Log in

Bibliometric analysis and visualization of research trends on oblique lumbar interbody fusion surgery

  • Review
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 28 July 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

To determine trends and hot subjects in the field of oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) research during the last decade using bibliometric analysis and visualization tools, in order to assist researchers in exploring new directions for future research in that field.

Methods

Articles published from January 1, 2012, to August 15, 2021, were screened in the Web of Science database. The data were analyzed with CiteSpace software, which generated visualization knowledge maps. All literature was assessed for the following parameters: the number of total publications, distribution, h-index, institutions, journals, authors, co-occurrence state, and research hotspots.

Results

A total of 173 articles were identified. The country with the largest number of articles was China (41.04%), followed by South Korea (20.81%), the USA (15.61%), Japan (9.83%), and Thailand (2.89%). South Korea and the USA had the highest h-index (9), followed by China (8), Japan (7), and Thailand (2). Catholic University of Korea was the organization that produced the most literature. World Neurosurgery published the most papers about OLIF (12.50%), but articles in Spine were most frequently cited (151). Kim JS was the most productive author, whereas Silvestre C was the most cited author. The main research hotspots are anatomy, discectomy, approach, injure, and diseases.

Conclusions

The number of publications in the field of OLIF has increased considerably in recent years. The USA, China, South Korea, and Japan have made substantial contributions to this field. Anatomy, complications, decompression surgery, and application in various degenerative lumbar diseases have been the research hotspots in recent years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Mayer HM (1997) A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:691–700. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199703150-00023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, Roussouly P (2012) Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J 6:89–97. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.89

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Woods KR, Billys JB, Hynes RA (2017) Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates. Spine J 17(4):545 553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2016.10.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hah R, Kang HP (2019) Lateral and oblique lumbar interbody fusion-current concepts and a review of recent literature. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 12(3):305–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09562-6

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li R, Li X, Zhou H, Jiang W (2020) Development and application of oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Surg 12(2):355–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12625

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma Y, Zhou R, Wu Q (2021) Global research hotspots and research trends on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a bibliometric and visualization analysis. Ann Palliat Med 10(8):9057–9068. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-1836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aldawsari K, Alotaibi MT, Alsaleh K (2020) Top 100 cited articles on lumbar spondylolisthesis: a bibliographic analysis. Global Spine J 10(3):353–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219868194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yin M, Xu C, Ma J, Ye J, Mo W (2021) A bibliometric analysis and visualization of current research trends in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Global Spine J 11(6):988–998. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220948832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Badhiwala JH, Nassiri F, Witiw CD, Mansouri A, Alotaibi N, Eagles M, Almenawer SA, da, Costa L, Wilson JR, Fehlings MG (2018) Highly cited works in spinal disorders: the top 100 most cited papers published in Spine Journals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 43(24):1746–1755. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang YD, Li Y, Zhao J, Wang XY, Zhu HZ, Chen XH (2017) Study of acupuncture for low back pain in recent 20 years: a bibliometric analysis via CiteSpace. J Pain Res 10:951–964. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S132808

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo S, Wang L, **e Y, Luo X, Zhang S, **ong L, Ai H, Yuan Z, Wang J (2019) Bibliometric and visualized analysis of stem cells therapy for spinal cord injury based on Web of Science and CiteSpace in the last 20 years. World Neurosurg 132:e246–e258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.08.191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li Y, Xu G, Long X, Ho YS (2019) A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics. J Orthop Surg Res 14(1):227. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1247-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yin, M., Wang, H., Sun, Y., Xu, C., Ye, J., Ma, J., Wang, D., Mo, W., (2021) Global trends of researches on lumbar spinal stenosis: a bibliometric and visualization study. Clin Spine Surg ,23. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001160. Online ahead of print.

  14. Du X, Ou YS, Zhu Y, Luo W, Jiang GY, Jiang DM (2020) Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in the surgical treatment of single-segment lumbar tuberculosis: a single-center retrospective comparative study. Int J Surg 83:39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.09.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li JX, Phan K, Mobbs R (2017) Oblique lumbar interbody fusion: technical aspects, operative outcomes, and complications. World Neurosurg 98:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu J, Feng H (2020) Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) with supplemental anterolateral screw and rod instrumentation: a preliminary clinical study. World Neurosurg 134:e944–e950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin GX, Kotheeranurak V, Zeng TH, Mahatthanatrakul A, Kim JS (2019) A longitudinal investigation of the endplate cystic lesion effect on oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 184:105407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105407

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. He W, He D, Sun Y, **ng Y, Wen J, Wang W, ** Y, Liu M, Tian W, Ye X (2020) Standalone oblique lateral interbody fusion vs. combined with percutaneous pedicle screw in spondylolisthesis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21(1):184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03192-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin GX, Rui G, Sharma S, Mahatthanatrakul A, Kim JS (2021) The correlation of intraoperative distraction of intervertebral disc with the postoperative canal and foramen expansion following oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 30(1):151–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06604-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Abe K, Orita S, Mannoji C, Motegi H, Aramomi M, Ishikawa T, Kotani T, Akazawa T, Morinaga T, Fujiyoshi T, Hasue F, Yamagata M, Hashimoto M, Yamauchi T, Eguchi Y, Suzuki M, Hanaoka E, Inage K, Sato J, Fujimoto K, Shiga Y, Kanamoto H, Yamauchi K, Nakamura J, Suzuki T, Hynes RA, Aoki Y, Takahashi K, Ohtori S (2017) Perioperative complications in 155 patients who underwent oblique lateral interbody fusion surgery: perspectives and indications from a retrospective, multicenter survey. Spine 42(1):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fujibayashi S, Hynes RA, Otsuki B, Kimura H, Takemoto M, Matsuda S (2015) Effect of indirect neural decompression through oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(3):E175-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lykissas MG, Aichmair A, Hughes AP, Sama AA, Lebl DR, Taher F, Du JY, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP (2014) Nerve injury after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a review of 919 treated levels with identification of risk factors. Spine J 14(5):749–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.066

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Regev GJ, Chen L, Dhawan M, Lee YP, Garfin SR, Kim CW (2009) Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(12):1330–5. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a029e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Quillo-Olvera J, Lin GX, Jo HJ, Kim JS (2018) Complications on minimally invasive oblique lumbar interbody fusion at L2-L5 levels: a review of the literature and surgical strategies. Ann Transl Med 6(6):101. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.01.22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Park SJ, Lee CS, Chung SS, Kang SS, Park HJ, Kim SH (2017) The ideal cage position for achieving both indirect neural decompression and segmental angle restoration in lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Clin Spine Surg 30(6):E784–E790. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, grant number 2021J05282; and funded by the “**amen Health High-Level Talent Training Program.”

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Writing – original draft: Guang-Xun Lin; Validation: **-Niang Nan; Investigation: Li-Wei Sun; Software: Shang-Wun Jhang; Methodology: Kuo-Tai Chen; Supervision: Ching-Ting Tai; Project administration: Bao-Shan Hu; Interpreted of data: G. Rui; Writing – review & editing: Chien-Min Chen.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chien-Min Chen, Gang Rui or Bao-Shan Hu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, GX., Nan, JN., Chen, KT. et al. Bibliometric analysis and visualization of research trends on oblique lumbar interbody fusion surgery. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 46, 1597–1608 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05316-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05316-1

Keywords

Navigation