Log in

Cochlear implantation in patients with definite Meniere’s disease

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The exact pathomechanism of deafening in Meniere’s disease (MD) is still unknown; intoxication of hair cells and neural damage from endolymphatic hydrops is discussed. In the literature, there are only a few reports on hearing outcome of MD patients after treatment with cochlear implantation (CI) whereby especially the comparison of MD vs. non-MD patients with CI differs. In this retrospective study, results in speech understanding [Freiburger Einsilber (FES65) and Hochmair–Schulz–Moser test in quiet (HSM) and in noise (HSM + 10 dB)] of 27 implanted MD patients were collected and compared to a matched standard CI cohort. Alternative diagnoses were excluded as far as possible by re-analyzing neuroradiologic imaging. After first fitting, MD patients showed significantly better results in FES and HSM testing compared to controls. At 1-year refitting, this effect could not be seen anymore. To conclude, cochlear implantation is a safe and effective treatment for deafness in MD patients. Results in speech understanding are at least equal compared to general CI recipients. To the best of our knowledge, this retrospective study examined the largest collective of CI users deafened by MD so far.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Foundation, Inc. (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Menière’s disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113:181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. McRackan TD, Gifford RH, Kahue CN, Dwyer R, Labadie RF, Wanna GB, Haynes DS, Bennett ML (2014) Cochlear implantation in Menière’s disease patients. Otol Neurotol 35:421–425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Samy RN, Houston L, Scott M, Choo DI, Meinzen-Derr J (2014) Cochlear implantation in patients with Meniere’s disease. Cochlear Implants Int. doi:10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lustig LR, Yeagle J, Niparko JK, Minor LB (2003) Cochlear implantation in patients with bilateral Ménière’s syndrome. Otol Neurotol 24:397–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen MR, Gantz BJ, Dunn C (2013) Outcomes following cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided deafness, including those with recalcitrant Ménière’s disease. Otol Neurotol. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000102

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doobe G, Ernst A, Ramalingam R, Mittmann P, Todt I (2015) Simultaneous labyrinthectomy and cochlear implantation for patients with single-sided Ménière’s disease and profound sensorineural hearing loss. Biomed Res Int 2015:457318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Shojaku H, Watanabe Y, Mizukoshi K, Kitahara M, Yazawa Y, Watanabe I, Ohkubo J (1995) Epidemiological study of severe cases of Meniére’s disease in Japan. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 520:415–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stahle J (1976) Advanced Meniere’s disease. A study of 356 severely disabled patients. Acta Otolaryngol 81:113–119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T (2011) Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol 32:39–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Elmali M, Polat AV, Kucuk H, Atmaca S, Aksoy A (2013) Semicircular canal dehiscence: frequency and distribution on temporal bone CT and its relationship with the clinical outcomes. Eur J Radiol 82:606–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stimmer H, Hamann KF, Zeiter S, Naumann A, Rummeny EJ (2012) Semicircular canal dehiscence in HR multislice computed tomography: distribution, frequency, and clinical relevance. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269:475–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakashima T, Naganawa S, Sugiura M, Teranishi M, Sone M, Hayashi H, Nakata S, Katayama N, Ishida IM (2007) Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope 117:415–420

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Naganawa S, Yamazaki M, Kawai H, Bokura K, Sone M, Nakashima T (2012) Imaging of Meniere’s disease after intravenous administration of single-dose gadodiamide: utility of subtraction images with different inversion times. Magn Reson Med Sci 11(3):213–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wu Q, Dai C, Zhao M, Sha Y (2016) The correlation between symptoms of definite Meniere’s disease and endolymphatic hydrops visualized by magnetic resonance imaging. Laryngoscope 126:974–979

  15. Lehnhardt E, Laszig R (2009) Praxis der Audiometrie. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Gerenton G, Giraudet F, Djennaoui I, Pavier Y, Gilain L, Mom T, Avan P (2015) Abnormal fast fluctuations of electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions in Menière’s disease. Hear Res 327:199–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bixenstine PJ, Maniglia MP, Vasanji A, Alagramam KN, Megerian CA (2008) Spiral ganglion degeneration patterns in endolymphatic hydrops. Laryngoscope 118(7):1217–1223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Kristian Prenzler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

N. Prenzler and E. Bültmann contributed equally to this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prenzler, N.K., Bültmann, E., Giourgas, A. et al. Cochlear implantation in patients with definite Meniere’s disease. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 751–756 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4356-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4356-z

Keywords

Navigation