Log in

Cotton pledget packing versus topical spray for nasal preparation: merits and demerits are answered by a strict randomized controlled trial

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Mishra P, Kaushik M, Dehadaray A, Qadri H, Raichurkar A, Seth T (2012) Preparation of nose for nasal endoscopy: cotton pledget packing versus topical spray. A prospective randomized blinded study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

  2. Hu CT (2010) Gauze pledgetting versus endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray for nasal anesthesia before transnasal EGD: a prospective, randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc 71(1):11–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author states that there is no financial interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chi-Tan Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, CT. Cotton pledget packing versus topical spray for nasal preparation: merits and demerits are answered by a strict randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 270, 1763–1764 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2312-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-012-2312-0

Navigation