Abstract
Purpose
Tibio-talo-calcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) is considered a safe and valuable option for end-stage tibiotalar and subtalar arthritis, and usually is performed with a retrograde intramedullary nail. Although the good results reported, potential complications may be related to retrograde nail entry point. Aim of this systematic review is to analyze in cadaveric studies the risk of iatrogenic injuries related to different entry points and different retrograde intramedullary nail design when performing TTCA.
Methods
According to PRISMA, a systematic review of the literature was performed on PubMed, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases. A subgroup analysis comparing different entry point location (anatomical or fluoroscopic guided) and different nail design (straight vs. valgus curved nails) was performed.
Results
Five studies were included, for a total of 40 specimens. Superiority of anatomical landmark-guided entry points was observed. Different nail designs did not seem to influence nor iatrogenic injuries neither hindfoot alignment.
Conclusion
Retrograde intramedullary nail entry point should be placed in the lateral half of the hindfoot in order to minimize the risk of iatrogenic injuries.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00590-023-03512-2/MediaObjects/590_2023_3512_Fig1_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Milstrey A, Domnick C, Garcia P et al (2021) Trends in arthrodeses and total joint replacements in foot and ankle surgery in Germany during the past decade-Back to the fusion? Foot Ankle Surg 27:301–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FAS.2020.05.008
Yasui Y, Hannon CP, Seow D, Kennedy JG (2016) Ankle arthrodesis: a systematic approach and review of the literature. World J Orthop 7:700–708. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v7.i11.700
Moore TJ, Smith JW, Prince R et al (1995) Retrograde intramedullary nailing for ankle arthrodesis. Foot ankle Int 16:433–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079501600710
Anderson T, Linder L, Rydholm U et al (2005) Tibio-talocalcaneal arthrodesis as a primary procedure using a retrograde intramedullary nail: a retrospective study of 26 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Acta Orthop 76:580–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670510041592
Rammelt S, Pyrc J, Agren P-H et al (2013) Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion using the hindfoot arthrodesis nail: a multicenter study. Foot ankle Int 34:1245–1255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713487526
Burns PR, Dunse A (2017) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for foot and ankle deformities. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 34:357–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2017.02.007
Berend ME, Glisson RR, Nunley JA (1997) A biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and crossed lag screw fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot ankle Int 18:639–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079701801007
Muckley T, Eichorn S, Hoffmeier K et al (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of primary stiffness of tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with intramedullary nails. Foot ankle Int 28:224–231. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0224
Goebel M, Gerdesmeyer L, Mückley T et al (2006) Retrograde intramedullary nailing in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a short-term, prospective study. J Foot Ankle Surg 45:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2005.12.001
Johl C, Kircher J, Pohlmannn K, Jansson V (2006) Management of failed total ankle replacement with a retrograde short femoral nail: a case report. J Orthop Trauma 20:60–65. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bot.0000171880.03581.4a
Carrier DA, Harris CM (1991) Ankle arthrodesis with vertical Steinmann’s pins in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 268:10–14
Pant R, Ilyas I, Younge DA (2003) The supracondylar femoral nail in tibia. Int Orthop 27:352–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0508-z
Stone KH, Helal B (1991) A method of ankle stabilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res 268:102–106
Chou LB, Mann RA, Yaszay B et al (2000) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis Foot ankle Int 21:804–808. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070002101002
Thordarson DB, Chang D (1999) Stress fractures and tibial cortical hypertrophy after tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with an intramedullary nail. Foot ankle Int 20:497–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079902000806
Mückley T, Schütz T, Srivastava S et al (2003) Ankle arthrodesis with intramedullary compression nailing. Unfallchirurg 106:732–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-003-0638-1
Goebel M, Muckley T, Gerdesmeyer L et al (2003) Intramedullary nailing in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Unfallchirurg 106:633–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-003-0626-5
Pochatko DJ, Smith JW, Phillips RA et al (1995) Anatomic structures at risk: combined subtalar and ankle arthrodesis with a retrograde intramedullary rod. Foot ankle Int 16:542–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079501600905
Flock TJ, Ishikawa S, Hecht PJ, Wapner KL (1997) Heel anatomy for retrograde tibiotalocalcaneal roddings: a roentgenographic and anatomic analysis. Foot ankle Int 18:233–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079701800409
Stephenson KA, Kile TA, Graves SC (1996) Estimating the insertion site during retrograde intramedullary tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot ankle Int 17:781–782. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079601701212
de Cesar NC, Johannesmeyer D, Cone B et al (2017) Neurovascular Structures at Risk With Curved Retrograde TTC Fusion Nails. Foot Ankle Int 38:1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100717715909
Campbell I (2007) Chi-squared and Fisher-Irwin tests of two-by-two tables with small sample recommendations. Stat Med 26:3661–3675. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2832
Richardson JTE (2011) The analysis of 2 × 2 contingency tables--yet again. Stat Med 30:890; author reply 891–2
Altman DG, Machin D, Bryant TNGM (eds) (2000) Statistics with confidence, 2nd edn. BMJ Books
Moorjani N, Buckingham R, Winson I (1998) Optimal insertion site for intramedullary nails during combined ankle and subtalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Surg 4:21–26. https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1460-9584.1998.00077.X
Mückley T, Ullm S, Petrovitch A et al (2007) Comparison of two intramedullary nails for tibiotalocalcaneal fusion: anatomic and radiographic considerations. Foot ankle Int 28:605–613. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2007.0605
Knight T, Rosenfeld P, Jones IT et al (2014) Anatomic structures at risk: curved hindfoot arthrodesis nail–a cadaveric approach. J Foot Ankle Surg 53:687–691. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2014.06.005
Callahan R, Juliano P, Aydogan U, Clayton J (2018) Avoiding pitfalls of tibiotalocalcaneal nail malposition with internal rotation axial heel view. Foot Ankle Spec. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938640018770255
Franceschi F, Franceschetti E, Torre G et al (2016) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using an intramedullary nail: a systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1316–1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3548-1
McGarvey WC, Trevino SG, Baxter DE et al (1998) Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: anatomic and technical considerations. Foot ankle Int 19:363–369. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079801900604
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zielli, S.O., Mazzotti, A., Artioli, E. et al. Retrograde intramedullary nail entry point for tibio-talo-calcaneal arthrodesis: a review of anatomical studies. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 33, 3185–3195 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03512-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03512-2