Log in

Depth of tumor invasion in locally advanced rectal cancer correlates with patients’ prognosis: The usefulness of elastic stain for its measurement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The relationship between the prognosis and the extent of colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is still unclear. As a simple parameter of the local invasion of CRC, we assessed the extent of tumor invasion beyond the outer border of the muscularis propria (MP).

Methods

We examined 147 cases of CRC using a slight modification of the procedure established by the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. For the statistical analysis, the patients were divided into two groups, namely, a “shallow” group and a “deep” group, using a specific cut-off value (COV). A multivariate analysis to identify independent prognostic factors was performed.

Results

Significant differences in the 5-year survival rate were observed between the “shallow” and “deep” groups in 39 cases of rectal carcinoma (COV 4 mm; 72.4% vs. 30.0%, hazard ratio = 3.204), but not observed in 147 cases of CRC. In addition, the outcome for patients with “deep” cancer in the lower rectum was markedly worse than that for patients with “shallow” cancer (COV 4 mm; 81.8% vs. 12.5%, hazard ratio = 5.371).

Conclusions

The depth of tumor invasion beyond the MP is thus considered to be an important prognostic factor for patients with T3/T4 rectal carcinoma, especially in the lower rectum. A careful follow-up is required for the patients with rectal carcinoma that has invaded more than 4 mm beyond the MP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sobin LH, Wittekind C, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th ed. New York: Wiley-Liss; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. 6th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 1998.

  3. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. General rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. 7th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara; 2006.

  4. Dukes CE. The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol Bacteriol 1932;35:323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Astler VB, Coller FA. The prognostic significance of direct extension of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Ann Surg 1954;139: 846–852.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer in Japan, vol. 26. Cases treated in 1996. Tokyo; 1996.

  7. Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S, Takeda J, Ohkura Y, Kawamata H, et al. Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 2004;39:534–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ueno H, Murphy J, Jass JR, Mochizuki H, Talbot IC. Tumour “budding” as an index to estimate the potential of aggressiveness in rectal cancer. Histopathology 2002;40:127–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Shimazaki H, Aida S, Hase K, et al. Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2004;127:385–394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Quirke P, Durdey P, Dixon MF, Williams NS. Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma due to inadequate surgical resection: histopathological study of lateral tumour spread and surgical excision. Lancet 1986;2:996–999.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Willett CG, Badizadegan K, Ancukiewicz M, Shellito PC. Prognostic factors in stage T3N0 rectal cancer: do all patients require postoperative pelvic irradiation and chemotherapy? Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:167–173.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Picon AI, Moore HG, Sternberg SS, Minsky BD, Paty PB, Blumberg D, et al. Prognostic significance of depth of gross or microscopic perirectal fat invasion in T3 N0 M0 rectal cancers following sharp mesorectal excision and no adjuvant therapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003;18:487–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merkel S, Wein A, Gunter K, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P. High-risk groups of patients with stage II colon carcinoma. Cancer 2001;92:1435–1443.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Steel MCA, Woods R, Mackay JM, Chen F. Extent of mesorectal invasion is a prognostic indicator in T3 rectal carcinoma. ANZ J Surg 2002;72:483–487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyoshi M, Ueno H, Hashiguchi Y, Mochizuki H, Talbo IC. Extent of mesorectal tumor invasion as a prognostic factor after curative surgery for T3 rectal cancer patients. Ann Surg 2006;243:492–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vass DG, Ainsworth R, Anderson JH, Murray D, Foulis AK. The value of an elastic tissue stain in detecting venous invasion in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 2004;57:769–772.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shinto E, Ueno H, Hashiguchi Y, Hase K, Tsuda H, Matsubara O, et al. The subserosal elastic lamina: an anatomic landmark for stratifying pT3 colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47:467–473.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Katsumata, D., Fukui, H., Ono, Y. et al. Depth of tumor invasion in locally advanced rectal cancer correlates with patients’ prognosis: The usefulness of elastic stain for its measurement. Surg Today 38, 115–122 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3608-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-007-3608-3

Key words

Navigation