Log in

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy vs. radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of primary aldosteronism. A single center retrospective cohort analysis adjusted with propensity score

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the gold standard treatment for unilateral primary aldosteronism. However, satisfactory results have also been published with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The aim of this study was to compare LA and RFA for the treatment of primary aldosteronism.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of the patients who underwent LA or RFA in a single center was performed. Morbidity and long-term effectiveness (cure rate and blood pressure control) were analyzed. A multivariate analysis with a propensity score was also performed.

Results

Thirty-four patients were included in the study, 24 in the LA group and 10 in the RFA group. Hypertension had been diagnosed a median of 12 years before the intervention. Hypertension was properly controlled before the intervention in 55.9% of the patients. Hypertensive crisis was more common during RFA (4.2% vs. 70.0%, p < 0.001), although no patient suffered any complication because of these crises. LA was longer (174.6 vs. 105.5 min, p = 0.001) and had a longer length of stay (median 2 vs 1 days, p < 0.001). No severe complications were observed in any of the patients. After a median follow-up of 46.2 months, more patients had hypertension cured and blood pressure controlled in the LA group (29.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.078 and 95.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.006, respectively). Also, patients in the LA group were taking less antihypertensive drugs (1.8 vs. 3.0, p = 0.054) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (41.7% vs. 90.0%, p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis adjusted by propensity score showed that LA had an OR = 11.3 (p = 0.138) for hypertension cure and an OR = 55.1 (p = 0.040) for blood pressure control.

Conclusions

Although RFA was a less invasive procedure than LA, hypertension was cured and blood pressure was properly controlled in more patients from the LA group. Patients who underwent LA were taking less antihypertensive drugs than patients who had undergone RFA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Conn JW (1955) Presidential address I. Painting background. II. Primary aldosteronism, a new clinical syndrome. J Lab Clin Med 45:3–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Conn JW, Louis LH (1956) Primary aldosteronism, a new clinical entity. Ann Intern Med 44:1–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gagner M, Lacroix A, Bolte E (1992) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 327:1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. McManus C, Kuo JH (2020) Surgical approach to patients with primary aldosteronism. Gland Surg 9:25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Funder JW, Carey RM, Mantero F, et al. 2016 The management of primary aldosteronism: case detection, diagnosis, and treatment: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101(5): 1889–1916

  6. Kigure T, Harada T, Satoh Y, Fujieda N, Wakayama Y (1996) Microwave ablation of the adrenal gland: experimental study and clinical application. Br J Urol 77:215–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu SY, Chu CC, Tsui TK et al (2016) Aldosterone-producing adenoma in primary aldosteronism: CT-guided radiofrequency ablation-long-term results and recurrence rate. Radiology 281:625–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu SY, Chu CM, Kong AP et al (2016) Radiofrequency ablation compared with laparoscopic adrenalectomy for aldosterone-producing adenoma. Br J Surg 103:1476–1486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sarwar A, Brook OR, Vaidya A et al (2016) Clinical outcomes following percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma: comparison with adrenalectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 27:961–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang MH, Tyan YS, Huang YH, Wang SC, Chen SL (2016) Comparison of radiofrequency ablation versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy for benign aldosterone-producing adenoma. Radiol Med 121:811–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang R, Xu L, Lian H, Gan W, Guo H (2014) Retroperitoneoscopic-guided cool-tip radiofrequency ablation of adrenocortical aldosteronoma. J Endourol 28:1208–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shimamoto K, Fujita T, Ito S et al (2008) Impact of blood pressure control on cardiovascular events in 26,512 Japanese hypertensive patients: the Japan hypertension evaluation with angiotensin II antagonist losartan therapy (J-HEALTH) study, a prospective nationwide observational study. Hypertens Res 31:469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Control hypertension to prevent cardiovascular complications (2007) 24/7 blood pressure control helps reduce stroke risk, especially during the early morning hours, when the incidence is greatest. Heart Advis 10:4–5

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gaciong Z, Sinski M, Lewandowski J (2013) Blood pressure control and primary prevention of stroke: summary of the recent clinical trial data and meta-analyses. Curr Hypertens Rep 15:559–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kjeldsen SE, Narkiewicz K, Burnier M, Oparil S (2019) Systolic blood pressure control prevents cognitive decline and slows development of white matter lesions in the brain: the SPRINT MIND study outcomes. Blood Press 28:356–357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamazaki Y, Nakamura Y, Omata K et al (2017) Histopathological classification of cross-sectional image-negative hyperaldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:1182–1192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Volpe C, Hamberger B, Hoog A et al (2015) Primary aldosteronism: functional histopathology and long-term follow-up after unilateral adrenalectomy. Clin Endocrinol 82:639–647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nanba AT, Nanba K, Byrd JB et al (2017) Discordance between imaging and immunohistochemistry in unilateral primary aldosteronism. Clin Endocrinol 87:665–672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Williams TA, Gómez-Sánchez CE, Rainey WE et al (2021) International histopathology consensus for unilateral primary aldosteronism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 106:42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liang KW, Jahangiri Y, Tsao TF, Tyan YS, Huang HH (2019) Effectiveness of thermal ablation for aldosterone-producing adrenal adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and biochemical parameters. J Vasc Interv Radiol 30:1335–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaffe G, Gray Z, Krishnan G et al (2020) Screening rates for primary aldosteronism in resistant hypertension: a cohort study. Hypertension 75:650–659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vorselaars W, van Beek DJ, Suurd DPD et al (2020) Adrenalectomy for primary aldosteronism: significant variability in work-up strategies and low guideline adherence in worldwide daily clinical practice. World J Surg 44:1905–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Cano-Valderrama.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Oscar Cano-Valderrama, Jimena González-Nieto, María Abad-Cardiel, Santiago Ochagavía, Isabelle Rünkle, José V. Méndez, José A. García-Donaire, Martín Cuesta-Hernández, Javier E. Armijo, Paz Miguel-Novoa, Antonio J. Torres and Nieves Martell-Claros have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cano-Valderrama, O., González-Nieto, J., Abad-Cardiel, M. et al. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy vs. radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of primary aldosteronism. A single center retrospective cohort analysis adjusted with propensity score. Surg Endosc 36, 1970–1978 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08481-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08481-3

Keywords

Navigation