Abstract
Purpose
The recent development of a portable investigational handheld OCT-angiography (OCTA) device has allowed for expansion of imaging into the operating room (OR) in addition to standard in-clinic imaging. The aim of this study was to assess intravisit repeatability and intervisit reproducibility of retinal microvasculature measures and central retinal thickness for in-clinic table-top and portable OR compatible OCTA devices.
Methods
Repeated 10 × 10 OCTA images were acquired in 20 healthy adult participants on two separate visit days using Spectralis spectral-domain OCTA table-top and investigational armature suspended Flex systems. Intravisit and intervisit intraclass correlation coefficients and average absolute percent difference were calculated for quantitative microvasculature measures and CRT.
Results
120 OCTA images were acquired from 20 subjects (n = 20, mean age 26.7 ± 1.61 years, range 24–30 years) with both devices across two separate imaging days. FAZ and CRT measurements had near complete intravisit and intervisit agreement with ICCs between .97 and 1 for both table-top (FAZ ICC .97, .97; CRT ICC .98–1, .98–.99) and Flex (FAZ ICC .97, .95; CRT ICC .99–1, .98–.99) devices. Vessel density measures demonstrated greater variance with only fair to strong agreement (ICC .32–.75) and average absolute percent differences ranging from 2.96 to 6.63%.
Conclusion
FAZ and CRT measures for both devices demonstrated high repeatability and reproducibility; retinal vessel density measures demonstrated less. Differences of less than 7% for retinal microvasculature measurements across time and devices are most likely attributable to expectable variance between repeat scans.
![](http://media.springernature.com/lw685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00417-023-06351-3/MediaObjects/417_2023_6351_Figa_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00417-023-06351-3/MediaObjects/417_2023_6351_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00417-023-06351-3/MediaObjects/417_2023_6351_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wang RK, Jacques SL, Ma Z, Hurst S, Hanson SR, Gruber A (2007) Three dimensional optical angiography. Opt Express 15:4083–4097. https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.15.004083
Chu Z, Lin J, Gao C, **n C, Zhang Q, Chen CL, Roisman L, Gregori G, Rosenfeld PJ, Wang RK (2016) Quantitative assessment of the retinal microvasculature using optical coherence tomography angiography. J Biomed Opt 21:66008. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.Jbo.21.6.066008
Carrasco-Zevallos OM, Viehland C, Keller B, Draelos M, Kuo AN, Toth CA, Izatt JA (2017) Review of intraoperative optical coherence tomography: technology and applications [Invited]. Biomed Opt Express 8:1607–1637. https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.8.001607
Chen X, Viehland C, Carrasco-Zevallos OM, Keller B, Vajzovic L, Izatt JA, Toth CA (2017) Microscope-integrated optical coherence tomography angiography in the operating room in young children with retinal vascular disease. JAMA Ophthalmol 135:483–486. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.0422
Viehland C, Chen X, Tran-Viet D, Jackson-Atogi M, Ortiz P, Waterman G, Vajzovic L, Toth CA, Izatt JA (2019) Ergonomic handheld OCT angiography probe optimized for pediatric and supine imaging. Biomed Opt Express 10:2623–2638. https://doi.org/10.1364/boe.10.002623
Rocholz R, Teussink MM, Dolz-Marco R, Holzhey C, Dechent JF, Tafreshi A, Schulz S (2018) Spectralis optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA): principles and clinical applications https://www.academy.heidelbergengineering.com/hedata/e-learning/Totara/Dateien/pdf-tutorials/210111-001_SPECTRALIS%20OCTA%20-%20Principles%20and%20Clinical%20Applications_EN.pdf Accessed 21 Nov 2023
Hsu ST, Ngo HT, Stinnett SS, Cheung NL, House RJ, Kelly MP, Chen X, Enyedi LB, Prakalapakorn SG, Materin MA, El-Dairi MA, Jaffe GJ, Freedman SF, Toth CA, Vajzovic L (2019) Assessment of macular microvasculature in healthy eyes of infants and children using OCT angiography. Ophthalmology 126:1703–1711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.06.028
McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med 22:276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
Comyn O, Heng LZ, Ikeji F, Bibi K, Hykin PG, Bainbridge JW, Patel PJ (2012) Repeatability of Spectralis OCT measurements of macular thickness and volume in diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:7754–7759. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10895
Giani A, Deiro AP, Staurenghi G (2012) Repeatability and reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography using different scan parameters. Retina 32:1007–1012. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0b013e31822f5660
Zhao Q, Yang WL, Wang XN, Wang RK, You QS, Chu ZD, **n C, Zhang MY, Li DJ, Wang ZY, Chen W, Li YF, Cui R, Shen L, Wei WB (2018) Repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative assessment of the retinal microvasculature using optical coherence tomography angiography based on optical microangiography. Biomed Environ Sci 31:407–412. https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2018.054
La Spina C, Carnevali A, Marchese A, Querques G, Bandello F (2017) Reproducibility and reliability of optical coherence tomography angiography for foveal avascular zone evaluation and measurement in different settings. Retina 37:1636–1641. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000001426
Pilotto E, Frizziero L, Crepaldi A, Della Dora E, Deganello D, Longhin E, Convento E, Parrozzani R, Midena E (2018) Repeatability and reproducibility of foveal avascular zone area measurement on normal eyes by different optical coherence tomography angiography instruments. Ophthalmic Res 59:206–211. https://doi.org/10.1159/000485463
Shiihara H, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Kakiuchi N, Otsuka H, Terasaki H, Sonoda S (2017) Reproducibility and differences in area of foveal avascular zone measured by three different optical coherence tomographic angiography instruments. Sci Rep 7:9853. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09255-5
Lee JC, Grisafe DJ, Burkemper B, Chang BR, Zhou X, Chu Z, Fard A, Durbin M, Wong BJ, Song BJ, Xu BY, Wang R, Richter GM (2020) Intrasession repeatability and intersession reproducibility of peripapillary OCTA vessel parameters in non-glaucomatous and glaucomatous eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317181
Lei J, Durbin MK, Shi Y, Uji A, Balasubramanian S, Baghdasaryan E, Al-Sheikh M, Sadda SR (2017) Repeatability and reproducibility of superficial macular retinal vessel density measurements using optical coherence tomography angiography en face images. JAMA Ophthalmol 135:1092–1098. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3431
Lei J, Pei C, Wen C, Abdelfattah NS (2018) Repeatability and reproducibility of quantification of superficial peri-papillary capillaries by four different optical coherence tomography angiography devices. Sci Rep 8:17866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36279-2
Brücher VC, Storp JJ, Eter N, Alnawaiseh M (2020) Optical coherence tomography angiography-derived flow density: a review of the influencing factors. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 258:701–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04553-2
Alnawaiseh M, Lahme L, Treder M, Rosentreter A, Eter N (2017) Short-term effects of exercise on optic nerve and macular perfusion measured by optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 37:1642–1646. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000001419
Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK, Sadda SR, Staurenghi G (2018) Optical coherence tomography angiography. Prog Retin Eye Res 64:1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.preteyeres.2017.11.003
Han IC, Tadarati M, Scott AW (2015) Macular vascular abnormalities identified by optical coherence tomographic angiography in patients with sickle cell disease. JAMA Ophthalmol 133:1337–1340. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.2824
Liu TYA, Han IC, Goldberg MF, Linz MO, Chen CJ, Scott AW (2018) Multimodal retinal imaging in incontinentia pigmenti including optical coherence tomography angiography: findings from an older cohort with mild phenotype. JAMA Ophthalmol 136:467–472. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0475
Schwartz R, Sivaprasad S, Macphee R, Ibanez P, Keane PA, Michaelides M, Wong SC (2019) Subclinical macular changes and disease laterality in pediatric Coats disease determined by quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography. Retina 39:2392–2398. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000002322
Yonekawa Y, Todorich B, Trese MT (2016) Optical coherence tomography angiography findings in Coats’ disease. Ophthalmology 123:1964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.05.004
Carnevali A, Sacconi R, Corbelli E, Tomasso L, Querques L, Zerbini G, Scorcia V, Bandello F, Querques G (2017) Optical coherence tomography angiography analysis of retinal vascular plexuses and choriocapillaris in patients with type 1 diabetes without diabetic retinopathy. Acta Diabetol 54:695–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-017-0996-8
Mameli C, Invernizzi A, Bolchini A, Bedogni G, Giani E, Macedoni M, Zuccotti G, Preziosa C, Pellegrini M (2019) Analysis of retinal perfusion in children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes using optical coherence tomography angiography. J Diabetes Res 2019:5410672. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5410672
Acknowledgements
LV Heidelberg Engineering Research and Equipment Grant (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All named authors have contributed to this paper in accordance with the ICMJE guidelines.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Duke University Health System Institutional Review Board and adhered to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Consent to publish
Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.
Conflict of interest
Author LV has received a research and equipment grant from Heidelberg Engineering (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). AP, NG, SS, and MK have no conflicts of interest and as such certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements) or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ponugoti, A., Ngo, H., Stinnett, S. et al. Repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative OCT angiography measurements from table-top and portable Flex Spectralis devices. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 262, 1785–1793 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06351-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06351-3