Log in

Estimation of rock mass permeability using variation in hydraulic conductivity with depth: experiences in hard rocks of western Turkey

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determining permeability of fractured rocks is a focal point in engineering projects. Many methods have been developed for direct in situ determination of the hydraulic parameter; nevertheless, especially in the preliminary stages of rock mass characterization, empirical correlations are used to estimate the rock permeability. This study proposes a relationship between rock mass depth and permeability that may be useful for initial hydraulic characterization of fractured media. For this purpose, results of core drilling, injection tests, and geophysical prospecting carried out in fractured hard rocks—mainly andesites and secondly metamorphites—of western Turkey were considered. A decrease in rock mass permeability with depth is evident from the results of injection tests. Within the depth of investigation (the first 100 m), hydraulic conductivity shows an exponential declining trend with depth and depends on the surface value of the hydraulic parameter. No correlation is evident between discontinuity spacing and depth or rock quality designation (RQD) and depth. The applicability of the relationship found requires a hydrostructural homogeneity of the rock mass, which can be verified through inexpensive geological survey and geophysical prospecting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altunkaynak S, Yilmaz Y (1998) The mount Kozak magmatic complex, Western Anatolia. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 85:211–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandis SC, Lumsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 20:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandis SC, Barton NR, Christianson M (1985) Application of a new numerical model of joint behaviour to rock mechanics problems. Fundamentals of Rock Joints. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Fundamentals of Rock Joints. Bjorkliden, September 1985, Centek, Lulea, Sweden 345–356

  • Carlsson A, Olsson T (1977) Hydraulic properties of Swedish crystalline rocks – hydraulic conductivity and its relation to depth. Bulletin of the Geological Institute, University of Uppsala 7: 71–84

  • Carlsson A, Olsson T (1993) The analysis of fractures, stress and water flow for rock engineering projects. In: Hudson JA Ed, Comprehensive Rock Engineering, Principle, Practice & Projects. Pergamon, Oxford UK 2: 415–437

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cha SS, Lee JY, Lee DH, Amantini E, Lee KK (2006) Engineering characterization of hydraulic properties in a pilot rock cavern for underground storage LNG storage. Eng Geol 84(3–4):229–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU (1964) Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. Rock Mechanics and Engineering Geology 1:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Naqa A (2001) The hydraulic conductivity of the fractures intersecting Cambrian sandstone rock masses, central Jordan. Environ Geol 40(8):973–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gale JE, Rouleau A, Witherspoon PA (1982) Hydrogeologic characteristics of a fractured granite. In: Papers of the Groundwater in Fractured Rock Conference, AWRC Conference Series No. 5, Canberra, pp 95–108

  • Illman WA, Neuman SP (2000) Type-curve interpretation of multi-rate single-hole pneumatic injection tests in unsaturated fractured rocks. Ground Water 38(6):899–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang XW, Wan L, Wang XS, Wu X, Zhang X (2009) Estimation of rock mass deformation modulus using variation on transmissivity and RQD with depth. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46:1370–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessels W, Kuck J (1995) Hydraulic communication in crystalline rock between the two boreholes of the continental deep drilling project in Germany. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruseman GP, de Ridder NA (1994) Analysis and evaluation of pum** test data. Second edition. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 377 pp

  • Lee CH, Farmer I (1993) Fluid flow in discontinuous rocks. Chapman and Hall, London, 169 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis DC, Burgy RH (1964) Hydraulic characteristics of fractured and jointed rock. Ground Water 2:4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis C (1974) Rock hydraulics. In: Muller L (ed) Rock mechanics. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp 299–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis C, Maini YNT (1970) Determination of in situ hydraulic parameters in jointed rock. Proc Sec Cong Int Soc Rock Mech Privredni Pregled, Belgrade 1:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Meng Z, Zhang J, Wang R (2011) in situ stress, pore pressure and stress-dependent permeability in the southern Qinshui Basin. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48(1):122–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP (2005) Trends, prospects and challenges in quantifying flow and transport through fractured rocks. Hydrogeol J 13:124–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okay AI (2008) Geology of Turkey: a synopsis. Anschnitt 21:19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Okay AI, Goncuoglu MC (2004) Karakaya complex: a review of data and concepts. Turk J Earth Sci 13:77–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi MU, Khan KM, Bessaih N, Al-Mawali K, Al-Sadrani K (2014) An empirical relationship between in situ permeability and RQD of discontinuous sedimentary rocks. EJGE 19:4781–4790

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen Z (1996) Theoretical RQD-porosity-conductivity-aperture charts. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 33(2):173–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro AM, Hsieh PA (1998) How good are estimates of transmissivity from slug tests in fractured rock? Ground Water 36(1):37–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow DT (1968) Rock fracture spacings, openings and porosities. J Soil Mech Found Div Proc Am Soc Civil Eng 94:73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow DT (1969) Anisotropic permeability of fractured media. Water Resour Res 5(6):1273–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow DT (1970) The frequency and apertures of fractures in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 7:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stober I, Bucher K (2005) Deep-fluids: Neptune meets Pluto. Hydrogeol J 13:112–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiedeman CR, Hsieh PA (2001) Assessing an open-well aquifer test in fractured crystalline rock. Ground Water 39(1):68–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation (2001) Engineering Geology Field Manual. Second Edition, Volume 2. http://www.usbr.gov/tsc/techreferences/mands/geologyfieldmanual.html. Accessed 31 January 2017

  • Wei ZQ, Egger P, Descoeudres F (1995) Permeability predictions for jointed rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon PA, Wang JSY, Iwai K, Gale JE (1980) Validity of cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res 16:1016–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L (2013) Aspects of rock permeability. Front Struct Civ Eng 7(2):102–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J (1998) Rock mass hydraulic conductivity of the Bukit Timah granite, Singapore. Eng Geol 50(1–2):211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J, Yeh TJ (2006) Analysis of hydraulic tomography using temporal moments of drawdown recovery data. Water Resour Res 42:W02403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler TW (1976) Determination of rock mass permeability. Technical Report S-76-2, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg Mississippi

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the editor and the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions and comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzo Piscopo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piscopo, V., Baiocchi, A., Lotti, F. et al. Estimation of rock mass permeability using variation in hydraulic conductivity with depth: experiences in hard rocks of western Turkey. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77, 1663–1671 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1058-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1058-8

Keywords

Navigation