Abstract
Purpose
Synechiae formation in the middle meatus is the most common complication of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Our objectives were to determine the incidence of synechiae occurring in a cohort of patients that have undergone FESS and identify characteristics associated with the development of synechiae postoperatively.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was conducted of CRS patients, with or without nasal polyposis, that had undergone bilateral FESS in the past. All patients had received non-absorbable spacers intraoperatively that were left in situ for 6 days. Demographic and preoperative variables were analyzed to identify synechiae risk factors. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to estimate the probability of develo** synechiae, given demographic and preoperative variables.
Results
Two hundred cases of bilateral FESS were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-eight (19.0%, 95% CI 13.6–24.4%) patients developed synechiae. Individuals receiving primary FESS and nasal septal reconstruction (NSR) were strongly associated with the development of synechiae (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5–8.5; OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.3–6.9). A multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for NSR, recurrent FESS, concha bullosa, requirement of anterior and posterior ethmoidectomy, Lund-Mackay CT score and gender, identified the likelihood of develo** synechiae with a sensitivity of 68%, specificity of 73%, positive predictive value of 38% and likelihood ratio of 2.5.
Conclusion
Patients undergoing primary FESS and NSR are at greatest odds of develo** postoperative synechiae. Methods of assessing risk factors and preventing synechiae formation in this population should be evaluated in future prospective investigations.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00405-018-4936-1/MediaObjects/405_2018_4936_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00405-018-4936-1/MediaObjects/405_2018_4936_Fig2_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bednarski KA, Kuhn FA (2009) Stents and drug-eluting stents. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 42:857–866
Miller RS, Steward DL, Tami TA et al (2003) The clinical effects of hyaluronic acid ester nasal dressing (Merogel) on intranasal wound healing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128:862–869
Saafan ME, Ragab SM, Albirmawy OA, Elsherif HS (2013) Powered versus conventional endoscopic sinus surgery instruments in management of sinonasal polyposis. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 270:149–155
Catalano PJ, Roffman EJ. Evaluation of middle meatal stenting after minimally invasive sinus techniques (MIST). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003; 128:875–881
Friedman M, Landsberg R, Tanyeri H (2000) Middle turbinate medialization and preservation in endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:76–80
Jorissen M (2004) Postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery. Rhinology 42:114–120
Hobson CE, Choby GW, Wang EW, Morton SC, Lee S (2015) Systematic review and metaanalysis of middle meatal packing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allerg 29:135–140
Lee JM, Grewal A (2012) Middle meatal spacers for the prevention of synechiae following endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Forum Allerg Rhinol 2:477–486
Wang TC, Tai CJ, Tsou YA, Tsai LT, Li YF, Tsai MH (2015) Absorbable and nonabsorbable packing after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 272:1825–1831
Stallman JS, Lobo JN, Som PM (2004) The incidence of concha bullosa and its relationship to nasal septal deviation and paranasal sinus disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1613–1618
Lee JY, Lee SW (2007) Preventing lateral synechia formation after endoscopic sinus surgery with a silastic sheet. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:776–779
Brenner H, Gefeller O (1997) Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Stat Med 16:981–991
Akobeng AK (2007) Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice. Acta Paediatr 96:487–491
Roldan Nofuentes JA, Luna del Castillo JD (2005) Comparing the likelihood ratios of two binary diagnostic tests in the presence of partial verification. Biom J Biom Zeitschrift 47:442–457
Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2004) Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ 329:168–169
Mantovani M, Rinaldi V, Torretta S et al (2014) The dragonfly splint: a new disposable device designed to prevent both medial and lateral turbinate synechiae after sinonasal surgery. J Craniofacial Surg 25:547–550
Xu JJ, Busato GM, McKnight C, Lee JM (2016) Absorbable steroid-impregnated spacer after endoscopic sinus surgery to reduce synechiae formation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 125:195–198
Choby GW, Hobson CE, Lee S, Wang EW (2014) Clinical effects of middle turbinate resection after endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allerg 28:502–507
Henriquez OA, Schlosser RJ, Mace JC, Smith TL, Soler ZM (2013) Impact of synechiae after endoscopic sinus surgery on long-term outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 123:2615–2619
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict(s) of interest
We have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
This was a retrospective chart review and thus, informed consent was not required by our human ethics board.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manji, J., Habib, AR.R., Amanian, A.A. et al. Potential risk factors associated with the development of synechiae following functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275, 1175–1181 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4936-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4936-1