SpringerLink
Log in

Prognostic factors in distractive extension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The subaxial spine has high risk of fatal damage by trauma and thereby requires more accurate and aggressive treatment. For the proper treatment and predicting the prognosis, the evaluation to reveal the risk factors for the prognosis is important. We analyzed the various factors contributing to the prognosis in distractive extension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine.

Methods

The study included 103 patients who were diagnosed as distractive extension injury of subaxial cervical spine. We evaluate the patient age, sex, cause of injury, initial neurological impairment, number and portion of injured segment, spinal stenosis, extent of soft tissue damage, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and degenerative spondylosis as a prognostic factor. To analyze the factor related with prognosis, the subjects were divided into group A, in which patients had neurological recovery ≥grade 2 on the ASIA scale or showed normal in final follow-up and group B, in which patients have no neurological recovery.

Results

Prognosis was not associated with age, sex, and cause of injury (P = 0.677, 0.541, and 0.965, respectively). Prognosis was poor in cases with spinal stenosis (P = 0.009), soft tissue damage ≥grade 3 on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (P = 0.002), or severe neurological impairment (P ≤ 0.001). Logistic regression analysis also showed that prognosis was poor in cases with spinal stenosis (OR 5.03; 95 % CI 1.20–16.93), soft tissue damage ≥grade 3 on MRI (OR 7.63; 95 % CI 1.86–31.34), or severe neurological impairment (ASIA C, D, OR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.14–2.41; ASIA A, B, OR 18.43, 95 % CI 1.64–207.69).

Conclusion

The prognosis of patients with distractive extension injury of the subaxial cervical spine was poor in cases with spinal stenosis, severe soft tissue damage in MRI findings or severe initial neurological impairment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen BL Jr, Ferguson RL, Lehmann TR, O’Brien RP (1982) A mechanistic classification of closed, indirect fractures and dislocations of the lower cervical spine. Spine 197(1):1–27 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Song KJ, Kim GH, Lee KB (2008) The efficacy of the modified classification system of soft tissue injury in extension injury of the lower cervical spine. Spine 33(15):E488–E493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Song KJ, Lee KB (2008) The significance of soft tissue injury in lower cervical spine trauma. Neurosurg Q 18:28–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marar BC (1974) Hyperextension injuries of the cervical spine. The pathogenesis of damage to the spinal cord. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1655–1662

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marino RJ, Barros T, Biering-Sorensen F, Burns SP, Donovan WH, Graves DE, Haak M, Hudson LM, Priebe MM (2003) International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 26:S50–S56

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herzog RJ, Wiens JJ, Dillingham MF, Sontag MJ (1991) Normal cervical spine morphometry and cervical spinal stenosis in asymptomatic professional football players: plain film radiography, multiplanar computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 16:178–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pavlov H, Torg JS, Robie B, Jahre C (1987) Cervical spinal stenosis: determination with vertebral body ratio method. Radiology 164:771–775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Song KJ, Choi BW, Lee KB, Chang H (2012) The relationship between soft tissue damages and neurologic deficits in distractive extension injury of the lower cervical spine. J Korean Orthop Assoc 47:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor AR, Blackwood W (1948) Paraplegia in hyperextension cervical injuries with normal radiographic appearances. J Bone Jont Surg Br 30B(2):245–248

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herkowitz HN (2011) Rothman-Simeone. The Spine, 6th edn. Elsevier

  11. Friedenberg BZB, Jack E (1959) Distractive extension injury. H. Newton Spencer; S. C. Tolentino: degenerative changes in the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 41:61–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stauffer ES, MacMillan M (1996) Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. In: Rockwood CA, Green DP, Bucholz RW, Heckman JD (eds) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, 4th edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 1475–1477

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hohl M (1974) Soft-tissue injuries of the neck in automobile accidents. Factors influencing prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1675–1682

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eismont FJ, Clifford S, Goldberg M, Green B (1984) Cervical sagittal spinal canal size in spine injury. Spine 9:663–666 (Phila Pa 1976)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Ito K, Machino M, Kato F (2011) Mechanical patterns of cervical injury influence postoperative neurological outcome: a verification of the allen system. Spine 15;36(6):E441–E446 (Phila Pa 1976)

Download references

Acknowledgments

2013 Inje University research grant funds were received to support this work.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea

    Kyung-** Song, Chan-Il Park & Kwang-Bok Lee

  2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, 1435, Jwa-dong, Haeundae-gu, Busan, 612-030, Korea

    Byung-Wan Choi

Authors
  1. Kyung-** Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Byung-Wan Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chan-Il Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kwang-Bok Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byung-Wan Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, KJ., Choi, BW., Park, CI. et al. Prognostic factors in distractive extension injuries of the subaxial cervical spine. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25 (Suppl 1), 101–106 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1479-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1479-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation