Log in

Postoperative pain and quality of life after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

As part of a large prospective randomized Austrian multicenter trial evaluating recurrence rates and complications of open and laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs we assessed postoperative pain and quality of life.

Methods

Approximately 151 patients were randomized to Shouldice repair, Bassini operation, or laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP). Pain was recorded preoperatively and on the first four postoperative days. Quality of life was recorded preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively.

Results

Patients having Shouldice repairs had significantly higher visual analog-scale scores for pain on the fourth postoperative day (P=0.048) and significantly higher scores in McGill pain questionnaires on the first four postoperative days (P=0.046) compared with the other groups. Apart from a significantly lower score in postoperative bodily pain in the Shouldice group (P=0.039), no significant differences in quality of life were apparent among the three methods.

Conclusions

The TAPP and Bassini repairs result in less short-term postoperative pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dierking GW, Ostergaard E, Ostergaard HT, Dahl JB (1992) Effect of pre- versus postoperative inguinal field block on postoperative pain after herniorrhaphy. Br J Anaesth 68:344–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dueholm S, Forrest M, Hjortso E, Lemvigh E (1989) Pain relief following herniotomy: a double-blind randomized comparison between naproxen and placebo. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 33:391–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sinclair R, Cassuto J, Hogstrom S, Linden I, Faxen A, Hedner T, Ekman R (1988) Topical anesthesia with lidocaine aerosol in the control of postoperative pain. Anesthesiology 68:895–901

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzgibbons RJ, Camps J, Cornet DA, Nguyen NX, Litke BS, Annibali R, Salerno GM (1995) Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: results of a multicenter trial. Ann Surg 221:3–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kozol R, Lange PM, Kosir M, Beleski K, Mason K, Tennenberg S, Kubinec SM, Wilson RF (1997) A prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. An assessment of postoperative pain. Arch Surg 132:292–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liem MSL, van der Graaf Y, van Steensel CJ, Boelhouwer RU, Clevers GJ, Meijer WS, Stassen LP, Vente JP, Weidema WF, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair. N Engl J Med 336:1541–1547

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. Lancet 354:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stoker DL, Spiegelhalter DJ, Singh R, Wellwood JM (1994) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial. Lancet 343:1243–1245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 9:1127–1131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Melzack R (1987) The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 30:191–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L, for the consort Group (2001) Use of the consort statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before and after evaluation? JAMA 285:1992–1995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Berndsen F, Arvidsson D, Enander LK, Leijonmarck CE, Wingren U, Rudberg C, Smedberg S, Wickbom G, Montgomery A (2002) Postoperative convalescence after inguinal hernia surgery: prospective randomized multicenter study of laparoscopic versus shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1042 patients. Hernia 6:56–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leibl B, Daubler P, Schwarz J, Ulrich M, Bittner R (1995) Standardized laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) versus Shouldice repair. Results of a randomized trial. Chirurgie 66:895–898

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tschudi J, Wagner M, Klaiber C, Brugger J-J, Frei E, Krahenbuhl L, Inderbitzi R, Husler J, Schmitz SH (1996) Controlled multicenter trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice herniorrhaphy. Surg Endosc 10:845–847

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Junge K, Peiper C, Rosch R, Lynen P, Schumpelick V (2002) Effect of tension induced by Shouldice repair on postoperative course and long-term outcome. Eur J Surg 168:329–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peiper C, Junge K, Futing A, Bassalay P, Conze J, Schumpelick V (2001) Inguinal tensile strength and pain level after Shouldice repair. Hernia 5:129–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Barkun JS, Wexler MJ, Hinchey EJ, Thibeault D, Meakins JL (1995) Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Surgery 118:703–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawrence K, McWhinnie D, Goodwin A, Doll H, Gordon A, Gray A, Britton J, Collin J (1995) Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: Early results. BMJ 311:981–985

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liem MS, Halsema JA, van der Graaf Y, Schrijvers AJ, van Vroonhoven TJ (1997) Cost-effectiveness of extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison with conventional herniorrhaphy. Coala trial group. Ann Surg 226:668–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Pokorny.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pokorny, H., Klingler, A., Scheyer, M. et al. Postoperative pain and quality of life after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized trial. Hernia 10, 331–337 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0105-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-006-0105-3

Keywords

Navigation