Log in

Computational fluid dynamics assessment of congenital tracheal stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The severity of congenital tracheal stenosis (CTS) is commonly evaluated based on the degree of stenosis. However, it does not always reflect the clinical respiratory status. We applied computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to the assessment of CTS. The aim of this study was to evaluate its validity.

Methods

CFD models were constructed on 15 patients (12 preoperative models and 15 postoperative models) with CTS before and after surgery, using the computed tomographic data. Energy flux, needed to drive airflow, measured by CFD and the minimum cross-sectional area of the trachea (MCAT) were quantified and evaluated retrospectively.

Results

The energy flux correlated positively with the clinical respiratory status before and after surgery (rs = 0.611, p = 0.035 and rs = 0.591, p = 0.020, respectively). Although MCAT correlated negatively with the clinical respiratory status before surgery (rs = -0.578, p = 0.044), there was not significant correlation between the two after surgery (p = 0.572).

Conclusions

The energy flux measured by CFD assessment reflects the respiratory status in CTS before and after surgery. CFD can be an additional objective and quantitative evaluation tool for CTS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Hofferberth SC, Watters K, Rahbar R, Fynn-Thompson F (2015) Management of congenital tracheal stenosis. Pediatrics 136:e660–e669. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-3931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Antón-Pacheco JL, Cano I, Comas J, Galletti L, Polo L, García A, López M, Cabezalí D (2006) Management of congenital tracheal stenosis in infancy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 29:991–996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng W, Manson DE, Forte V, Ein SH, MacLusky I, Papsin BC, Hechter S, Kim PC (2006) The role of conservative management in congenital tracheal stenosis: an evidence-based long-term follow-up study. J Pediatr Surg 41:1203–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.03.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yamoto M, Fukumoto K, Sekioka A, Iwazaki T, Sano K, Takahashi T, Nakaya K, Nomura A, Yamada Y, Urushihara N (2019) Non-operative management of congenital tracheal stenosis: criteria by computed tomography. Pediatr Surg Int 35:1123–1130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-019-04532-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mimouni-Benabu O, Meister L, Giordano J, Fayoux P, Loundon N, Triglia JM, Nicollas R (2012) A preliminary study of computer assisted evaluation of congenital tracheal stenosis: a new tool for surgical decision-making. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76:1552–1557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.07.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Qi S, Li Z, Yue Y, van Triest HJ, Kang Y (2014) Computational fluid dynamics simulation of airflow in the trachea and main bronchi for the subjects with left pulmonary artery sling. Biomed Eng Online 13:85. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Takeishi N, Miki T, Otani T, Ii S, Morita K, Wada S (2019) Fluid dynamic assessment of tracheal flow in infants with congenital tracheal stenosis before and after surgery. Med Biol Eng Comput 57:837–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-018-1928-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bates AJ, Comerford A, Cetto R, Schroter RC, Tolley NS, Doorly DJ (2016) Power loss mechanisms in pathological tracheas. J Biomech 49:2187–2192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. **ao Q, Cetto R, Doorly DJ, Bates AJ, Rose JN, McIntyre C, Comerford A, Madani G, Tolley NS, Schroter R (2020) Assessing changes in airflow and energy loss in a progressive tracheal compression before and after surgical correction. Ann Biomed Eng 48:822–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02410-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morita K, Maeda K, Yabe K, Oshima Y (2017) Management of congenital tracheal stenosis in the neonatal period. Pediatr Surg Int 33:1059–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-017-4137-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Motoyama EK, Finder JD (2016) Respiratory physiology. In: Davis PJ, Cladis FP (eds) Smith’s anesthesia for infants and children, 9th edn. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 23–72

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma A, Ford S, Calvert J (2008) Adaptation for life: a review of neonatal physiology. Anaesth Intensive Care 9:93–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2008.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cantrell JR, Guild HG (1964) Congenital stenosis of the trachea. Am J Surg 108:297–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(64)90023-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brouns M, Jayaraju ST, Lacor C, De Mey J, Noppen M, Vincken W, Verbanck S (2007) Tracheal stenosis: a flow dynamics study. J Appl Physiol 102:1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01063.2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bates AJ, Cetto R, Doorly DJ, Schroter RC, Tolley NS, Comerford A (2016) The effects of curvature and constriction on airflow and energy loss in pathological tracheas. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 234:69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2016.09.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Partial financial support was received from JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP19H01175, and JP20H04504. The authors thank Ms. Shiori Kageyama and Ms. Kao Taniguchi for their assistance in the preparation of this work.

Funding

Partial financial support was received from JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP19H01175, and JP20H04504.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing: KM, NT; supervision: SW, TH.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keiichi Morita.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study has been approved by the Institutional ethics committee (approval number: R30-12) and performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate and consent to publish

This study was open to the public and guaranteed a refusal to cooperate; the data were anonymous, and the need for a separate informed consent was waived.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morita, K., Takeishi, N., Wada, S. et al. Computational fluid dynamics assessment of congenital tracheal stenosis. Pediatr Surg Int 38, 1769–1776 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05228-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-022-05228-6

Keywords

Navigation