Log in

Morphological Measurement of Asian Osteal Nasal Base for Paranasal Augmentation

  • Original Articles
  • Rhinoplasty
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Paranasal augmentation has been a popular approach in restoring Asian patients’ lateral profile. Irregular surface in the surgical area emphasizes the importance of morphological evidence for the preoperative evaluation and the design of paranasal implants.

Methods

We retrospectively collected craniofacial computer tomography scans of patients in the department of plastic surgery from 2020 to 2022. The imaging data were imported to Mimics (version 20.0; Materialize, Leuven, Belgium) for three-dimensional reconstruction. Measurements of osteal nasal base were performed in 3-matics (version 12.0; Materialize). The severity of paranasal concavity was graded by a senior doctor to study the correlation with measured variables.

Results

Fifty-seven patients with a median age of 27 years (IQR: 22–33) were included in the study. For design of paranasal implants, the lengths of both lower and lateral edge were measured for reference. In the regression analysis, the alar base-alveolar process angle was significantly associated with the degrees of paranasal concavity (OR = 1.222, p = 0.00001).

Conclusions

Morphological data of osteal nasal base were measured and presented in the current study. The analysis supported that alar base-alveolar process angle be used for preoperative grading and evaluation to help guiding treatment decisions.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chien PC, Parks ET, Eraso F, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Ofner S (2009) Comparison of reliability in anatomical landmark identification using two-dimensional digital cephalometrics and three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography in vivo. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 38(5):262–273. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/81889955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de la Peña-Salcedo JA, Soto-Miranda MA, Lopez-Salguero JF (2012) Intranasal surgical approach for malar alloplastic augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 32(1):27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x11430498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dong W, Xu Y, Han R, Zheng R, Fan F (2022) Paranasal augmentation using diced costal cartilage for midface concavity: a retrospective study of 68 patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(2):795–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02593-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fanous N, Yoskovitch A (2000) Premaxillary augmentation: adjunct to rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(3):707–712. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200009030-00031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jeon YT, Han SJ (2019) Comparative study of the effect of paranasal augmentation with autologous bone in orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 77(10):2116–2124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.04.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jianfang Z, Guanhuier W, Yang A, Dong L (2022) Application of 3D imaging-assisted precise aesthetic evaluation in midfacial depression treatment. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(6):2799–2806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-02867-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jianfang Z, Yang A, Dong L (2023) Primary rhinoplasty combined with pyriform aperture augmentation in Asians. Clin Plast Surg 50(1):133–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2022.08.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ** HR, Won TB (2016) Rhinoplasty in the Asian patient. Clin Plast Surg 43(1):265–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2015.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwon TG, Kang SM, Hwang HD (2014) Three-dimensional soft tissue change after paranasal augmentation with porous polyethylene. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43(7):816–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee TY, Chung HY, Dhong ES, Jeong SH, Han SK (2019) Paranasal augmentation using multi-folded expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) in the East Asian nose. Aesthet Surg J 39(12):1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moon KC, Han SK (2018) Surgical anatomy of the Asian nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am 26(3):259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2018.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Park SB, Kim YI, Hwang DS, Lee JY (2013) Midfacial soft-tissue changes after mandibular setback surgery with or without paranasal augmentation: cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) volume superimposition. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41(2):119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Przygocka A, Podgórski M, Jędrzejewski K, Topol M, Polguj M (2012) The location of the infraorbital foramen in human skulls, to be used as new anthropometric landmarks as a useful method for maxillofacial surgery. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 71(3):198–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Raschke R, Hazani R, Yaremchuk MJ (2013) Identifying a safe zone for midface augmentation using anatomic landmarks for the infraorbital foramen. Aesthet Surg J 33(1):13–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820x12468752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roh TS (2019) Commentary on: Paranasal augmentation using multi-folded expanded polytetrafluorethylene (ePTFE) in the East Asian nose. Aesthet Surg J 39(12):1329–1330. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwaiger M, Echlin K, Atherton D, Haers P (2019) The use of Medpor implants for midface contouring in cleft patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48(9):1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.02.008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yaremchuk MJ, Doumit G, Thomas MA (2011) Alloplastic augmentation of the facial skeleton: an occasional adjunct or alternative to orthognathic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(5):2021–2030. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820e9263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yaremchuk MJ, Kachare SD (2022) Invited discussion on: Paranasal augmentation using diced costal cartilage for midface concavity—a retrospective study of 68 patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 46(2):803–804. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-021-02700-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yaremchuk MJ, Vibhakar D (2016) Pyriform aperture augmentation as an adjunct to rhinoplasty. Clin Plast Surg 43(1):187–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cps.2015.09.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yen CI, Chang CS, Chen HC, Yang SY, Chang SY, Yang JY, Chuang SS, Hsiao YC (2021) Paranasal augmentation with composite graft transfer in overresection of alar base and nostril contracture. Ann Plast Surg 86(2):133–136. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000002485

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yen CI, Chen RF, Zelken J, Chang CS, Yang SY, Chen HC, Chang SY, Yang JY, Chuang SS, Hsiao YC (2018) The influence of paranasal augmentation on the measurement of the nose for the treatment of midfacial concavity. Aesthet Surg J 38(3):241–251. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjx166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang J, Li D, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Fan Y, Shi J, Liu S (2022) Application of patient-specific PEEK implant for aesthetic considerations in paranasal augmentation. J Craniofac Surg 33(8):e877–e880. https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000008824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao J, Wang G, Feng N, Chen L, An Y, Li D (2023) The sagittal evaluation and classification of midfacial morphology in Chinese Han youth: a cross-sectional study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 78:62–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2023.01.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao R, Pan B, Li D, An Y (2023) Application of paranasal augmentation rhinoplasty in Asians with midfacial concavity. Ann Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000003428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Key Clinical Projects of Peking University Third Hospital (No. BYSYFY2021005)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang An.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Formal consent and ethical committee approval were not required for this retrospective observational study, which did not contain identifiable personal information.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, M., Wang, G., Zhao, R. et al. Morphological Measurement of Asian Osteal Nasal Base for Paranasal Augmentation. Aesth Plast Surg 48, 1728–1736 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03724-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03724-1

Keywords

Navigation