Log in

Social Media Popularity and Academic Productivity in Academic Plastic Surgery: A Positive Correlation

  • Original Articles
  • Special Topic
  • Published:
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Social media is a powerful tool that has empowered plastic surgeons to easily collaborate with one another and rapidly publicize research progression. The present study investigates the relationship between academic productivity and social media presence among both integrated and independent plastic surgery programs and their faculty.

Methods

Plastic surgery programs on the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons website were included. Faculty were identified via review of each program’s website. Following metrics of academic productivity were collected for each faculty member: h-index, i10-index, number of publications, and number of citations. Online review was then conducted to identify faculty and program Instagram and Twitter accounts, and the number of associated followers and posts.

Results

Integrated plastic surgery programs were more likely to have an Instagram account (p < 0.001), have higher average faculty h-index (p = 0.027), i10-index (p = 0.027), and number of publications (p = 0.042). A number of Instagram followers were significantly associated with average faculty h-index (p < 0.001), i10-index (p < 0.001), and number of publications (p < 0.001). The number of posts on a program’s Instagram significantly predicted average faculty h-index (p < 0.001), i10-index (p < 0.001), and number of publications (p < 0.001). Twitter followers were significantly associated with average faculty h-index (p = 0.0397), i10-index (p = 0.0432), and number of citations (p = 0.00737).

Conclusions

The present study reveals a correlation between metrics of social media popularity and academic productivity of plastic surgeons. We propose that Instagram and Twitter are effective tools with which plastic surgeons may not only publicize their clinical practice, but also rapidly disseminate important innovations among the medical community.

  • Integrated plastic surgery programs and their faculty have significantly higher utilization of social media platforms.

  • The number of followers and posts on a program’s Instagram have a significantly positive correlation with average faculty’s academic productivity.

  • Social media platforms may empower academic plastic surgeons to disseminate their innovations on a larger scale.

No Level Assigned

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gould DJ, Leland HA, Ho AL, Patel KM (2016) Emerging trends in social media and plastic surgery. Ann Transl Med 4(23):4–7. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.12.17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben NY, Duek OS, Rafaeli S, Ullmann Y (2018) Plastic surgery faces the web analysis of the popular social media for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 6(12):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rohrich RJ (2017) So, do you want to be facebook friends? how social media have changed plastic surgery and medicine forever. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(4):1021–1026. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dorfman RG, Mahmood E, Ren A et al (2019) Google ranking of plastic surgeons values social media presence over academic pedigree and experience. Aesthet Surg J 39(4):447–451. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Vardanian AJ, Kusnezov N, Im DD, Lee JC, Jarrahy R (2013) Social media use and impact on plastic surgery practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(5):1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e318287a072

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steele SR, Arshad S, Bush R et al (2015) Social media is a necessary component of surgery practice. Surgery 158(3):857–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mullens CL, Hardy KM, Hernandez JA et al (2020) #PlasticSurgery: a comparative deep dive analysis into social media and plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 146(2):413–422. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Montemurro P, Cheema M, Tamburino S, Hedén P (2019) Online and social media footprint of all Swedish aesthetic plastic surgeons. Aesthetic Plast Surg 43(5):1400–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01392-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Economides JM, Fan KL, Pittman TA (2019) An analysis of plastic surgeons’ social media use and perceptions. Aesthet Surg J 39(7):794–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Asyyed Z, McGuire C, Samargandi O, Al-Youha S, Williams JG (2019) The use of twitter by plastic surgery journals. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(5):1092e–1098e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wheeler CK, Said H, Prucz R, Rodrich RJ, Mathes DW (2011) Social media in plastic surgery practices: emerging trends in North America. Aesthet Surg J 31(4):435–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X11407483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Camp SM, Mills DC (2012) The marriage of plastic surgery and social media: a relationship to last a lifetime. Aesthet Surg J 32(3):349–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X12439862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Patro A, Carr S, Stevens MN, Landeen KC, Cass ND, Haynes DS (2017) Otolaryngology residency program rankings and social media usage: a longitudinal analysis. Laryngoscope 2021:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Micieli JA, Tsui E (2015) Ophthalmology on social networking sites: an observational study of facebook, twitter, and linkedin. Clin Ophthalmol 9:285–290. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S79032

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Chartier C, Chandawarkar AA, Gould DJ, Stevens WG (2021) Insta-grated plastic surgery residencies: 2020 update. Aesthet Surg J 41(3):372–379. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaa216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Steele TN, Galarza-Paez L, Aguilo-Seara G, David LR (2021) Social media impact in the match: a survey of current trends in the United States. Arch Plast Surg 48(1):107–113. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2020.00836

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Irwin TJ, Riesel JN, Ortiz R, Helliwell LA, Lin SJ, Eberlin KR (2021) The impact of social media on plastic surgery residency applicants. Ann Plast Surg 86(3):335–339. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chopan M, Sayadi L, Clark EM, Maguire K (2019) Plastic surgery and social media: examining perceptions. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(4):1259–1265. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kalandar A, Al-Youha S, Al-Halabi B, Williams J (2018) What does the public think? Examining plastic surgery perceptions through the twitterverse. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(1):265–274. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan KL, Graziano F, Economides JM, Black CK, Song DH (2019) The public’s preferences on plastic surgery social media engagement and professionalism: demystifying the impact of demographics. Plast Reconstr Surg 143(2):619–630. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alotaibi NM, Badhiwala JH, Nassiri F et al (2016) The current use of social media in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg 88:619–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alotaibi NM, Guha D, Fallah A et al (2016) Social media metrics and bibliometric profiles of neurosurgical departments and journals: is there a relationship? World Neurosurg 90:574–579. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcem.v12i3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Garner RM, Hirsch JA, Albuquerque FC, Fargen KM (2018) Bibliometric indices: defining academic productivity and citation rates of researchers, departments and journals. J Neurointerv Surg 10(2):102–106. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Therattil PJ, Hoppe IC, Granick MS, Lee ES (2016) Application of the h-index in academic plastic surgery. Ann Plast Surg 76(5):545–549. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000000382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kozak M, Bornmann L (2012) A new family of cumulative indexes for measuring scientific performance. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0047679

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Azoury SC, Mazzaferro DM, Piwnica-Worms W et al (2020) An update on social media in academic plastic surgery training programs: the rising trend of likes, shares, and retweets. Ann Plast Surg 85(2):100–104. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kassambara A (2018) ggplot2. Based publication ready plots, Published online

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cho MJ, Li AY, Furnas HJ, Rohrich RJ (2020) Current trends in the use of social media by plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006936

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Timberlake AT, Wu RT, Cabrejo R, Gabrick K, Persing JA (2018) Harnessing social media to advance research in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(4):1094–1100. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004811

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Duque S, Riccelli V, Mulqueen S, Zhang AY (2021) Global pandemic and PRS residency match: can social media fill the void? Aesthet Surg J. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2012.734863

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas VL, Chavez M, Browne EN, Minnis AM (2020) Instagram as a tool for study engagement and community building among adolescents: a social media pilot study. Digit Health 6:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620904548

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed M. Afifi.

Ethics declarations

Human and Animals Participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mueller, A.M., Wood Matabele, K.L., Edalatpour, A. et al. Social Media Popularity and Academic Productivity in Academic Plastic Surgery: A Positive Correlation. Aesth Plast Surg 47, 2150–2158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03605-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-023-03605-7

Keywords

Navigation