Abstract
Introduction
Cost efficiency is important for hospitals in order to provide high-quality health care for all patients. As hemihepatectomies are increasingly being performed laparoscopically, the aims of this study were to evaluate the costs of laparoscopic hemihepatectomy and to compare them to conventional open techniques.
Patients and methods
This is a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes and financial calculations of all patients who underwent hemihepatectomy between January 2015 and December 2016 at the Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Charité Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany, being allocated to the DRG (diagnosis-related group) H01A (complex operations of the liver and pancreas with complex intensive care treatment) or H01B (operations of the liver and pancreas without complex intensive care treatment). To overcome selection bias, a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was performed.
Results
After PSM, a total of 64 patients were identified; 32 patients underwent laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LH); and 32 patients received open hemihepatectomy (OH). After PSM, no significant differences were observed in clinical baseline characteristics. The duration of surgery was significantly longer for patients undergoing LH compared to OH (LH, 334 min, 186–655 min; OH, 274 min, 176–454 min; p = 0.005). Patients in the LH group had a significantly shortened median hospital stay of 5 d, when compared to OH (LH, 9.5 d, 3–35 d; OH, 14.5 d, 7–37d; p = 0.005). We observed a significant higher rate of postoperative complication in the OH group (p = 0.022). Cost analysis showed median overall costs of 17,369.85€ in the LH group and 16,103.64€ in the OH group (p = 0.390).
Conclusion
Our data suggest that higher intraoperative costs of laparoscopic liver surgery, e.g., for surgical devices and due to longer operation times, are compensated by fewer postoperative complications and consecutive shorter length of stay when compared with OH.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Piqué JM, Delgado S, Campo E, Bordas JM et al (1995) Short-term outcome analysis of a randomized study comparing laparoscopic vs open colectomy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 9(10):1101–1105
Schwenk W, Böhm B, Müller JM (1998) Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections. A prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 12(9):1131–1136
Beppu T, Wakabayashi G, Hasegawa K, Gotohda N, Mizuguchi T, Takahashi Y, Hirokawa F, Taniai N, Watanabe M, Katou M, Nagano H, Honda G, Baba H, Kokudo N, Konishi M, Hirata K, Yamamoto M, Uchiyama K, Uchida E, Kusachi S, Kubota K, Mori M, Takahashi K, Kikuchi K, Miyata H, Takahara T, Nakamura M, Kaneko H, Yamaue H, Miyazaki M, Takada T (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(10):711–720
Parks KR, Kuo Y-H, Davis JM, O’ Brien B, Hagopian EJ (2014) Laparoscopic versus open liver resection: a meta-analysis of long-term outcome. HPB (Oxford) 16(2):109–118
Okuno M, Goumard C, Mizuno T, Omichi K, Tzeng CD, Chun YS et al (2017) Operative and short-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases located in the posterosuperior liver: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc [zitiert 16. Januar 2018]; Verfügbar unter: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/28917012
Ahn KS, Kang KJ, Kim YH, Kim T-S, Lim TJ (2014) A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 24(12):872–877
Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okamoto K, Toshimitsu Y, Okada K, Ueno Y, Yamaguchi S, Koyama I (2012) Single-port laparoscopic hepatectomy: technique, safety, and feasibility in a clinical case series. Surg Endosc 26(6):1696–1701
Sotiropoulos GC, Prodromidou A, Machairas N (2017) Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: the European experience. J BUON 22(5):1160–1171
Vanounou T, Steel JL, Nguyen KT, Tsung A, Marsh JW, Geller DA, Gamblin TC (2010) Comparing the clinical and economic impact of laparoscopic versus open liver resection. Ann Surg Oncol 17(4):998–1009
Dokmak S, Raut V, Aussilhou B, Ftériche FS, Farges O, Sauvanet A, Belghiti J (2014) Laparoscopic left lateral resection is the gold standard for benign liver lesions: a case–control study. HPB (Oxford) 16(2):183–187
Cipriani F, Ratti F, Cardella A, Catena M, Paganelli M, Aldrighetti L (2019) Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness in a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04112-4
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196
Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Syed S, Wiltshire R, Dimovska E, Turner D et al (2013) Assessment of the financial implications for laparoscopic liver surgery: a single-centre UK cost analysis for minor and major hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 27(7):2542–2550
Cannon RM, Scoggins CR, Callender GG, Quillo A, McMasters KM, Martin RCG (2013) Financial comparison of laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection using deviation-based cost modeling. Ann Surg Oncol 20(9):2887–2892
Schemmer P, Bruns H, Weitz J, Schmidt J, Büchler MW (2008) Liver transection using vascular stapler: a review. HPB (Oxford) 10(4):249–252
Rahbari NN, Elbers H, Koch M, Vogler P, Striebel F, Bruckner T, Mehrabi A, Schemmer P, Büchler MW, Weitz J (2014) Randomized clinical trial of stapler versus clamp-crushing transection in elective liver resection. Br J Surg 101(3):200–207
Bhojani FD, Fox A, Pitzul K, Gallinger S, Wei A, Moulton C-A, Okrainec A, Cleary SP (2012) Clinical and economic comparison of laparoscopic to open liver resections using a 2-to-1 matched pair analysis: an institutional experience. J Am Coll Surg 214(2):184–195
Stoot JHMB, van Dam RM, Coelen RJS, Winkens B, Olde Damink SWM, Bemelmans MHA et al (2012) The introduction of a laparoscopic liver surgery programme: a cost analysis of initial experience in a university hospital. Scand J Surg 101(1):32–37
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and informed consent
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Institutional review board approval (application no. EA2/006/16) was obtained before analysis of the data. Approval from the local ethics committee includes the usage and publication of those retrospectively analyzed data. Due to the blinded data and retrospective design, written informed consent was not considered necessary by the ethics committee.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wabitsch, S., Kästner, A., Haber, P.K. et al. Laparoscopic versus open hemihepatectomy—a cost analysis after propensity score matching. Langenbecks Arch Surg 404, 469–475 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01790-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-019-01790-1