Abstract
A central challenge of auditory processing involves the segregation, analysis, and integration of acoustic information into auditory perceptual objects for processing by higher order cognitive operations. This study explores the influence of low-level features on auditory object perception. Participants provided perceived musicality ratings in response to randomly generated pure tone sequences. Previous work has shown that music perception relies on the integration of discrete sounds into a holistic structure. Hence, high (versus low) ratings were viewed as indicative of strong (versus weak) object formation. Additionally, participants rated sequences in which random subsets of tones were manipulated along one of three low-level dimensions (timbre, amplitude, or fade-in) at one of three strengths (low, medium, or high). Our primary findings demonstrate how low-level acoustic features modulate the perception of auditory objects, as measured by changes in musicality ratings for manipulated sequences. Secondarily, we used principal component analysis to categorize participants into subgroups based on differential sensitivities to low-level auditory dimensions, thereby highlighting the importance of individual differences in auditory perception. Finally, we report asymmetries regarding the effects of low-level dimensions; specifically, the perceptual significance of timbre. Together, these data contribute to our understanding of how low-level auditory features modulate auditory object perception.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Janabi, S., & Greenberg, A. S. (2016). Target–object integration, attention distribution, and object orientation interactively modulate object-based selection. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1968–1984. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1126-3.
Barnas, A. J., & Greenberg, A. S. (2016). Visual field meridians modulate the reallocation of object-based attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1985–1997. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1116-5.
Bey, C., & McAdams, S. (2003). Postrecognition of interleaved melodies as an indirect measure of auditory stream formation. J Exp Psychol Human, 29, 267–279.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: the perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
Bregman, A. S. (2015). Progress in understanding auditory scene analysis. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 33(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2015.33.1.12.
Bregman, A. S., Ahad, P. A., Crum, P. A., & OReilly, J. (2000). Effects of time intervals and tone durations on auditory stream segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 626–636.
Carlyon, R. P., Cusack, R., Foxton, J. M., & Robertson, I. H. (2001). Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 115–127.
Carrión, R., & Bly, B. (2008). The effects of learning on event-related potential correlates of musical expectancy. Psychophysiology, 45(5), 759–775.
Cross, I. (2013). Music and biocultural evolution. In M. Clayton, T. Herbert, & R. Middleton (Eds.), The cultural study of music (pp. 39–49). Abingdon: Routledge.
Cross, I., Howell, P., & West, R. (1983). Preferences for scale structure in melodic sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9(3), 444–460.
Cusack, R., Deeks, J., Aikman, G., & Carlyon, R. P. (2004). Effects of location, frequency region, and time course of selective attention on auditory scene analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 643–656.
Cusack, R., & Roberts, B. (2000). Effects of differences in timbre on sequential grou**. Perceptron Psychophysics, 62, 1112–1120.
Dannenbring, G. L., & Bregman, A. S. (1976). Effect of silence between tones on auditory stream segregation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59, 987–989.
Darwin, C. J. (1997). Auditory grou**. Trends Cognition of Sciences, 1, 327–333.
Darwin, C., & Hukin, R. (2000). Effectiveness of spatial cues, prosody, and talker characteristics in selective attention. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 970–977.
Deutsch, D. (2013). The Psychology of Music (3rd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.
Duifhuis, H., Willems, L. F., & Sluyter, R. (1982). Measurement of pitch in speech: An implementation of goldsteins theory of pitch perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 1568–1580.
Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(4), 501–517. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.113.4.501.
Egly, R., Driver, J., & Rafal, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.123.2.161.
Ellis, R. J., Norton, A. C., Overy, K., Winner, E., Alsop, D. C., & Schlaug, G. (2012). Differentiating maturational and training influences on fMRI activation during music processing. NeuroImage, 60, 1902–1912.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.41.4.1149.
Fiveash, A., Thompson, W. F., Badcock, N. A., & Mcarthur, G. (2018). Syntactic processing in music and language: Effects of interrupting auditory streams with alternating timbres. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 129, 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.05.003.
Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9240–9245.
Greenberg, A.S. (2009). Uncertainty as a Guiding Principle in the Strategic Allocation of Attention to Objects, Ph.D. Thesis, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. [ProQuest Publication No. AAT 3410160]
Greenberg, A. S., & Gmeindl, L. (2008). Strategic control of attention to objects and locations. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(3), 564–565. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.4386-07.2008.
Greenberg, A. S., Rosen, M., Cutrone, E., & Behrmann, M. (2015). The effects of visual search efficiency on object-based attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(5), 1544–1557. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0892-.
Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Revies Neuroscience, 5, 887–892.
Grimault, N., Bacon, S. P., & Micheyl, C. (2002). Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1340–1348.
Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge: MIT press.
Hyde, K. L., Lerch, J., Norton, A., Forgeard, M., Winner, E., Evans, A. C., & Schlaug, G. (2009). Musical training shapes structural brain development. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 3019–3025.
Irvine, D. R. (2018). Plasticity in the auditory system. Hearing Research, 362, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2017.10.011.
Koelsch, S. (2011). Toward a neural basis of music perception—A review and updated model. Frontier in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00110.
Koelsch, S., & Jentschke, S. (2008). Short-term effects of processing musical syntax: An ERP study. Brain Research, 1212, 55–62.
Koelsch, S., & Siebel, W. A. (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 578–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.001.
Koffka, K., & Hartshorne, C. S. (1935). The philosophy and psychology of sensation. The American Journal of Psychology, 47(4), 716. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416027.
Krueger, Joel. (2011). Doing things with music. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 1–22.
Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80, 97–126.
Kulkarni, M., Potkonjak, K., Randall, R., & Greenberg A.S. (2020). Music expertise alters the perception of auditory objects. PsyAr**v. Web
Lahav, A., Saltzman, E., & Schlaug, G. (2007). Action representation of sound: Audiomotor recognition network while listening to newly acquired actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 308–314.
Lawrance, E. L., Harper, N. S., Cooke, J. E., & Schnupp, J. W. (2014). Temporal predictability enhances auditory detection. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4879667.
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology., 140, 1–55.
Margulis, E. H., & Simchy-Gross, R. (2016). Repetition enhances the musicality of randomly generated tone sequences. Music Perception, 33(4), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2016.33.4.509.
Marozeau, J., Innes-Brown, H., & Blamey, P. J. (2013). The effect of timbre and loudness on melody segregation. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 30(3), 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2012.30.3.259.
Mehr, S. A., Singh, M., Knox, D., Ketter, D. M., Pickens-Jones, D., Atwood, S., … Glowacki, L. (2019). Universality and diversity in human song. Science, 366(6468), eaax0868. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax0868.
Micheyl, C., & Oxenham, A. J. (2010). Objective and subjective psychophysical measures of auditory stream integration and segregation. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 11(4), 709–724.
Moore, B. C. J., & Gockel, H. (2002). Factors influencing sequential stream segregation. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 88, 320–333.
Moore, B. C., & Gockel, H. E. (2012). Properties of auditory stream formation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1591), 919–931. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0355.
Mutschler, I., Schultze-Bonhage, A., Glauche, V., Demandt, E., Speck, O., & Ball, T. (2007). A rapid sound–action association effect in human insular cortex. PLoS One, 2, e259.
Nelken, I. (2004). Processing of complex stimuli and natural scenes in the auditory cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(4), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.06.005.
Nicora, G., Greenberg, A.S. (2018). Object Closure Modulates the Strength of Object- Based Attentional Filtering. PsyAr**v. Web
Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Palmer, E. M., Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (2006). A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 135, 515–541.
Patel, A. D. (2010). Music, language, and the brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
Peterson, M. A., & Kimchi, R. (2013). Perceptual Organization. In D. Reisberg (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 9–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rajendran, V. G., Harper, N. S., Willmore, B. D., Hartmann, W. M., & Schnupp, J. W. (2013). Temporal predictability as a grou** cue in the perception of auditory streams. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4811161.
Randall, R., Greenberg, A. S. (2016). Principal Component Analysis of Musicality in Pitch Sequences. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, San Francisco, CA, pp 112–118.
Rasch, R. A. (1978). The perception of simultaneous notes such as in polyphonic music. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 40, 21–33.
Rodrigues, A. C., Loureiro, M. A., & Caramelli, P. (2010). Musical training, neuroplasticity and cognition. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 4(4), 277–286. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-57642010dn40400005.
Al-Janabi, S., Strommer-Davidovich, N., Gabay, S., & Greenberg, A. G. (2020). Object- based attentional selection emerges late in the visual cortical hierarchy for objects of varying perceptual strength. Web: BioAr**v.
Schmuckler, M. A. (1989). Expectation in music: Investigation of melodic and harmonic processes. Music Perception, 7, 109–150.
Schreiner, C. E., & Polley, D. B. (2014). Auditory map plasticity: Diversity in causes and consequences. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 24, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2013.11.009.
Seydell-Greenwald, A., Greenberg, A. S., & Rauschecker, J. P. (2013). Are you listening? Brain activation associated with sustained nonspatial auditory attention in the presence and absence of stimulation. Human Brain Map**, 35(5), 2233–2252. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22323.
Shamma, S. A., Elhilali, M., & Micheyl, C. (2011). Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis. Trends in Neurosciences, 34, 114–123.
Shepard, K. N., Kilgard, M. P., & Liu, R. C. (2012). Experience-dependent plasticity and auditory cortex. Neural Correlates of Auditory Cognition Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2350-8_10.
Shinn-Cunningham, B. G. (2008). Object-based auditory and visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.003.
Shinn-Cunningham, B. G., & Best, V. (2008). Selective Attention in Normal and Impaired Hearing. Trends in Amplification, 12(4), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713808325306.
Snyder, J. S., Carter, O. L., Lee, S.-K., Hannon, E. E., & Alain, C. (2008). Effects of context on auditory stream segregation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(4), 1007–1016.
Szalárdy, O., Bendixen, A., Böhm, T. M., Davies, L. A., Denham, S. L., & Winkler, I. (2014). The effects of rhythm and melody on auditory stream segregation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135(3), 1392–1405. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4865196.
Torgerson, W. S. (1958). Theory and methods of scaling. New York: Wiley.
van Noorden, L.P.A.S. (1975). Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences. Institute for Perceptual Research.
Wayland, R., Herrera, E., & Kaan, E. (2010). Effects of musical experience and training on pitch contour perception. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 654–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2010.10.001.
Wertheimer, M. (1924). Gestalt Theory. In: E. D. Ellis Address Before the Kant Society, Berlin, 7th December, 1924; reprinted in Wertheimer M (1950) in A Sourcebook of Gestalt Psychology, (Humanities, New York) (pp 1–11).
Winkler, I., Denham, S. L., & Nelken, I. (2009). Modeling the auditory scene: predictive regularity representations and perceptual objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 532–540.
Wong, P. C., Ciocca, V., Chan, A. H., Ha, L. Y., Tan, L., & Peretz, I. (2012). Effects of culture on musical pitch perception. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0033424.
Yost, W. A. (1994). Fundamentals of hearing: An introduction. Cambridge: Academic Press.
Zimmermann, J. F., Moscovitch, M., & Alain, C. (2016). Attending to auditory memory. Brain Research, 1640, 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.11.032.
Funding
This research was supported by a Rothberg Research Award in Human Brain Imaging (R.R.), NIH Grant number T32-MH19983 (A.S.G.) and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Research Growth Initiative (A.S.G.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments.
Informed consent
Participants provided informed consent prior to the experiment in accordance with standards set forth by the Institutional Review Board of Carnegie Mellon University.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurariy, G., Randall, R. & Greenberg, A.S. Manipulation of low-level features modulates grou** strength of auditory objects. Psychological Research 85, 2256–2270 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01391-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01391-4