Log in

Improved anastomotic technique for esophagojejunal anastomosis using circular stapler

  • How-I-Do-It articles
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In total gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y reconstruction with esophagojejunal anastomosis has been widely used in gastrointestinal reconstruction. In the case of anastomotic leakage of RY reconstruction, esophagojejunal anastomosis should be paid attention, and esophageal fragility is considered the reason for the leakage. Here, we introduce an atraumatic and innovative technique for esophagojejunostomy.

Methods

We prospectively performed routine novel esophagojejunal anastomosis using circular stapler device and reviewed the records of 14 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent open total gastrectomy at Kitasato University Hospital from April 2019 to March 2020. By placing about 10 stay sutures around the entire esophageal stump, the esophageal stump can be opened to the maximum diameter. The forceps gras** the tissue was not necessary for these procedures, consequently preventing either tears the esophageal stump tissue or narrowing the esophageal lumen.

Results

These 14 cases were far advanced cases of gastric cancer, 6 cases of splenectomy and 3 cases of distal pancreatectomy. No technical problems such as esophageal tear were observed in all cases. Postoperative complications were observed in 6 patients (42.9%), and their contents varied. However, they all improved conservatively. Regarding anastomotic complications, anastomotic leakage of Clavien-Dindo-II was observed in one case, but it improved conservatively.

Conclusion

Our new atraumatic anastomosis technique could abolish problems such as tear of esophagus wall due to introduce a larger-sized anvil, trauma of esophageal wall by gras** with forceps such as Alice or Babcock. Consequently, the atraumatic and innovative technique might make the esophagojejunostomy safe. This method might prevent anastomotic leakage and other complications effectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sitarz R, Skierucha M, Mielko J et al (2018) Gastric cancer: epidemiology, prevention, classification, and treatment. Cancer Manag Res 10:239–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurokawa Y, Katai H, Fukuda H et al (2008) Phase II study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0703. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38(7):501–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hiki N, Katai H, Mizusawa J et al (2018) Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG0703). Gastric Cancer 21(1):155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H et al (2019) Single-arm confirmatory trial of laparoscopy-assisted total or proximal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG1401. Gastric Cancer 22(5):999–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00929-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sowa M, Kato Y, Nakanishi I et al (1992) Complications of total gastrectomy for gastric cancer–with special reference to anastomotic failure. Anticancer Res 12(5):1427–1430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schietroma M, Cecilia EM, Carlei F et al (2013) Prevention of anastomotic leakage after total gastrectomy with perioperative supplemental oxygen administration: a prospective randomized, double-blind, controlled, single-center trial. Ann Surg Oncol 20(5):1584–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nomura S, Sasako M, Hitoshi Katai H et al (2000) Decreasing complication rates with stapled esophagojejunostomy following a learning curve. Gastric Cancer 3(2):97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe M, Miyata H, Gotoh M et al (2014) Total gastrectomy risk model: data from 20,011 Japanese patients in a nationwide internet-based database. Ann Surg 260(6):1034–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Yamaguchi T et al (2007) Laparoscopic esophagogastric circular stapled anastomosis: a modified technique to protect the esophagus. Gastric Cancer 10:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishikawa K, Yanaga K, Kashiwagi H et al (2010) Significance of intraoperative endoscopy in total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 24(10):2633–2636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mariette C, De Botton M-L, Piessen G (2012) Surgery in esophageal and gastric cancer patients: what is the role for nutrition support in your daily practice? Ann Surg Oncol 19(7):2128–2134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Makuuchi R, Irino T, Tanizawa Y et al (2019) Esophagojejunal anastomotic leakage following gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Today 49(3):187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Marano L, Porfidia R, Pezzella M et al (2013) Clinical and immunological impact of early postoperative enteral immunonutrition after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg Oncol 20:3912–3918

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Niihara.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 387642 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niihara, M., Hiki, N., Hosoda, K. et al. Improved anastomotic technique for esophagojejunal anastomosis using circular stapler. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407, 353–356 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02417-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02417-0

Keywords

Navigation