Log in

Prophylaxis for paediatric emergence delirium in desflurane-based anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The prevalence of postoperative emergence delirium in paediatric patients (pedED) following desflurane anaesthesia is considerably high at 50–80%. Although several pharmacological prophylactic strategies have been introduced to reduce the risk of pedED, conclusive evidence about the superiority of these individual regimens is lacking. The aim of the current study was to assess the potential prophylactic effect and safety of individual pharmacotherapies in the prevention of pedED following desflurane anaesthesia.

Methods

This frequentist model network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included peer-reviewed RCTs of either placebo-controlled or active-controlled design in paediatric patients under desflurane anaesthesia.

Results

Seven studies comprising 573 participants were included. Overall, the ketamine + propofol administration [odds ratio (OR) = 0.05, 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) 0.01–0.33], dexmedetomidine alone (OR = 0.13, 95%CIs 0.05–0.31), and propofol administration (OR = 0.30, 95%CIs 0.10–0.91) were associated with a significantly lower incidence of pedED than the placebo/control groups. In addition, only gabapentin and dexmedetomidine were associated with a significantly higher improvement in the severity of emergence delirium than the placebo/control groups. Finally, the ketamine + propofol administration was associated with the lowest incidence of pedED, whereas gabapentin was associated with the lowest severity of pedED among all of the pharmacologic interventions studied.

Conclusions

The current NMA showed that ketamine + propofol administration was associated with the lowest incidence of pedED among all of the pharmacologic interventions studied. Future large-scale trials to more fully elucidate the comparative benefits of different combination regimens are warranted.

Trial registration

PROSPERO CRD42021285200.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All the data of the current study were available upon reasonable request to the corresponding authors.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

Dex:

Dexmedetomidine

ES:

Effect size

FeMi:

Fentanyl + midazolam

Gab:

Gabapentin

GABA:

Gamma-aminobutyric acid

KeP:

Ketamine + propofol

Mid:

Midazolam

NMA:

Network meta-analysis

OR:

Odds ratio

pedED:

Postoperative emergence delirium in pediatric population

Pla:

Placebo/control

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Pro:

Propofol

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

SMD:

Standardized mean difference

SUCRA:

Surface under the cumulative ranking curve

References

  1. Klabusayova E, Musilova T, Fabian D, Skrisovska T, Vafek V, Kosinova M, Toukalkova M, Vrtkova A, Klucka J, Stourac P. Incidence of emergence delirium in the pediatric PACU: prospective observational trial. Children (Basel). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9101591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Demirbilek S, Togal T, Cicek M, Aslan U, Sizanli E, Ersoy MO. Effects of fentanyl on the incidence of emergence agitation in children receiving desflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004;21(7):538–42. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265021504007069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. White PF, Tang J, Wender RH, Yumul R, Stokes OJ, Sloninsky A, Naruse R, Kariger R, Norel E, Mandel S, Webb T, Zaentz A. Desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia: the effect on early versus late recovery and perioperative coughing. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(2):387–93. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181adc21a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Magni G, Rosa IL, Melillo G, Savio A, Rosa G. A comparison between sevoflurane and desflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(2):567–71. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ac1265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim BG, Lee IO, Ahn H, Lee DK, Won YJ, Kim HJ, Kim H. Comparison of the incidence of emergence agitation and emergence times between desflurane and sevoflurane anesthesia in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(38):e4927. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Grundmann U, Uth M, Eichner A, Wilhelm W, Larsen R. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil in paediatric patients: a comparison with a desflurane-nitrous oxide inhalation anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998;42(7):845–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05332.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Davis PJ, Cohen IT, McGowan FX Jr, Latta K. Recovery characteristics of desflurane versus halothane for maintenance of anesthesia in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesthesiology. 1994;80(2):298–302. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199402000-00009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen IT, Drewsen S, Hannallah RS. Propofol or midazolam do not reduce the incidence of emergence agitation associated with desflurane anaesthesia in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy. Paediatr Anaesth. 2002;12(7):604–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00903.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Welborn LG, Hannallah RS, Norden JM, Ruttimann UE, Callan CM. Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg. 1996;83(5):917–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199611000-00005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang HY, Chen TY, Li DJ, Lin PY, Su KP, Chiang MH, Carvalho AF, Stubbs B, Tu YK, Wu YC, Roerecke M, Smith L, Tseng PT, Hung KC. Association of pharmacological prophylaxis with the risk of pediatric emergence delirium after sevoflurane anesthesia: an updated network meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021;75:110488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim J, Kim SY, Lee JH, Kang YR, Koo BN. Low-dose dexmedetomidine reduces emergence agitation after desflurane anaesthesia in children undergoing strabismus surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(2):508–16. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.2.508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Makkar JK, Bhatia N, Bala I, Dwivedi D, Singh PM. A comparison of single dose dexmedetomidine with propofol for the prevention of emergence delirium after desflurane anaesthesia in children. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(1):50–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.13230.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins JP, Welton NJ. Network meta-analysis: a norm for comparative effectiveness? Lancet. 2015;386(9994):628–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61478-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hrobjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj. 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, Moher D, Tugwell P, Welch V, Kristjansson E, Henry DA. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. Bmj. 2017;358:j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Cipriani A, Furukawa TA, Salanti G, Chaimani A, Atkinson LZ, Ogawa Y, Leucht S, Ruhe HG, Turner EH, Higgins JPT, Egger M, Takeshima N, Hayasaka Y, Imai H, Shinohara K, Tajika A, Ioannidis JPA, Geddes JR. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018;391(10128):1357–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huhn M, Nikolakopoulou A, Schneider-Thoma J, Krause M, Samara M, Peter N, Arndt T, Backers L, Rothe P, Cipriani A, Davis J, Salanti G, Leucht S. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 32 oral antipsychotics for the acute treatment of adults with multi-episode schizophrenia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2019;394(10202):939–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31135-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration 2009.

  19. Cheng J, Pullenayegum E, Marshall JK, Iorio A, Thabane L. Impact of including or excluding both-armed zero-event studies on using standard meta-analysis methods for rare event outcome: a simulation study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(8):e010983. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tu YK. Use of generalized linear mixed models for network meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(7):911–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14545789.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23(20):3105–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. White IR. Network meta-analysis. Stata J. 2015;15:951–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kontopantelis E, Springate DA, Reeves D. A re-analysis of the Cochrane Library data: the dangers of unobserved heterogeneity in meta-analyses. PloS one. 2013;8(7):e69930. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Higgins JP, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Salanti G. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. Value Health. 2014;17(7):A324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chaimani A, Higgins JP, Mavridis D, Spyridonos P, Salanti G. Graphical tools for network meta-analysis in STATA. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76654. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076654.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Badawy AA, Kasem SA, Rashwan D, Al Menesy T, Adel G, Mokhtar AM, Badawy YA. The role of Gabapentin oral solution in decreasing desflurane associated emergence agitation and delirium in children after stabismus surgery, a prospective randomized double-blind study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):73. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-018-0533-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kararmaz A, Kaya S, Turhanoglu S, Ozyilmaz MA. Oral ketamine premedication can prevent emergence agitation in children after desflurane anaesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2004;14(6):477–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01224.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Song IA, Seo KS, Oh AY, Baik JS, Kim JH, Hwang JW, Jeon YT. Dexmedetomidine injection during strabismus surgery reduces emergence agitation without increasing the oculocardiac reflex in children: a randomized controlled trial. PloS one. 2016;11(9):e0162785. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Funk W, Jakob W, Riedl T, Taeger K. Oral preanaesthetic medication for children: double-blind randomized study of a combination of midazolam and ketamine vs midazolam or ketamine alone. Br J Anaesth. 2000;84(3):335–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013435.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fang XZ, Gao J, Ge YL, Zhou LJ, Zhang Y. Network meta-analysis on the efficacy of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, ketamine, propofol, and fentanyl for the prevention of sevoflurane-related emergence agitation in children. Am J Ther. 2016;23(4):e1032–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/MJT.0000000000000321.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Behm MO, Kearns GL. Treatment of pain with gabapentin in a neonate. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):482–4. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.2.482.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sacha GL, Foreman MG, Kyllonen K, Rodriguez RJ. The use of gabapentin for pain and agitation in neonates and infants in a neonatal ICU. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2017;22(3):207–11. https://doi.org/10.5863/1551-6776-22.3.207.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kong VK, Irwin MG. Gabapentin: a multimodal perioperative drug? Br J Anaesth. 2007;99(6):775–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Costi D, Ellwood J, Wallace A, Ahmed S, Waring L, Cyna A. Transition to propofol after sevoflurane anesthesia to prevent emergence agitation: a randomized controlled trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2015;25(5):517–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Costi D, Cyna AM, Ahmed S, Stephens K, Strickland P, Ellwood J, Larsson JN, Chooi C, Burgoyne LL, Middleton P. Effects of sevoflurane versus other general anaesthesia on emergence agitation in children. Cochrane Database Systematic Rev. 2014;9:CD007084. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007084.pub2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li LQ, Wang C, Xu HY, Lu HL, Zhang HZ. Effects of different doses of intranasal dexmedetomidine on preoperative sedation and postoperative agitation in pediatric with total intravenous anesthesia undergoing adenoidectomy with or without tonsillectomy. Medicine. 2018;97(39):e12140. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Tsiotou AG, Malisiova A, Kouptsova E, Mavri M, Anagnostopoulou M, Kalliardou E. Dexmedetomidine for the reduction of emergence delirium in children undergoing tonsillectomy with propofol anesthesia: a double-blind, randomized study. Paediatr Anaesth. 2018;28(7):632–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The current work did not receive any financial support. The authors of this work were supported by the following grants: Brendon Stubbs is supported by a Clinical Lectureship (ICA-CL-2017-03-001) jointly funded by Health Education England (HEE) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Brendon Stubbs is part funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. Brendon Stubbs is also supported by the Maudsley Charity, King’s College London and the NIHR South London Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) funding. The other authors did not receive any assistance, financial support or sponsorship. This paper presents independent research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the acknowledged institutions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HCK contributed as the first author and took the whole responsibility of manuscript drafting and data analysis. KCH contributed as the first author and study design, concept formation, data analysis, and drafting manuscript. HYW contributed as the first author and concept formation, manuscript revision, data validataion, data extraction, visualization, and manuscript drafting. BSZ contributed as the first author and took the whole responsibility of data extraction, data analysis, data approval, and manuscript drafting. TYC contributed in study design, concept formation, data extraction, and data analysis. DJL contributed in concept formation, method design, literature screen and selection. PYL contributed in data curation, data analysis, statitical process, and manuscript revision. KPS contributed in study design, data analysis, validation of data, and visualization. MHC contributed in concept formation, literature screen/selection, supervision of data extraction, and validation. AFC contributed in data curation and validation, visualization, and manuscript revision. BS contributed in concept formation, literature screen, and data extraction. YKT contributed in data analysis, data validation, data analysis, and supervision. YCW contributed in data analysis, visualization, manuscript revision, and data validatation. MR contributed in concept formation, study design, literature screen and selection. LS contributed in study design, manuscript revision, and data validation. SPH contributed in manuscript revision, supervision, and data extraction. YWC contributed in data analysis, data extraction, analysis process, and manuscript revision. PYY contributed in concept formation, study design, and manuscript revision. CWH contributed equally as the corresponding author and manuscript revision, data extraction, data analysis, and manuscript submission. PTT contributed equally as the corresponding author and manuscript revision, data analysis, data collection, and manuscript submission. MWS contributed equally as the corresponding author and manuscript revision, data analysis, data collection, and manuscript submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chih-Wei Hsu, Mein-Woei Suen or **-Tao Tseng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

The current study complies for the Institutional Review Board of the Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGHIRB: B-105-12). The current study did not direct involve individual participant so that we did not have the chance to approach individual participant or explore individual participant’s information. Therefore, it would be impossible to obtain Consent to Participate in the current study.

Consent for publication

The current study did not direct involve individual participant so that we did not have the chance to approach individual participant or explore individual participant’s information. Therefore, it would be impossible to obtain Consent to Publish in the current study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PPTX 605 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 178 KB)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuo, HC., Hung, KC., Wang, HY. et al. Prophylaxis for paediatric emergence delirium in desflurane-based anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis. J Anesth 38, 155–166 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03219-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-023-03219-y

Keywords

Navigation