Log in

Cross-sectional analysis of associated anomalies and vertebral anomaly location in 1289 surgical congenital scoliosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study systematically analyzed and assessed the interrelationships among vertebral anomaly location, congenital scoliosis (CS) type and associated abnormality prevalence.

Methods

We retrospectively extracted medical records of 1289 CS inpatients surgically treated in our institute from January 2010–December 2019. All patients underwent spinal X-ray, CT, MRI, echocardiogram, urogenital ultrasound and systemic physical examination. We analyzed information on demographics, CS type, associated anomalies and vertebral anomaly location.

Results

Cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebral anomalies were found in 5.7%, 78.1% and 33.6% of patients, respectively. 82.7% had one region involved. 59.5% with cervical malformations had mixed defects and 61.1% with lumbar malformations exhibited failure of formation. The musculoskeletal defect prevalence was 28.4%, 19.1% and 9.0% in patients with cervical, thoracic and lumbar anomalies. The intraspinal defect prevalence was 33.4% and 20.7% for thoracic and lumbar anomalies. 86.5% of patients with cervical anomalies had more than one region involved, while 78.1% and 62.2% with thoracic and lumbar anomalies, respectively, had only one region involved.

Conclusions

Cervical malformations had higher prevalence of mixed defects, musculoskeletal and intraspinal defects and multi-region involved. Thoracic malformations had higher prevalence of intraspinal and musculoskeletal defects and more involvement of only one vertebral region. Lumbar vertebral malformation patients had much lower prevalence of intraspinal and musculoskeletal defects and more involvement of only one vertebral region. Cervical malformation was a risk factor for more associated anomalies and more severe vertebral anomalies, which deserves more attention from surgeons in outpatient clinic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Giampietro PF, Blank RD, Raggio CL, Merchant S, Jacobsen FS, Faciszewski T, Shukla SK, Greenlee AR, Reynolds C, Schowalter DB (2003) Congenital and idiopathic scoliosis: clinical and genetic aspects. Clin Med Res 1(2):125–136. https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.1.2.125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Batra S, Ahuja S (2008) Congenital scoliosis: management and future directions. Acta Orthop Belg 74(2):147–160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giampietro PF, Raggio CL, Blank RD, McCarty C, Broeckel U, Pickart MA (2013) Clinical, genetic and environmental factors associated with congenital vertebral malformations. Mol Syndromol 4(1–2):94–105. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li Z, Yu X, Shen J (2015) Environmental aspects of congenital scoliosis. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22(8):5751–5755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4144-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beals RK, Robbins JR, Rolfe B (1993) Anomalies associated with vertebral malformations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18(10):1329–1332. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199308000-00012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Basu PS, Elsebaie H, Noordeen MH (2002) Congenital spinal deformity: a comprehensive assessment at presentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(20):2255–2259. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200210150-00014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rai AS, Taylor TK, Smith GH, Cumming RG, Plunkett-Cole M (2002) Congenital abnormalities of the urogenital tract in association with congenital vertebral malformations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(6):891–895. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b6.11814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu YT, Guo LL, Tian Z, Zhu WL, Yu B, Zhang SY, Qiu GX (2011) A retrospective study of congenital scoliosis and associated cardiac and intraspinal abnormities in a Chinese population. Eur Spine J 20(12):2111–2114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1818-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Shen J, Wang Z, Liu J, Xue X, Qiu G (2013) Abnormalities associated with congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of 226 Chinese surgical cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(10):814–818. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ed125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghandhari H, Tari HV, Ameri E, Safari MB, Fouladi DF (2015) Vertebral, rib, and intraspinal anomalies in congenital scoliosis: a study on 202 Caucasians. Eur Spine J 24(7):1510–1521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3833-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bozcali E, Ucpunar H, Sevencan A, Balioglu MB, Albayrak A, Polat V (2016) A retrospective study of congenital cardiac abnormality associated with scoliosis. Asian Spine J 10(2):226–230. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta N, S R, G B, Shetty A, (2016) Vertebral and intraspinal anomalies in Indian population with congenital scoliosis: a study of 119 consecutive patients. Asian Spine J 10(2):276–281. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2016.10.2.276

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Beauregard-Lacroix E, Tardif J, Camurri MV, Lemyre E, Barchi S, Parent S, Campeau PM (2017) Retrospective analysis of congenital scoliosis: associated anomalies and genetic diagnoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42(14):E841–E847. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sevencan A, Misir A, Ucpunar H, Balioglu MB, Gur V, Akinci S (2019) The prevalence and interrelationship of concomitant anomalies in congenital scoliosis. Turk Neurosurg 29(3):404–408. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.24429-18.2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohanty SP, Pai Kanhangad M, Narayana Kurup JK, Saiffudeen S (2020) Vertebral, intraspinal and other organ anomalies in congenital scoliosis. Eur Spine J 29(10):2449–2456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06450-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. MacEwen GD, Winter RB, Hardy JH (1972) Evaluation of kidney anomalies in congenital scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 54(7):1451–1454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McMaster MJOK (1982) The natural history of congenital scoliosis. A study of two hundred and fifty-one patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64(8):1128–1147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Winter RBMJ, Wang JF (1973) Congenital kyphosis. Its natural history and treatment as observed in a study of one hundred and thirty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55(2):223–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kaplan KM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA (2005) Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine J 5(5):564–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.10.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bollini G, Launay F, Docquier PL, Viehweger E, Jouve JL (2010) Congenital abnormalities associated with hemivertebrae in relation to hemivertebrae location. J Pediatr Orthop B 19(1):90–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e3283327f57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81972037, 81902178), National Key Research & Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC1104902), Bei**g Natural Science Foundation (No. L192015), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 3332019021), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2020M670008ZX).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianguo Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest statement.

Ethics approval

This study has been approved from the Institutional Review Board.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, G., Chai, X., Wang, S. et al. Cross-sectional analysis of associated anomalies and vertebral anomaly location in 1289 surgical congenital scoliosis. Eur Spine J 30, 3577–3584 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06898-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06898-x

Keywords

Navigation