Log in

Extraction of esophageal foreign bodies in children: rigid versus flexible endoscopy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Foreign body (FB) ingestion is a common and potentially serious problem in children. Both rigid (RE) and flexible (FE) endoscopic techniques are used for removal of esophageal FBs; however, there is no consensus amongst pediatric surgeons regarding the best method. This study reviewed our experience managing esophageal FBs using both techniques.

Methods

A 12-year retrospective review of children admitted with an esophageal FB between 1999 and 2012 was undertaken. Clinical data, management techniques, and complications were abstracted. Differences between these two groups were compared with standard statistical methods.

Results

657 children were treated for esophageal FB ingestion, of which 366 (56 %) were treated with FE. The most frequently ingested item was a coin (84 %), and FBs were most commonly lodged in the upper third of the esophagus (78 %). There was a slightly younger population in the FE group (4.0 vs. 3.3 years, p < 0.01), but otherwise no significant differences were found between the groups. The FB was successfully removed with the initially chosen technique in 97 % of patients.

Conclusions

Esophageal FBs may be successfully removed with either RE or FE. Since treatment failures were managed with conversion to the other technique, both procedures should be included in the training curriculum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Goldstein JL, Johanson JF, Mallery JS, Raddawi HM, Vargo JJ 2nd, Waring JP, Fanelli RD, Wheeler-Harbough J (2002) Guideline for the management of ingested foreign bodies. Gastrointest Endosc 55(7):802–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Doolin EJ (1993) Esophageal stricture: an uncommon complication of foreign bodies. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 102(11):863–866

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nahman BJ, Mueller CF (1984) Asymptomatic esophageal perforation by a coin in a child. Ann Emerg Med 13(8):627–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Russell RT, Cohen M, Billmire DF (2013) Tracheoesophageal fistula following button battery ingestion: successful non-operative management. J Pediatr Surg 48(2):441–444. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.11.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Litovitz T, Whitaker N, Clark L, White NC, Marsolek M (2010) Emerging battery-ingestion hazard: clinical implications. Pediatrics 125(6):1168–1177. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-3037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Byard RW, Moore L, Bourne AJ (1990) Sudden and unexpected death—a late effect of occult intraesophageal foreign body. Pediatr Pathol Affil Int Paediatr Pathol Assoc 10(5):837–841

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gmeiner D, von Rahden BH, Meco C, Hutter J, Oberascher G, Stein HJ (2007) Flexible versus rigid endoscopy for treatment of foreign body impaction in the esophagus. Surg Endosc 21(11):2026–2029. doi:10.1007/s00464-007-9252-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weissberg D, Refaely Y (2007) Foreign bodies in the esophagus. Ann Thorac Surg 84(6):1854–1857. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.07.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Popel J, El-Hakim H, El-Matary W (2011) Esophageal foreign body extraction in children: flexible versus rigid endoscopy. Surg Endosc 25(3):919–922. doi:10.1007/s00464-010-1299-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng W, Tam PK (1999) Foreign-body ingestion in children: experience with 1,265 cases. J Pediatr Surg 34(10):1472–1476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neill JA Jr (1998) Balloon extraction of esophageal foreign bodies in children. J Pediatr Surg 33(9):1458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Little DC, Shah SR, St Peter SD, Calkins CM, Morrow SE, Murphy JP, Sharp RJ, Andrews WS, Holcomb GW 3rd, Ostlie DJ, Snyder CL (2006) Esophageal foreign bodies in the pediatric population: our first 500 cases. J Pediatr Surg 41(5):914–918. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.01.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schunk JE, Harrison AM, Corneli HM, Nixon GW (1994) Fluoroscopic foley catheter removal of esophageal foreign bodies in children: experience with 415 episodes. Pediatrics 94(5):709–714

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonadio WA, Jona JZ, Glicklich M, Cohen R (1988) Esophageal bougienage technique for coin ingestion in children. J Pediatr Surg 23(10):917–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Calkins CM, Christians KK, Sell LL (1999) Cost analysis in the management of esophageal coins: endoscopy versus bougienage. J Pediatr Surg 34(3):412–414

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahshan AH, Kevin Donovan G (2007) Bougienage versus endoscopy for esophageal coin removal in children. J Clin Gastroenterol 41(5):454–456. doi:10.1097/01.mcg.0000225622.09718.5f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Waltzman ML, Baskin M, Wypij D, Mooney D, Jones D, Fleisher G (2005) A randomized clinical trial of the management of esophageal coins in children. Pediatrics 116(3):614–619. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. US Department of Commerce: United States Census Bureau, State and County QuickFacts (2013). http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/01000.html. Accessed 28 Mar 2013

  19. Waltzman ML, Baskin M, Wypij D, Mooney D, Jones D, Fleisher G (2005) A randomized clinical trial of the management of esophageal coins in children. Pediatrics 116(3):614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Conners GP, Cobaugh DJ, Feinberg R, Lucanie R, Caraccio T, Stork CM (1999) Home observation for asymptomatic coin ingestion: acceptance and outcomes. The New York State Poison Control Center Coin Ingestion Study Group. Acad Emerg Med 6(3):213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Crysdale WS, Sendi KS, Yoo J (1991) Esophageal foreign bodies in children. 15-year review of 484 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100(4 Pt 1):320–324

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yalcin S, Karnak I, Ciftci AO, Senocak ME, Tanyel FC, Buyukpamukcu N (2007) Foreign body ingestion in children: an analysis of pediatric surgical practice. Pediatr Surg Int 23(8):755–761. doi:10.1007/s00383-007-1958-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hurtado CW, Furuta GT, Kramer RE (2011) Etiology of esophageal food impactions in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 52(1):43–46. doi:10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181e67072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams P, Jameson S, Bishop P, Nowicki M (2013) Esophageal foreign bodies and eosinophilic esophagitis-the need for esophageal mucosal biopsy: a 12-year survey across pediatric subspecialties. Surg Endosc (Epub ahead of print)

  25. Dellon ES, Gibbs WB, Fritchie KJ, Rubinas TC, Wilson LA, Woosley JT, Shaheen NJ (2009) Clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings distinguish eosinophilic esophagitis from gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc 7(12):1305–1313. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2009.08.030 (quiz 1261)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hawkins DB (1990) Removal of blunt foreign bodies from the esophagus. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99(12):935

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Russell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russell, R., Lucas, A., Johnson, J. et al. Extraction of esophageal foreign bodies in children: rigid versus flexible endoscopy. Pediatr Surg Int 30, 417–422 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3481-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3481-2

Keywords

Navigation