J, Chen R (2017) Critical factors for implementing sustainable construction practice in HOPSCA projects: a case study in China. Sustain Cities Soc 37:93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X (2017) A scientometric review of global BIM research: analysis and visualization. Autom Constr 80:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Hwang B-G, Gao Y (2016) A fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for risk assessment: a case of Singapore’s green projects. J Clean Prod 115:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann M, Althaus H-J, Haas A (2005) Benchmarks for sustainable construction: a contribution to develop a standard. Energy Build 37:1147–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Building, National University of Singapore, 4 Architecture Drive, Singapore, 117566, Singapore

    Bon-Gang Hwang

  2. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, 68 South Shaoshan Road, Changsha, 410004, China

    Ming Shan

  3. Frasers Centrepoint Limited, 438 Alexandra Road, Alexandra Point, Singapore, 119958, Singapore

    Jun-Ming Lye

Authors
  1. Bon-Gang Hwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming Shan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun-Ming Lye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ming Shan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, BG., Shan, M. & Lye, JM. Adoption of sustainable construction for small contractors: major barriers and best solutions. Clean Techn Environ Policy 20, 2223–2237 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1598-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1598-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation