1 Correction to: Applied Physics A (2019) 125:210 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-019-2505-0

In the original publication of this article the author noticed some important corrections.

$${\text{VELF}}= - \operatorname{Im} \left( {\frac{1}{{{\varepsilon ^*}}}} \right)=\frac{{2{n_{{\text{MV}}}} \cdot {k_{{\text{MV}}}}}}{{{{\left[ {n_{{{\text{MV}}}}^{2} - k_{{{\text{MV}}}}^{2}} \right]}^2}+{{\left[ {2{n_{{\text{MV}}}} \cdot {k_{{\text{MV}}}}} \right]}^2}}}~,$$
(6a)
$${\text{SELF}}= - \operatorname{Im} \left( {\frac{1}{{{\varepsilon ^*}+1}}} \right)=\frac{{2nk}}{{{{\left[ {n_{{{\text{MV}}}}^{2} - k_{{{\text{MV}}}}^{2}+1} \right]}^2}+{{\left[ {2{n_{{\text{MV}}}} \cdot {k_{{\text{MV}}}}} \right]}^2}}}~,$$
(6b)

where n and k must be changed to nMV and kMV

$${\text{VELF}}= - \operatorname{Im} \left( {\frac{1}{{{\varepsilon ^*}}}} \right)=\frac{{2{n_{{\text{MV}}}} \cdot {k_{{\text{MV}}}}}}{{{{\left[ {n_{{{\text{MV}}}}^{2} - k_{{{\text{MV}}}}^{2}} \right]}^2}+{{\left[ {2{n_{{\text{MV}}}} \cdot {k_{{\text{MV}}}}} \right]}^2}}}~,$$
(6a)
$${\text{SELF}}= - \operatorname{Im} \left( {\frac{1}{{{\varepsilon ^*}+1}}} \right)=\frac{{2{n_{{\text{MV}}}} \cdot {k_{{\text{MV}}}}}}{{{{\left[ {n_{{{\text{MV}}}}^{2} - k_{{{\text{MV}}}}^{2}+1} \right]}^2}+{{\left[ {2{n_{{\text{MV}}}} \cdot {k_{{\text{MV}}}}} \right]}^2}}}~.$$
(6b)
Fig. 7
figure 7

The variation of a refractive index, nMV and b extinction coefficient, kMV versus \(h\nu\) before and after annealing for MV-6B thin films

Fig. 8
figure 8

Graph showing the variation: a relation between (\(n_{\text{MV}}^2\) − 1)−1 vs (\(h\nu\))2, b relation between \(n_{\text{MV}}^2\) as a function of \({\lambda ^2}\) for MV-6B nanocrystalline thin film

We apologize for this errors.