Log in

Current status and challenges of neurosurgical procedures for patients with myelomeningocele in real-world Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Little is known about the real-world status of neurosurgical treatment of myelomeningocele patients.

Objective

To investigate the real-world status of neurosurgical treatment of myelomeningocele patients, medical claims data provided by the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) were analyzed.

Methods

The health claims data of 556 patients with myelomeningoceles from January 2005 to March 2020 were examined. The number of neurosurgical procedures, including myelomeningocele repair, tethered cord release, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt, CSF drainage, and endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV), was determined.

Results

A total of 313 neurosurgical procedures were performed for 135 patients in 74 institutions during the study period. The shunt survival rate was most affected by shunts that were revised when the patient was less than 1 year old, which had a significantly lower survival rate than all of the initial shunts performed when the patient was less than on1 year old; the 1-year shunt survival rate was 35 vs 64% (P = 0.0102). The survival rate was significantly lower in patients younger than 1 year who had CSF drainage before shunting compared to those younger than 1 year who did not have CSF drainage before shunting; the 1-year shunt survival rate was 27 vs 59% (P = 0.0196), and 81% of patients remained free of tethered cord release 10 years later.

Conclusions

In this study, a revised shunt of less than 1 year of age and CSF drainage before shunting were the factors that lowered the shunt survival rate in the real world for CSF shunts for hydrocephalus associated with myelomeningocele.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

JMDC:

Japan Medical Data Center

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

ETV:

Endoscopic third ventriculostomy

ICD-10:

International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision

TCR:

Tethered cord release

References

  1. Talamonti G, D’Aliberti G, Collice M (2007) Myelomeningocele: long-term neurosurgical treatment and follow-up in 202 patients. J Neurosurg 107:368–386. https://doi.org/10.3171/PED-07/11/368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kellogg R, Lee P, Deibert CP, Tempel Z, Zwagerman NT, Bonfield CM, Johnson S, Greene S (2018) Twenty years’ experience with myelomeningocele management at a single institution: lessons learned. J Neurosurg Pediatr 22:439–443. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.5.PEDS17584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Spoor JKH, Gadjradj PS, Eggink AJ, DeKoninck PLJ, Lutters B, Scheepe JR, van Meeteren J, de Laat PCJ, van Veelen ML, de Jong THR (2019) Contemporary management and outcome of myelomeningocele: the Rotterdam experience. Neurosurg Focus 47:E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.7.FOCUS19447

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. White MD, McDowell MM, Agarwal N, Greene S (2021) Shunt infection and malfunction in patients with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.9.PEDS20313

  5. Adzick NS, Thom EA, Spong CY, Brock JW 3rd, Burrows PK, Johnson MP, Howell LJ, Farrell JA, Dabrowiak ME, Sutton LN, Gupta N, Tulipan NB, D’Alton ME, Farmer DL, Investigators M (2011) A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med 364:993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1014379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy DJ, Sheinberg DL, Luther E, McCrea HJ (2019) Myelomeningocele-associated hydrocephalus: nationwide analysis and systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 47:E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.7.FOCUS19469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim I, Hopson B, Aban I, Rizk EB, Dias MS, Bowman R, Ackerman LL, Partington MD, Castillo H, Castillo J, Peterson PR, Blount JP, Rocque BG (2018) Treated hydrocephalus in individuals with myelomeningocele in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. J Neurosurg Pediatr 22:646–651. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.5.PEDS18161

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim I, Hopson B, Aban I, Rizk EB, Dias MS, Bowman R, Ackerman LL, Partington MD, Castillo H, Castillo J, Peterson PR, Blount JP, Rocque BG (2018) Decompression for Chiari malformation type II in individuals with myelomeningocele in the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. J Neurosurg Pediatr 22:652–658. https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.5.PEDS18160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Dias MS, Wang M, Rizk EB, Bowman R, Partington MD, Blount JP, Rocque BG, Hopson B, Ettinger D, Lee A, Walker WO, National Spina Bifida Patient Registry G (2021) Tethered spinal cord among individuals with myelomeningocele: an analysis of the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.12.PEDS20868

  10. Kshettry VR, Kelly ML, Rosenbaum BP, Seicean A, Hwang L, Weil RJ (2014) Myelomeningocele: surgical trends and predictors of outcome in the United States, 1988–2010. J Neurosurg Pediatr 13:666–678. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.3.PEDS13597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borgstedt-Bakke JH, Wichmann TO, Gudmundsdottir G, Rasmussen MM (2020) The incidence and effect of tethered cord release for tethered cord syndrome in patients with myelomeningocele: a population-based study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.4.PEDS19722

  12. Kimura S, Sato T, Ikeda S, Noda M, Nakayama T (2010) Development of a database of health insurance claims: standardization of disease classifications and anonymous record linkage. J Epidemiol 20:413–419. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.je20090066

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nonaka M, Isozaki H, Komori Y, Kamei T, Takeda J, Yabe I, Zaitsu M, Nakashima K, Asai A (2022) Number of surgeries performed during the lifetime of patients with myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg Pediatr in press

  14. Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C, La Marca F (1996) Shunt complications in the first postoperative year in children with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst 12:748–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00261592

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dupepe EB, Hopson B, Johnston JM, Rozzelle CJ, Jerry Oakes W, Blount JP, Rocque BG (2016) Rate of shunt revision as a function of age in patients with shunted hydrocephalus due to myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus 41:E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.8.FOCUS16257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Riva-Cambrin J, Kestle JR, Holubkov R, Butler J, Kulkarni AV, Drake J, Whitehead WE, Wellons JC, 3rd, Shannon CN, Tamber MS, Limbrick DD, Jr., Rozzelle C, Browd SR, Simon TD, Hydrocephalus Clinical Research N (2016) Risk factors for shunt malfunction in pediatric hydrocephalus: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 17:382–390. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.6.PEDS14670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuli S, Drake J, Lamberti-Pasculli M (2003) Long-term outcome of hydrocephalus management in myelomeningoceles. Childs Nerv Syst 19:286–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-003-0759-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller PD, Pollack IF, Pang D, Albright AL (1996) Comparison of simultaneous versus delayed ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion in children undergoing myelomeningocele repair. J Child Neurol 11:370–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/088307389601100504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Radmanesh F, Nejat F, El Khashab M, Ghodsi SM, Ardebili HE (2009) Shunt complications in children with myelomeningocele: effect of timing of shunt placement. Clinical article J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:516–520. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.PEDS08476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. George TM, Fagan LH (2005) Adult tethered cord syndrome in patients with postrepair myelomeningocele: an evidence-based outcome study. J Neurosurg 102:150–156. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2005.102.2.0150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hudgins RJ, Gilreath CL (2004) Tethered spinal cord following repair of myelomeningocele. Neurosurg Focus 16:E7. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2004.16.2.8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehta VA, Bettegowda C, Ahmadi SA, Berenberg P, Thomale UW, Haberl EJ, Jallo GI, Ahn ES (2010) Spinal cord tethering following myelomeningocele repair. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:498–505. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.8.PEDS09491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tamaki N, Shirataki K, Kojima N, Shouse Y, Matsumoto S (1988) Tethered cord syndrome of delayed onset following repair of myelomeningocele. J Neurosurg 69:393–398. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1988.69.3.0393

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Filippidis AS, Kalani MY, Theodore N, Rekate HL (2010) Spinal cord traction, vascular compromise, hypoxia, and metabolic derangements in the pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome. Neurosurg Focus 29:E9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.3.FOCUS1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Research Committee of CNS Degenerative Diseases, Research on Policy Planning and Evaluation for Rare and Intractable Diseases, Health, Labour, and Welfare Sciences Research Grants, The Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, Japan (20FC1049).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Masahiro Nonaka: conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, analysis and/or interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published, Yumiko Komori: analysis and/or interpretation of data, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published, Haruna Isozaki: analysis and/or interpretation of data, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published, Katsuya Ueno: analysis and/or interpretation of data, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published, Takamasa Kamei: analysis and/or interpretation of data, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published, Junichi Takeda: analysis and/or interpretation of data, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published. Yuichiro Nonaka: conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published, Ichiro Yabe: conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published. Masayoshi Zaitsu: conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published, Kenji Nakashima: conception and design of the study, acquisition of data, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published, Akio Asai: analysis and/or interpretation of data, revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content, approval of the version of the manuscript to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahiro Nonaka.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kansai Medical University (No. 2021015).

Consent to participate

Written patient consent was waived because data were deidentified.

Consent for publication

The participant has consented to the submission of the report to the journal.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nonaka, M., Komori, Y., Isozaki, H. et al. Current status and challenges of neurosurgical procedures for patients with myelomeningocele in real-world Japan. Childs Nerv Syst 39, 3137–3145 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05613-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-022-05613-5

Keywords

Navigation