Abstract
Purpose
Percutaneous access for endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is commonplace, with its attendant benefits. The combination of continued reduction in device profile and evolution of vascular closure device (VCD) design drives successful and safe percutaneous EVAR. A new such VCD is the MANTA Large-Bore Closure Device designed in two iterations for closure of arterial defects from 10 to 25F. We present a prospective audit of 131 large-bore femoral closures using an ‘all-comers’ approach to device selection.
Materials and methods
One hundred and thirty-one large-bore femoral arterial defects were analysed. Both 14F and 18F MANTA VCDs were deployed in this series as per instructions for use. Primary objectives were technical success, particularly successful deployment, and haemostasis achieved. Failures were denoted as failure to deploy; failure to achieve haemostasis was denoted as active bleeding, haematoma, or pseudoaneurysm formation requiring intervention. Later complications assessed were vessel occlusion/thrombosis or stenosis.
Results
Seventy-six patients (65 males and 11 females, age 75.2 ± 8.7 years) underwent a range of procedures including EVAR (n = 66), TEVAR (n = 2), and reinterventions (n = 8) requiring large-bore percutaneous femoral arterial access in 131 groins. Of these, the 14F MANTA VCD was used in 61 closures (defects ranging from 12 to 18F) and the 18F in 70 closures (defects ranging from 16 to 24F). Deployments achieved successful haemostasis in 120 (91.6%), and failures occurred in 11(8.4%) groins.
Conclusions
This study indicates that a post-close approach using the novel MANTA Large-Bore Closure Device can be undertaken successfully to close a range of large-bore femoral arterial defects at EVAR/TEVAR with an acceptable rate of complications.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00270-023-03437-7/MediaObjects/270_2023_3437_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00270-023-03437-7/MediaObjects/270_2023_3437_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00270-023-03437-7/MediaObjects/270_2023_3437_Fig3_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee WA, Brown MP, Nelson PR, Huber TS. Total percutaneous access for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (“Preclose” technique). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45:1095–101.
Gheorghe L, Brouwer J, Mathijssen H, Nijenhuis VJ, Rensing BJ, Swaans MJ, et al. Early outcomes after percutaneous closure of access site in transfemoral transcatheter valve implantation using the novel vascular closure device collagen plug-based MANTA. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:1265–71.
Minion DJ, Davenport DL. Access techniques for EVAR: percutaneous techniques and working with small arteries. Semin Vasc Surg. 2012;25:208–16.
Smith TA, Ramirez DE. Awake, percutaneous repair of a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ochsner J. 2013;13:248–51.
Lachat ML, Pecoraro F, Mayer D, Guillet C, Glenck M, Rancic Z, et al. Outpatient endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: experience in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2013;258:754–8 (Discussion 8–9).
Georgiadis GS, Antoniou GA, Papaioakim M, Georgakarakos E, Trellopoulos G, Papanas N, et al. A meta-analysis of outcome after percutaneous endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using different size sheaths or endograft delivery systems. J Endovasc Ther. 2011;18:445–59.
Harrison GJ, Thavarajan D, Brennan JA, Vallabhaneni SR, McWilliams RG, Fisher RK. Fascial closure following percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41:346–9.
Chaudhuri A. Femoral arterial haemostasis using an anchored collagen plug after percutaneous EVAR with an ultra-low profile device: prospective audit of an evolving “post-close” technique. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:241–6.
Chaudhuri A. Prospective audit of “post-close” haemostasis following large bore femoral arterial punctures: a second look at the double angio-seal technique. EJVES Short Rep. 2018;40:12–4.
Krajcer Z, Wood DA, Strickman N, Bernardo N, Metzger C, Aziz M, et al. Pivotal clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA vascular closure device during percutaneous EVAR and TEVAR procedures. J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27:414–20.
Gupta A, Fouad L, Basir M, Neupane S, Zaidan M, Koenig G, et al. Safety and effectiveness of MANTA vascular closure device after large-bore mechanical circulatory support: real-world experience. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020;21(7):875–8.
Tarantini G. MANTA dedicated large-bore vessel closure device. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e008203.
Van Mieghem NM, Latib A, van der Heyden J, van Gils L, Daemen J, Sorzano T, et al. Percutaneous plug-based arteriotomy closure device for large-bore access: a multicenter prospective study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:613–9.
Wood DA, Krajcer Z, Sathananthan J, Strickman N, Metzger C, Fearon W, et al. Pivotal clinical study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the MANTA percutaneous vascular closure device. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007258.
Megaly M, Sedhom R, Abdelmaseeh P, ElBebawy B, Goel SS, Karam J, et al. Complications of the MANTA closure device: insights from MAUDE database. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022;34:75–9.
Wong YH, De Backer O, Sondergaard L, Bieliauskas G. Percutaneous management of an embolised MANTA large bore arteriotomy closure device. EuroIntervention. 2019;15:74–5.
Hoffmann P, Al-Ani A, von Lueder T, Skoe OW, Tran TT, Opdahl A. Late pseudoaneurysm after access site closure with Manta in transfemoral aortic valve implantation. EJVES Short Rep. 2019;42:34–6.
Au SY, Fong KM, Ng WG, Lee KM, So SO, Leung KA. Real-time ultrasound-guided bedside closure of arteriotomy wound using MANTA closure device during venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation decannulation. Perfusion. 2020;36(2):118–21 (267659120932429).
Sarathy K, Khanna V, Baumbach A, Mullen M. Sonographic guidance of vascular closure with MANTA. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:2437–8.
Biancari F, Romppanen H, Savontaus M, Siljander A, Makikallio T, Piira OP, et al. MANTA versus ProGlide vascular closure devices in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2018;263:29–31.
Hoffmann P, Al-Ani A, von Lueder T, Hoffmann J, Majak P, Hagen O, et al. Access site complications after transfemoral aortic valve implantation—a comparison of Manta and ProGlide. CVIR Endovasc. 2018;1:20.
Moriyama N, Lindstrom L, Laine M. Propensity-matched comparison of vascular closure devices after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using MANTA versus ProGlide. EuroIntervention. 2019;14:e1558–65.
Chaudhuri A. A “post-close” technique for femoral hemostasis after percutaneous EVAR using an ultra-low-profile endoprosthesis system. EJVES Short Rep. 2015;29:18–20.
Ali N, Blackman DJ, Cunnington M, Malkin CJ. Use of the MANTA device to rescue failed pre-closure following transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Cardiol Cases. 2019;19:81–4.
van Gils L, De Jaegere PP, Roubin G, Van Mieghem NM. The MANTA vascular closure device: a novel device for large-bore vessel closure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:1195–6.
Kastengren M, Svenarud P, Kallner G, Settergren M, Franco-Cereceda A, Dalen M. Percutaneous Vascular Closure Device in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;110:85–91.
Stomp W, Eefting D, van Schaik J, Sudiono DR, van der Meer RW. Antegrade common femoral artery access site closure using the MANTA vascular closure device. Radiol Case Rep. 2020;15:2205–7.
Montero-Cabezas JM, van der Meer RW, van der Kley F, Elzo Kraemer CV, Lopez Matta JE, Schalij MJ, et al. Percutaneous decannulation of femoral venoarterial ECMO cannulas using MANTA vascular closure device. Can J Cardiol. 2019;35(796):e9–11.
Ruck A, Eriksson D, Verouhis D, Saleh N, Linder R, Corbascio M, et al. Percutaneous access and closure using the MANTA vascular closure device in transaxillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2020;16:266–8.
De Palma R, Ruck A, Settergren M, Saleh N. Percutaneous axillary arteriotomy closure during transcatheter aortic valve replacement using the MANTA device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92:998–1001.
Latsios G, Toutouzas K, Karanasos A, Synetos A, Drakopoulou M, Aggeli C, et al. Trans-femoral TAVI: successful hemostasis of a totally calcified femoral artery (“calcium tube”) with the Manta(c) device. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2020;62(2):158–60.
Chaudhuri A. Newer-generation vascular closure devices: plugging the hole in the artery, what about the one in the purse? J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27:977–8.
Funding
This study has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author has received honoraria following educational events from Teleflex.
Ethical Approval
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Informed Consent
For this type of study, informed consent is not required.
Consent for Publication
For this type of study, consent for publication is not required (there is no patient-identifying data).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chaudhuri, A. ‘Post-Close’ Femoral Arterial Haemostasis at Endovascular Aneurysm Repair using a Dedicated Large-Bore Vascular Closure Device: A Prospective Real-World Audit. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 46, 835–843 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03437-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-023-03437-7