Log in

Specificity of Reinnervation and Motor Recovery after Interposition of an Artificial Barrier Between Transected and Repaired Nerves in Adjacency – An Experimental Study in the Rat

  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

 Non-specific re-innervation of target organs caused by misdirected axonal growth at the repair site is regarded as one reason for a poor functional outcome after peripheral nerve transsection and repair. This study investigates the rate of aberrant re-innervation and its influence on motor recovery in the rat sciatic nerve using artificial sheets as barrier between tibial and peroneal nerves.

 The sciatic nerve was transsected and repaired as follows: epineural sutures (A×6), fascicular repair of tibial and peroneal nerves respectively (B×8), and the same as in group B, but separating both nerves using an Integra®-sheet with silicone (C×8), or Integra® without silicone (D×8). As control, solely the tibial nerve was transsected and repaired (E×5).

 Final investigations after 4 months revealed that in group C, 50% of the Integra®-silicone sheets were dislocated. No dislocation was found in group D. Muscle contraction force of the gastrocnemius muscle was significantly higher in group E as compared to all other groups. However although not significant, group D showed a consistently higher muscle contraction force than groups A, B, and C. Histology in groups A, B, and C with dislocated sheets demonstrated multiple axons growing from the tibial to the peroneal nerve and vice versa. In groups D and E, no such axonal growth was visible. These findings were confirmed by a significantly higher rate of specific re-innervation of the soleus muscle using sequential retrograde double labelling technique.

 Results of this study suggest that an artificial sheet such as Integra® bears the potential of preventing aberrant re-innervation between repaired adjacent nerves resulting in improved motor recovery. Clinically, this technique may be of importance for brachial plexus, sciatic nerve, and facial nerve repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lutz, B., Ma, SF., Chuang, D. et al. Specificity of Reinnervation and Motor Recovery after Interposition of an Artificial Barrier Between Transected and Repaired Nerves in Adjacency – An Experimental Study in the Rat. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143, 393–399 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010170095

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010170095

Navigation