Log in

Obstetric and anesthetic management in parturients with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: a case series

  • Clinical Report
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Further study is needed to determine the safest mode of delivery and anesthetic management for parturients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VP). Prior recommendation for delivery in women with ventriculoperitoneal shunts was cesarean delivery. However, both vaginal delivery and neuraxial anesthesia have been shown to be safe in women with appropriately functioning VP shunts. We present a case series of parturients with VP shunt. Parturients with VP shunts were identified and VP shunt placement indications, neurologic symptoms during pregnancy, delivery mode, anesthetic type, and postpartum complications were reviewed. Forty patients were identified, and fifteen women with twenty deliveries were included. Two women experienced neurological symptoms during pregnancy and one required postpartum shunt revision for blurry vision and ataxia. There were ten cesarean deliveries and ten vaginal deliveries (eight normal spontaneous, one vacuum assisted, and one forceps assisted). Assisted vaginal deliveries were performed to decrease Valsalva including the patient with neurological symptoms related to shunt malfunction. Of the vaginal deliveries, six (60%) had epidural analgesia. Anesthesia for cesarean delivery included neuraxial anesthesia (n = 5) and general anesthesia (n = 5). In our cohort, women with VP shunt received neuraxial blockade without complication. Neuraxial techniques should be offered to women with appropriately functioning VP shunt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Kestle J, Drake J, Milner R, Sainte-Rose C, Cinalli G, Boop F, Piatt J, Haines S, Schiff S, Cochrane D, Steinbok P, MacNeil N. Long-term follow-up data from the Shunt Design Trial. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2000;33(5):230–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000055960.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Landwehr JB Jr, Isada NB, Pryde PG, Johnson MP, Evans MI, Canady AI. Maternal neurosurgical shunts and pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(1):134–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rajagopalan S, Gopinath S, Trinh VT, Chandrasekhar S. Anesthetic considerations for labor and delivery in women with cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017;30:23–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.01.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bursac D, Kulas T, Persec J, Persec Z, Duić Z, Partl JZ, Glavić Z, Hrgović Z, Bojanić K. Pregnancy and vaginal delivery in epidural analgesia in woman with cerebrospinal fluid shunt. Coll Antropol. 2013;37(4):1343–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freo U, Pitton M, Carron M, Ori C. Anesthesia for urgent sequential ventriculoperitoneal shunt revision and cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2009;18(3):284–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wisoff JH, Kratzert KJ, Handwerker SM, Young BK, Epstein F. Pregnancy in patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunts: report of a series and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1991;29(6):827–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cusimano MD, Meffe FM, Gentili F, Sermer M. Management of pregnant women with cerebrospinal fluid shunts. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1991;17(1):10–3. https://doi.org/10.1159/000120558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Palop R, Choed-Amphai E, Miller R. Epidural anesthesia for delivery complicated by benign intracranial hypertension. Anesthesiology. 1979;50(2):159–60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197902000-00017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Celik M, Kizilkaya M, Dostbil A, Dogan N, Parlak M, Can FK, Bayar M. Meningitis following spinal anaesthesia in an obstetric patient. Trop Doct. 2014;44(3):179–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049475514529760.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leffert LR, Schwamm LH. Neuraxial anesthesia in parturients with intracranial pathology: a comprehensive review and reassessment of risk. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(3):703–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829374c2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily E. Sharpe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wehrle, A.A., Welch, T.L., Hirte, I.L. et al. Obstetric and anesthetic management in parturients with ventriculoperitoneal shunt: a case series. J Anesth (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03369-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-024-03369-7

Keywords

Navigation