Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate endovascular therapy (EVT) as the primary revascularization method for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI).
Methods
A retrospective review was performed on all consecutive patients treated for AMI during a 5-year period (January 2009 to December 2013). EVT was attempted in all patients referred for emergent revascularization. Surgical revascularization was performed selectively after failure of EVT. Patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes were studied. Failures and complications of EVT were recorded.
Results
Fifty patients, aged 79 ± 9 years (mean ± SD), out of 66 consecutive patients with AMI secondary to embolic or thrombotic obstruction of the superior mesenteric artery were referred for revascularization. The etiology of AMI was embolism in 18 (36 %) and thrombosis in 32 (64 %) patients. EVT was technically successful in 44 (88 %) patients. Mortality after successful or failed EVT was 32 %. The rates of emergency laparotomy, bowel resection, and EVT-related complication were 40, 34, and 10 %, respectively. Three out of six patients with failure of EVT were treated with surgical bypass. EVT failure did not significantly affect survival.
Conclusions
EVT is feasible in most cases of AMI, with favorable patient outcome and acceptable complication rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acosta S, Björck M (2014) Modern treatment of acute mesenteric ischaemia. Br J Surg 101:100–108
Menke J (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector CT in acute mesenteric ischemia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 256:93–101
Acosta S, Wadman M, Syk I, Elmståhl S, Ekberg O (2010) Epidemiology and prognostic factors in acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. J Gastrointest Surg 14:628–635
Arthurs ZM, Titus J, Bannazadeh M, Eagleton MJ, Srivastava S, Sarac TP et al (2011) A comparison of endovascular revascularization with traditional therapy for the treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia. J Vasc Surg 53:698–705
Block TA, Acosta S, Björck M (2010) Endovascular and open surgery for acute occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery. J Vasc Surg 52:959–966
Beaulieu RJ, Arnaoutakis KD, Abularrage CJ, Efron DT, Schneider E, Black JH 3rd (2014) Comparison of open and endovascular treatment of acute mesenteric ischemia. J Vasc Surg 59:159–164
Schermerhorn ML, Giles KA, Hamdan AD, Wyers MC, Pomposelli FB (2009) Mesenteric revascularization: management and outcomes in the United States, 1988–2006. J Vasc Surg 50:341–348
Jia Z, Jiang G, Tian F, Zhao J, Li S, Wang K et al (2014) Early endovascular treatment of superior mesenteric occlusion secondary to thromboemboli. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 47:196–203
Acosta S, Sonesson B, Resch T (2009) Endovascular therapeutic approaches for acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 32:896–905
Acosta S (2014) Surgical management of peritonitis secondary to acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. World J Gastroenterol. 20(29):9936–9941
Björnsson S, Resch T, Acosta S (2013) Symptomatic mesenteric atherosclerotic disease—lessons learned from the diagnostic workup. J Gastrointest Surg 17:973–980
White CJ (2011) Chronic mesenteric ischemia: diagnosis and management. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 54(1):36–40
Acosta S, Ögren M, Sternby N-H, Bergqvist D, Björck M (2006) Fatal nonocclusive mesenteric ischaemia: population-based incidence and risk factors. J Intern Med 259:305–313
Conflict of interest
Dr. Petri Saari has received travel expenses from Medtronic and WL Gore to scientific congresses in 2014, unrelated to the current study. Dr. Jussi M Kärkkäinen, Dr. Tiina T Lehtimäki, Prof. Juha Hartikainen, Dr. Tuomo Rantanen, Prof. Hannu Paajanen, and Prof. Hannu Manninen declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kärkkäinen, J.M., Lehtimäki, T.T., Saari, P. et al. Endovascular Therapy as a Primary Revascularization Modality in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38, 1119–1129 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1064-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1064-9