Abstract
It is widely accepted that residual soils (RSs) form very differently from sedimentary soils. While there have been extensive advances regarding sedimentary soil, little is known about the strain stiffness decay in RS. This study considers granite residual soil (GRS) from Taishan in China, where stiffness behaviors are established using in situ and laboratory investigations. Variability in the soil stiffness is due to its current state, including the depth, test method, and strain. This is established via systematic resonant-column and in situ tests. In situ tests include the seismic dilatometer Marchetti test (SDMT) and the self-boring pressuremeter test (SBPT). The degree of weathering of the test soil varies significantly along the depth direction, and the top layer of the soil has a hardening shell due to severe weathering. The laboratory G-γ decay curves of GRS were determined from the resonant column. A comparison of the shear modulus (from SBPT) obtained by different analysis methods gives the shear modulus from nonlinear analyses. An approach is proposed to properly describe the trends in typical in situ G-γ decay curves based on data from the tests. The G-γ curve obtained from the resonant-column test of GRS was compared with the in situ curves. The shear modulus G, as obtained from laboratory tests, is smaller than the curves of the in situ tests, which reflects the processes of sampling, transportation, and preparation of soil specimens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All of the data that support the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
10018–2018 T (2018) Code for in-situ testing of railway engineering geology. In: China Railway Publishing House (in Chinese), p 223P.;A225
Amoroso S, Monaco P, Lehane BM, Marchetti D (2014) Examination of the potential of the seismic dilatometer (SDMT) to estimate in situ stiffness decay curves in various soil types. Soils and Rocks 37(3):177–194
ASTM (2011) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). In: West Conshohocken, Pa
ASTM (2018a) Standard test methods for laboratory determination of density (unit weight) of soil specimens. In: West Conshohocken, Pa
ASTM (2018b) Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils. In: West Conshohocken, Pa
ASTM (2019) Standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass. In: West Conshohocken, Pa
Berisavljević D, Berisavljević Z (2019) Determination of the presence of microstructure in a soil using a seismic dilatometer. Bull Eng Geol Env 78(3):1709–1725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-018-1234-5
Cao Q, Shi J, Chai S, Wang P, Zhang J (2009) Non-linear analysis of stiffness of soils under small strain. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 31(5):699–703. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-4548.2009.05.009 (in Chinese)
Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Maugeri M, Motta E (2013a) An innovative low-cost SDMT marine investigation for the evaluation of the liquefaction potential in the Genova Harbour (Italy). Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization
Cavallaro A, Grasso S, Maugeri M, Motta E (2013b) Site characterisation by in situ and laboratory tests of the sea bed in the Genova Harbour, Italy. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization
Cavallaro A, Lo PDCF, Maugeri M, Pallara O (1999) Caratteristiche di deformabilità dei terreni da prove dilatometriche: analisi critica delle correlazioni esistenti. XX Convegno Nazionale di Geotecnica
Cheng Z, Wang J, Coop MR, Ye G (2020) A miniature triaxial apparatus for investigating the micromechanics of granular soils with in situ X-ray micro-tomography scanning. Front Struct Civ Eng 14(2):357–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-019-0599-2
Clayton CRI, Priest JA, Bui M, Zervos A, Kim SG (2009) The Stokoe resonant column apparatus: effects of stiffness, mass and specimen fixity. Géotechnique 59(5):429–437. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.00096
Cruz N, Cruz J, Rodrigues C, Cruz M, Amoroso S (2018) Behaviour of granitic residual soils assessed by SCPTu and other in-situ tests. 4th International Symposium on Cone Penetration Testing (CPT). Delft Univ Technol, Delft, Netherlands, pp 241–247
da Fonseca AV, Carvalho J, Ferreira C, Costa E, Tuna C, Santos JA (2004) Geotechnical characterization of a residual soil profile: the ISC'2 experimental site, FEUP. In: 2nd International Conference on Site Characterization (ISC-2). Oporto, Portugal, pp 1361–1369
da Fonseca AV, Ferreira C, Saldanha A, Ramos C, Rodrigues C (2018) Comparative analysis of liquefaction susceptibility assessment by CPTu and SPT tests. In: Cone Penetration Testing 2018. CRC Press, pp 669–675
Goh ATC, Zhang RH, Wang W, Wang L, Liu HL, Zhang WG (2020) Numerical study of the effects of groundwater drawdown on ground settlement for excavation in residual soils. Acta Geotech 15(5):1259–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-019-00843-5
Hao D, Chen R, Luan M, Wu K (2011) Research development of estimation for soil properties from SBPT. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics 28(3):452–460 (in Chinese)
Henke R, Henke WK (2002) In situ nonlinear inelastic shearing deformation characteristics of soil deposits inferred using the torsional cylindrical impulse shear test. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92(5):1970–1983
Junaideen SM, Tham LG, Law KT, Dai FC, Lee CF (2010) Behaviour of recompacted residual soils in a constant shear stress path. Can Geotech J 47(6):648–661. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-129
Kiyota T, Maekawa Y, Wu C (2019) Using in-situ and laboratory-measured shear wave velocities to evaluate the influence of soil fabric on in-situ liquefaction resistance. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 117:164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.11.016
Lee IK, Coop MR (1995) The intrinsic behaviour of a decomposed granite soil. Géotechnique 45(1):117–130. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1995.45.1.117
Leroueil S, Vaughan PR (1990) The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks. Géotechnique 40(3):467–488. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.467
Li C, Kong L, Shu R, An R, Zhang X (2020) Disintegration characteristics in granite residual soil and their relationship with the collapsing gully in South China. Open Geosciences 12(1):1116–1126. https://doi.org/10.1515/geo-2020-0178
Liang S, Fang C, Niu J, Zeng W (2019) Research on effect of microbial induced calcite precipitation adopting different calcium sources on cemente granite residual soil. Industrial Construction 49(7):102–107. https://doi.org/10.13204/j.gyjz201907016
Liu X, Zhang X, Kong L, An R, Xu G (2021a) Effect of inherent anisotropy on the strength of natural granite residual soil under generalized stress paths. Acta Geotech 16(12):3793–3812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-021-01393-5
Liu X, Zhang X, Kong L, Li X, Wang G (2021b) Effect of cementation on the small-strain stiffness of granite residual soil. Soils Found 61(2):520–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2021.02.001
Liu X, Zhang X, Kong L, Yin S, Xu Y (2022) Shear strength anisotropy of natural granite residual soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 148(1):04021168. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002709
Luan S, Wang F, Wang T, Lu Z (2018) Shui W (2018) Characteristics of gravelly granite residual soil in bored pile design: an in situ test in Shenzhen. Adv Mater Sci Eng 1:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7598154
Macari EJ, Hoyos L (1996) Effect of degree of weathering on dynamic properties of residual soils. J Geotech Eng 122(12):988–997. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:12(988)
Maček M, Logar J, Pulko B (2019) Comparative evaluation of soil properties using CPT and DMT in-situ tests. Geomechanics and Tunnelling 12(4):318–327. https://doi.org/10.1002/geot.201900013
Marchetti S (1980) In situ tests by flat dilatometer. J Geotech Eng Div 106(3):299–321. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000934
Martin GK, Mayne PW (1997) Seismic flat dilatometer tests in connecticut valley varved clay. Geotech Test J 20(3):5–6. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ19970011
Meng F, Chen R, Wu H, **e S, Liu Y (2020) Observed behaviors of a long and deep excavation and collinear underlying tunnels in Shenzhen granite residual soil. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 103:103504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103504
Moeno HU (2011) Penentuan parameter geoteknik tanah residual Tropis Melalui Pengujian dilatometer. Jurnal Teknik Sipil 18(1):91–102. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2011.18.1.8
Ng CWW, Fung WT, Cheuk CY, Zhang L (2004) Influence of stress ratio and stress path on behavior of loose decomposed granite. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(1):36–44. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:1(36)
Nunes GB, de Oliveira OM, Massocco NS, dos Reis Higashi RA (2021) Study of the influence of suction profile seasonal variations in the global sliding safety factor of a granite residual soil slope. Bull Eng Geol Env 80(9):7253–7267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02367-3
Palmer AC (1972) Undrained plane-strain expansion of a cylindrical cavity in clay: a simple interpretation of the pressuremeter test. Géotechnique 22(3):451–457. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1972.22.3.451
Pineda J, Colmenares J, Hoyos L (2014) Effect of fabric and weathering intensity on dynamic properties of residual and saprolitic soils via resonant column testing. Geotech Test J 37:20120132. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20120132
Rahardjo H, Satyanaga A, Leong EC, Ng YS (2012) Variability of residual soil properties. Eng Geol 141(4):124–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.05.009
Rocchi I, Coop MR, Maccarini M (2017) The effects of weathering on the physical and mechanical properties of igneous and metamorphic saprolites. Eng Geol 231:56–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.10.003
Rocchi I, Okewale I, Coop M (2015) The behaviour of Hong Kong volcanic saprolites in one-dimensional compression. Volcanic Rocks and Soils
Santos JA, Duarte RJL, da Fonseca AV, Esteves EFMdC, Millpress (2005) ISC'2 experimental site - prediction & performance of instrumented axially loaded piles. In: 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering. Osaka, JAPAN, pp 2171–2174
Schnaid F, Ortigao JAR, Mantaras FM, Cunha RP, MacGregor I (2000) Analysis of self-boring pressuremeter (SBPM) and Marchetti dilatometer (DMT) tests in granite saprolites. Can Geotech J 37(4):796–810
Sun Y, Tang L, Lu W, Zhao Z (2018) Study of the shear properties of granite residual soil in the Guangzhou area using different testing methods. Fresenius Environ Bull 27(1):327–335
Wang H, Zhou Y, Yu G, Zhou B, Zhang A (2021) A triaxial test study on structural granite residual soil. Rock Soil Mech 42(4):991–1002. https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.2019.2117 (in Chinese)
Wang YH, Yan WM (2006) Laboratory studies of two common saprolitic soils in Hong Kong. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132(7):923–930. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:7(923)
Wood DM (1991) Strain-Dependent Moduli and Pressuremeter Tests Géotechnique 41(4):621–626. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.509
Yin S, Kong L, Zhang X (2017) Experimental study on stiffness characteristics of residual soil at small strain under hot and rainy climate. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 39(04):743–751. https://doi.org/10.11779/CJGE201704021 (in Chinese)
Yoo C, Lee D (2008) Deep excavation-induced ground surface movement characteristics – a numerical investigation. Comput Geotech 35(2):231–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2007.05.002
Yu J, Chen D, Wang H, Zhang B (2019) Analysis of the shear strength of granite residual soil and slope stability under wetting-drying cycles. Journal of **amen University (natural Science) 58(4):154–160. https://doi.org/10.6043/j.issn.0438-0479.201902003
Zhang X, Kong L, Li J (2018) Influence of dry and wet seasons on disintegration characteristics of basalt residual soil from the Leizhou Peninsula, China. Q J Eng GeolHydrogeol 51(4):450–460. https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2016-128
Zhang Y, Yao H, Li R, Wei Y, Chen Z (2016) Study on spatial variability of shear strength in different vertical layers of granite residual soil. Yangtze River 47(23):91–96. https://doi.org/10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2016.23.019 (in Chinese)
Zhao J, Broms BB, Zhou Y, Choa V (1994) A study of the weathering of the Bukit Timah granite part b: field and laboratory investigations. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 50(1):105–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02594962
Zhao YR, Yang HQ, Huang LP, Chen R, Chen XS, Liu SY (2019) Mechanical behavior of intact completely decomposed granite soils along multi-stage loading–unloading path. Eng Geol 260:105242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105242
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully think the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51709290 and 41972285), the Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. Z0190202), the Young Key Teachers in Colleges and Universities of Henan Province (No. 2020GGJS136), the Key Research Projects of Higher Education Institutions in Henan Province (No. 22A580008), the Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province (No. 2020CFA103), and the strength improvement plan of the advantageous disciplines of Zhongyuan University of Technology (No. GG202218).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, S., Huang, J., Kong, L. et al. Laboratory and in situ tests on dynamic shear modulus of granite residual soil. Bull Eng Geol Environ 81, 480 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02978-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-022-02978-4