Log in

Perinatal outcomes comparison between neuraxial and general anesthesia in pregnant women with placenta accreta spectrum: a multicenter retrospective study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 21 May 2024

Abstract

Purpose

We investigated the impact of anesthesia mode on perinatal outcomes in patients with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) undergoing cesarean delivery and identified factors associated with adverse perinatal events.

Methods

The multicenter retrospective analysis was conducted in patients with PAS who delivered at three medical centers. Patients were classified according to whether they received general anesthesia (GA) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA). We compared the basic clinical characteristics of patients in the pre-propensity score matching (PSM) and post-PSM cohorts and identified factors associated with a high risk of adverse maternal outcomes.

Results

This study included a total of 425 patients, with 307 (72.2%) in the GA group and 118 (27.8%) in the NA group. After PSM, 162 patients were identified for analysis. In the post-matched cohort, the NA group exhibited shorter total operation time (P = 0.030) and postoperative length of hospital stay (P = 0.037). Additionally, the NA group experienced lower intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.001) and received fewer units of transfused packed red blood cells (PRBC) (P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that GA (P < 0.001), emergency cesarean delivery (P = 0.010), vascular lacunae within the placenta (P < 0.001), hypervascularity of uterine-placental margin (P = 0.002), hypervascularity of the cervix (P = 0.014), and balloon placement in the abdominal aorta (P < 0.001) were associated with a high risk of adverse maternal events.

Conclusion

In comparison to GA, cesarean delivery with NA in PAS patients appears to be associated with reduced intraoperative blood loss, PRBC transfusion, operating duration, and postoperative hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Silver RM, Langhoff-Roos J. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Epidemiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):265–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jauniaux E, Collins S, Burton GJ. Placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiology and evidence-based anatomy for prenatal ultrasound imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(1):75–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jauniaux E, Bunce C, Grønbeck L, Langhoff-Roos J. Prevalence and main outcomes of placenta accreta spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):208–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(1):210–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson SE, Richardson AL, Lucas DN. Neuraxial and general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2022;36(1):53–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Guglielminotti J, Landau R, Li G. Adverse events and factors associated with potentially avoidable use of general anesthesia in cesarean deliveries. Anesthesiology. 2019;130(6):912–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kearns RJ, Shaw M, Gromski PS, Iliodromiti S, Pell JP, Lawlor DA, Nelson SM. Neonatal and early childhood outcomes following maternal anesthesia for cesarean section: a population-based cohort study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46(6):482–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Angelo R, Smiley RM, Riley ET, Segal S. Serious complications related to obstetric anesthesia: the serious complication repository project of the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(6):1505–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guay J. The effect of neuraxial blocks on surgical blood loss and blood transfusion requirements: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18(2):124–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. McDonnell NJ, Paech MJ, Clavisi OM, Scott KL. Difficult and failed intubation in obstetric anaesthesia: an observational study of airway management and complications associated with general anaesthesia for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2008;17(4):292–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Markley JC, Farber MK, Perlman NC, Carusi DA. Neuraxial anesthesia during cesarean delivery for placenta previa with suspected morbidly adherent placenta: a retrospective analysis. Anesth Analg. 2018;127(4):930–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen-Lu N, Carvalho JC, Kingdom J, Windrim R, Allen L, Balki M. Mode of anesthesia and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing Cesarean delivery for invasive placentation: a retrospective cohort study of 50 consecutive cases. Can J Anaesth. 2016;63(11):1233–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor NJ, Russell R. Anaesthesia for abnormally invasive placenta: a single-institution case series. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2017;30:10–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Munoz JL, Pfeiffer AF, Curbelo J, Ramsey PS, Ireland KE. Neuraxial to general anesthesia conversion has equitable intraoperative and improved post-operative outcomes compared to general anesthesia in cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum (PAS). J Maternal-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):8640–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kayem G, Deneux-Tharaux C, Sentilhes L. PACCRETA: clinical situations at high risk of placenta ACCRETA/percreta: impact of diagnostic methods and management on maternal morbidity. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(4):476–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jauniaux E, Bhide A, Kennedy A, Woodward P, Hubinont C, Collins S. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):274–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chong YW, Zhang AQ, Wang Y, Liu ZH, Chen YS, Zhao YY. Value of ultrasonic scoring system for predicting risks of placenta accreta. Chin J Perinat Med. 2016;19(9):705–9.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Allen L, Jauniaux E, Hobson S, Papillon-Smith J, Belfort MA. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Nonconservative surgical management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):281–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Enste R, Cricchio P, Dewandre PY, Braun T, Leonards CO, Niggemann P, Spies C, Henrich W, Kaufner L. Placenta Accreta Spectrum Part I: anesthesia considerations based on an extended review of the literature. J Perinat Med. 2023;51(4):439–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Baghirzada L, Archer D, Walker A, Balki M. Anesthesia-related adverse events in obstetric patients: a population-based study in Canada. Can J Anaesth. 2022;69(1):72–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiniger CF, Einav S, Deutsch L, Ginosar Y, Ezra Y, Eid L. Outcomes of prospectively-collected consecutive cases of antenatal-suspected placenta accreta. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2013;22(4):273–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fiszer E, Weiniger CF. Placenta accrete: A review of current anesthetic considerations. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2022;36(1):157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Richman JM, Rowlingson AJ, Maine DN, Courpas GE, Weller JF, Wu CL. Does neuraxial anesthesia reduce intraoperative blood loss? A meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18(6):427–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Simmons SW, Dennis AT, Cyna AM, Richardson MG, Bright MR. Combined spinal-epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;10(10):8100.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hawkins R, Evans M, Hammond S, Hartopp R, Evans E. Placenta accreta spectrum disorders—Peri-operative management: The role of the anaesthetist. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;72:38–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ratnayake G, Patil V. General anaesthesia during caesarean sections: implications for the mother, foetus, anaesthetist and obstetrician. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019;31(6):393–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Finberg HJ, Williams JW. Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med. 1992;11(7):333–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang JI, Lim YK, Kim HS, Chang KH, Lee JP, Ryu HS. Sonographic findings of placental lacunae and the prediction of adherent placenta in women with placenta previa totalis and prior Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28(2):178–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu R, Chu R, Wang Q, Xu Y, Zhao Y, Tao G, Li Q, Ma Y. Role of abdominal aortic balloon placement in planned conservative management of placenta previa with placenta increta or percreta. Front Med. 2021;8: 767748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YL contributed to collecting and analyzing the data, and preparing the manuscript; critically revised the draft and approved the final version to be published. YM and RC contributed to designing, develo**, and refining the study protocol. NS, XS, QY, LL, MZ, YL, YX helped collect data and conduct the study. YM helped design and conduct the study. All authors contributed to the manuscript amendment.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanan Li or Yuyan Ma.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, C., Chu, R., Song, N. et al. Perinatal outcomes comparison between neuraxial and general anesthesia in pregnant women with placenta accreta spectrum: a multicenter retrospective study. J Anesth 38, 167–178 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03287-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03287-0

Keywords

Navigation