Log in

Changes in astigmatism in children with congenital nystagmus

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Astigmatism is commonly reported in children with and without nystagmus. In children less than 4 years of age the astigmatism changes from against the rule (ATR) to with the rule (WTR) astigmatism in children without nystagmus. However, little is known about children with congenital nystagmus. We compared astigmatism in children with congenital nystagmus below 4 years and above 4 years of age.

Material and methods

Three hundred and fifty-six eyes in 178 children who satisfied the study criteria were included. The children were divided into those below 4 years of age (n of eyes = 192) and those above (n of eyes = 164). Cycloplegic refraction (with manual retinoscopy) carried out at presentation and at the last follow-up were recorded and compared. Cycloplegia was achieved using cyclopentolate eye drops. Outcome of eyes with no astigmatism at initial presentation was compared with the final refraction in both the age groups. The visual acuity at the first presentation was compared with the visual acuity at the last presentation.

Results

Average follow-up duration was 3.36±1.59 years. On presentation, 176 (49.44%) eyes did not have any astigmatism. We found that 26 (25.2%) out of the 103 children below 4 years of age who did not have any astigmatism on presentation developed WTR astigmatism after a mean follow-up of 3.5±1.5 years. (p= 0.042). In children ≥4 years of age only 7 (9.6%) children out of 73 developed WTR after a mean follow-up of 3.4±1.4 years. The visual acuity change was not found to be significant in the two groups. The majority (90.3%) improved or had same visual acuity in group A and 88.9% improved or had the same visual acuity in group B at the last follow-up (p= 0.77).

Discussion

Our incidence of WTR astigmatism in children with congenital nystagmus is similar to those previously reported series. Our data suggest that there is a significant chance that children under 4 years with congenital nystagmus may develop WTR astigmatism compared with children above 4 years of age.

Conclusion

With the rule (WTR) astigmatism is common in children with nystagmus. Children under 4 years of age presenting with no astigmatism may acquire WTR astigmatism as they grow. The amount of astigmatism increases with age in children with nystagmus. Visual acuity, however, remains stable as the age advances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abadi RV, Bjerre A (2002) Motor and sensory characteristics of infantile nystagmus. Br J Ophthalmol 86:1152–1160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abrahamsson M, Fabian G, Sjostrand J (1988). Changes in astigmatism between the ages of 1 and 4 years: a longitudinal study. Br J Ophthalmol 72:145–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brodsky MC, Baker RS, Hamed LM (1996) Paediatric neuroophthalmology, 1st edn. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 302–349

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dandona R, Dandona L, Srinivas M, Sahare P, Narsaiah S, Munoz SR, Pokharel GP, Ellwein LB (2002) Refractive error in children in a rural population in India. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:615–622

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dickinson CM, Abadi RV (1984) Corneal topography of humans with congenital nystagmus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 4:3–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dobson V, Fultron AB, Sebris L (1984) Cycloplegic refractions of infants and young children: the axis of astigmatism. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:83–87

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gwiazda J, Scheiman M, Mohindra I, Held R (1984) Astigmatism in children: changes in axis and amount from birth to six years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:88–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hertle RW (2000) Examination and refractive management of patients with nystagmus. Surv Ophthalmol 455:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hertle RW, Zhu X (1999) Oculographic and clinical characterisation of thirty-seven children with anomalous head postures, nystagmus and strabismus: the basis of clinical algorithm. JAAPOS 3:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  10. Montes-Mico R (2000) Astigmatism in infancy and childhood. J Paediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 37:349–353

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Murthy GVS, Gupta SV, Ellwein LB, Munoz SR, Pokharel GP, Sanga L, Bachani D (2002) Refractive error in children in an urban population in New Delhi. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:623–631

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohmi G, Reinecke RD (1993) Astigmatism of nystagmus subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34 [Suppl]:1125

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sampath V, Bedell HE (2002) Distribution of refractive errors in albinos and persons with idiopathic congenital nystagmus. Optom Vis Sci 79:292–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tong L, Saw SM, Chia KS, Koh D, Tan D (2004) Incidence and progression of astigmatism in Singaporean children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3914–3918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wildsoet CF, Oswald PJ, Clark S (2000) Albinism: its implications for refractive development. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:1–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge Dr. Stephen Kraft, Ontario, Canada for his valuable comments and timely help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Jethani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jethani, J., Prakash, K., Vijayalakshmi, P. et al. Changes in astigmatism in children with congenital nystagmus. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmo 244, 938–943 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0157-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-005-0157-6

Keywords

Navigation