Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
In Deutschland ist die Therapie der Wahl der dislozierten medialen Schenkelhalsfraktur des älteren Menschen die endoprothetische Versorgung innerhalb von 24 h. Als operative Optionen stehen sich die Hüfttotalendoprothese (HTEP) und die Hemiendoprothese (HE) gegenüber.
Fragestellung
Es wird folgenden Fragen nachgegangen: differenzierte Patientenselektion für HTEP oder HE, „Ist die HE eine halbe Sache?“, zementierte oder zementfreie (Schaft‑)Implantation, geänderte Vorgehensweise durch neue, operative Zugänge.
Material und Methode
Es erfolgte eine Analyse der nationalen Prothesenregister sowie des Endoprothesenregister Deutschlands (EPRD) mit Darstellung der Versorgungshäufigkeit der medialen Schenkelhalsfraktur mit der endoprothetischen Versorgung durch HE vs. HTEP.
Ergebnisse
Die Durchsicht der nationalen Register zeigt eine Favorisierung der zementierten Technik bei älteren Patienten und bestätigt die niedrigeren Luxations- und Revisionsraten für die HE im Vergleich zur HTEP. Aus den Daten des EPRD zeigt sich, dass 2017 insgesamt 9,5 % der hüftendoprothetischen Eingriffe mit HEs durchgeführt wurden. Es ergab sich eine höhere Revisionsrate für nichtelektive HTEPs von 7,0 % im Vergleich zu HEs mit 4,5 %.
Schlussfolgerungen
Die Auswahl des Implantats für die endoprothetische Versorgung nach medialer Schenkelhalsfraktur ist abhängig von einer Vielzahl von patienten-, operateur- und implantatspezifischen Faktoren. Die geringeren Revisionsraten der HE widerlegen die Annahme, dass eine HE nur „eine halbe Sache“ sei. Anteriore oder anterolaterale Zugänge sind dem posterioren Zugang hinsichtlich Luxationstendenz überlegen. Nationale Unterschiede zeigen sich in Bezug auf die Zementierung der Prothese.
Abstract
Background
In Germany the treatment of choice for dislocated medial femoral neck fractures in older patients is arthroplasty of the hip within 24 h. Operative options include total hip arthroplasty (THA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA).
Objective
Differentiated patient selection for THA or HA, is HA only a half measure, cemented or cementless (stem) implantation, altered approach due to new surgical access routes?
Material and methods
Analysis of the national prosthesis registers worldwide and the German Arthroplasty Register (EPRD) with presentation of the rates of arthroplasty options THA vs. HA for dislocated medial femoral neck fractures.
Results
The review of the national registries showed that a cemented technique was favored in older patients and confirmed the lower revision rate for HA. The data from the EPRD showed that in 2017 a total of 9.5% of all hip arthroplasty surgeries were performed with HA. There was a higher revision rate for patients undergoing non-elective THA (7.0%) compared to HA (4.5%).
Conclusion
The choice of implant in hip arthroplasty for medial femoral neck fractures depends on a variety of patient, surgeon and implant-specific factors. The significantly lower revision rate of the HA disproves the assumption that HA is “only a half measure”. Anterior or lateral approaches seem to be superior compared to posterior approaches, particularly with respect to the dislocation rate. National differences are evident in cementation of the prosthesis.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10039-019-0421-3/MediaObjects/10039_2019_421_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10039-019-0421-3/MediaObjects/10039_2019_421_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10039-019-0421-3/MediaObjects/10039_2019_421_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10039-019-0421-3/MediaObjects/10039_2019_421_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10039-019-0421-3/MediaObjects/10039_2019_421_Fig5_HTML.png)
Literatur
Bonnaire F, Weber A (2015) AWMF S2e-Leitlinie 012/001 – Schenkelhalsfraktur des Erwachsenen
Grothaus F‑J, Hasenpflug J, Jansson V, Liebs TR, Mannel H, Melsheimer O, Steinbrück A, Wente M (2015) Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD) – Statusbericht 2014. EPRD Deutsche Endoprothesenregister, Berlin
Grimberg A, Jansson V, Liebs TR, Melsheimer O, Steinbrück A (2016) Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD) – Jahresbericht 2015. EPRD, Berlin
Grimberg A, Jansson V, Liebs TR, Melsheimer O, Steinbrück A (2017) Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD) – Jahresbericht 2016. EPRD, Berlin
Grimberg A, Jansson V, Liebs TR, Melsheimer O, Steinbrück A (2018) Endoprothesenregister Deutschland (EPRD) – Jahresbericht 2017. EPRD, Berlin
Lübbeke A, Silman AJ, Barea C, Prieto-Alhambra D, Carr AJ (2018) Map** existing hip and knee replacement registries in Europe. Health Policy 122:548–557
Yli-Kyyny T, Sund R, Heinanen M, Venesmaa P, Kroger H (2014) Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures? Acta Orthop 85:49–53
Leonardsson O, Karrholm J, Akesson K, Garellick G, Rogmark C (2012) Higher risk of reoperation for bipolar and uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83:459–466
Moerman S, Mathijssen NMC, Tuinebreijer WE, Vochteloo AJH, Nelissen R (2018) Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision. Acta Orthop 89:509–514
National Joint Registry UK (2018) 15th annual report national joint registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man
Kannan A, Kancherla R, McMahon S, Hawdon G, Soral A, Malhotra R (2012) Arthroplasty options in femoral-neck fracture: answers from the national registries. Int Orthop 36:1–8
Picus R, Ziernhöld G, Bonetti M (2017) 2. Bericht Prothesenregister Hüftprothesen 2010–2015 Autonome Provinz Bozen. Autonome Provinz Bozen, Bozen
Gillam MH, Ryan P, Graves SE, Miller LN, de Steiger RN, Salter A (2010) Competing risks survival analysis applied to data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Acta Orthop 81:548–555
Costain DJ, Whitehouse SL, Pratt NL, Graves SE, Ryan P, Crawford RW (2011) Perioperative mortality after hemiarthroplasty related to fixation method. Acta Orthop 82:275–281
Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) (2018) Hip, Knee & Shoulder Arthroplasty: 2018 Annual Report. AOANJRR, Adelaide
Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S (2010) Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001706.pub4
Hansson S, Nemes S, Karrholm J, Rogmark C (2017) Reduced risk of reoperation after treatment of femoral neck fractures with total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 88:500–504
Ochi H, Baba T, Homma Y, Matsumoto M, Watari T, Ozaki Y, Kobayashi H, Kaneko K (2017) Total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach with a dual mobility cup for displaced femoral neck fracture in patients with a high risk of dislocation. SICOT J 3:56
Assi CC, Barakat HB, Caton JG, Najjar EN, Samaha CT, Yammine KF (2019) Mortality rate and mid-term outcomes of total hip Arthroplasty using dual mobility cups for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in a middle eastern population. J Arthroplasty 34(2):333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.030
Blomfeldt R, Tornkvist H, Eriksson K, Soderqvist A, Ponzer S, Tidermark J (2007) A randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:160–165
Gjertsen JE, Fenstad AM, Leonardsson O, Engesaeter LB, Karrholm J, Furnes O, Garellick G, Rogmark C (2014) Hemiarthroplasties after hip fractures in Norway and Sweden: a collaboration between the Norwegian and Swedish national registries. Hip Int 24:223–230
Cornell CN, Levine D, O’Doherty J, Lyden J (1998) Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 348:67–71
Ravikumar KJ, Marsh G (2000) Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur—13 year results of a prospective randomised study. Injury 31:793–797
Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF (2005) Displaced intracapsular hip fractures in fit, older people: a randomised comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. Health Technol Assess (Rockv) 9:iii–iv, ix–x, 1–65
Avery PP, Baker RP, Walton MJ, Rooker JC, Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister GC (2011) Total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a seven- to ten-year follow-up report of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1045–1048
Baker RP, Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister GC (2006) Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2583–2589
Nilsson LT, Jalovaara P, Franzen H, Niinimaki T, Stromqvist B (1994) Function after primary hemiarthroplasty and secondary total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fracture. J Arthroplasty 9:369–374
Nemes S, Lind D, Cnudde P, Bulow E, Rolfson O, Rogmark C (2018) Relative survival following hemi-and total hip arthroplasty for hip fractures in Sweden. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:407
Azegami S, Gurusamy KS, Parker MJ (2011) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fractures: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Hip Int 21:509–517
Wang F, Zhang H, Zhang Z, Ma C, Feng X (2015) Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:229
Frenken MRM, Schotanus MGM, van Haaren EH, Hendrickx R (2018) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip in patients with a femoral neck fracture: a comparison of two modern stem design implants. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 28:1305–1312
Langslet E, Frihagen F, Opland V, Madsen JE, Nordsletten L, Figved W (2014) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: 5‑year followup of a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:1291–1299
Kärrholm J, Lindahl H, Malchau H, Mohaddes M, Nemes S, Rogmark C, Rolfson O (2017) The Swedish hip arthroplasty register—annual report 2016
Ames JB, Lurie JD, Tomek IM, Zhou W, Koval KJ (2010) Does surgeon volume for total hip arthroplasty affect outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture? Am J Orthop 39:E84–E89
Sheikh HQ, Aqil A, Hossain FS, Kapoor H (2018) There is no weekend effect in hip fracture surgery—A comprehensive analysis of outcomes. Surgeon 16:259–264
NZOA—New Zealand Orthopaedic Association (2018) The New Zealand joint registry 19th year report January 1999 to December 2017. NZOA—New Zealand Orthopaedic Association, New Zealand
Bhandari M, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2009) Resolving controversies in hip fracture care: the need for large collaborative trials in hip fractures. J Orthop Trauma 23:479–484
Hochfelder JP, Khatib ON, Glait SA, Slover JD (2014) Femoral neck fractures in New York State. Is the rate of THA increasing, and do race or payer influence decision making? J Orthop Trauma 28:422–426
Woon CYL, Moretti VM, Schwartz BE, Goldberg BA (2017) Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty: US national trends in the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Am J Orthop 46:E474–E478
Masionis P, Uvarovas V, Mazarevicius G, Popov K, Venckus S, Bauzys K, Porvaneckas N (2019) The reliability of a Garden, AO and simple II stage classifications for intracapsular hip fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2018.11.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
S. Hungerer, C. Glowalla, M. Berninger und F. Stuby geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine von den Autoren durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hungerer, S., Glowalla, C., Berninger, M. et al. Duokopf- versus Totalendoprothese zur Versorgung von Schenkelhalsfrakturen. Trauma Berufskrankh 21, 31–38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10039-019-0421-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10039-019-0421-3