Log in

Reproducibility of fetal ductus venosus blood flow velocity waveforms during first stage of labor

  • Materno-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract:

Objectives

Fetal ductus venosus (DV) blood flow velocity waveforms are significantly altered during contractions in first stage of labor. We have evaluated the reproducibility of these waveforms during and between contractions.

Methods

90 women between 37th and 41st week of gestation were included in the study. The measurements of the DV were obtained by three different investigators during and between contractions. The pulsatility index for veins (PIV), peak velocity index for veins (PVIV), and fetal heart rate (FHR) were calculated offline. Furthermore, differences in PVIV (PVIVdiff) and PIV (PIVdiff) and a mean of FHR (FHRmean) were calculated. Statistical analysis was used to verify differences in the PIV, PVIV and FHR during and between contractions of each subgroup as well as for the PVIVdiff, PIVdiff and FHRmean between the subgroups.

Results

Investigator 1 examined 49 patients (group 1); investigator 2, 17 patients (group 2) and investigator 3, 24 patients (group 3), respectively. In all subgroups, there was a significant difference for the PVIV and PIV during and between contractions, but not for FHR. There was a correlation between gestational age and PVIVdiff, PIVdiff and FHRmean as well as for maternal age and PVIVdiff and PIVdiff. PVIVdiff and PIVdiff showed significant differences in group 1 compared to groups 2 and 3 (p < 0.001), but not between groups 2 and 3.

Conclusions

Significant differences in the measurements in the three subgroups have been revealed, which may be due to different timing of measurement during the contraction. For future studies further standardization of the measurement protocol should be established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thacker SB, Stroup DF (2000) Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD000063

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal SK, Doucette F, Gratton R, Richardson B, Gagnon R (2003) Intrapartum computerized fetal heart rate parameters and metabolic acidosis at birth. Obstet Gynecol 102:731–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. East CE, Leader LR, Sheehan P, Henshall NE, Colditz PB (2010) Intrapartum fetal scalp lactate sampling for fetal assessment in the presence of a non-reassuring fetal heart rate trace. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 17:CD006174

    Google Scholar 

  4. Klauser CK, Christensen EE, Chauhan SP, Bufkin L, Magann EF, Bofill JA, Morrison JC (2005) Use of fetal pulse oximetry among high-risk women in labor: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 192:1810–1817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dervaitis KL, Poole M, Schmidt G, Penava D, Natale R, Gagnon R (2004) ST segment analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram plus electronic fetal heart rate monitoring in labor and its relationship to umbilical cord arterial blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:879–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marsál K (2009) Obstetric management of intrauterine growth restriction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23:857–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huhta JC, Paul JJ (2010) Doppler in fetal heart failure. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53:915–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baschat AA, Güclü S, Kush ML, Gembruch U, Weiner CP, Harman CR (2004) Venous Doppler in the prediction of acid–base status of growth-restricted fetuses with elevated placental blood flow resistance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:277–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiserud T (2001) The ductus venosus. Semin Perinatol 25:11–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Krapp M, Denzel S, Katalinic A, Berg C, Germer U, Gembruch U (2002) A preliminary study of fetal ductus venosus blood flow during the first stage of labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet 267:19–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krapp M, Denzel S, Katalinic A, Berg C, Smrcek J, Geipel A, Gembruch U (2002) Normal values of fetal ductus venosus blood flow waveforms during the first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19:556–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Szunyogh N, Zubor P, Dokus K, Galo S, Visnovsky J, Danko J (2006) Uterine activity and ductus venosus flow velocity patterns during the first stage of labor. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95:18–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hecher K, Campbell S, Snijders R, Nicolaides K (1994) Reference ranges for fetal venous and atrioventricular blood flow parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:381–390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Szunyogh N, Galo S, Zubor P, Visnovsky J (2006) Atypical ductus venosus blood flow pattern during a prolonged fetal heart rate deceleration in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was generously supported by a Grant of the German Research Foundation. We would like to thank S.D. and M.P. for their participation in data acquisition.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Krapp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krapp, M., Kühn, A., Baumann, K. et al. Reproducibility of fetal ductus venosus blood flow velocity waveforms during first stage of labor. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285, 87–92 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1913-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1913-y

Keywords

Navigation