Abstract
Conventional radiography is the most commonly used imaging modality for the evaluation of osteoarthritis (OA) in clinical trials of disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs). Unfortunately, radiography has many shortcomings as an imaging technique to meaningfully assess the pathological features of OA. In this perspective paper, we will describe the reasons why radiography is not an ideal tool for structural OA assessment and why magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be preferred for such purposes. These shortcomings include a lack of reproducibility of radiographic joint space measurements (if conducted without using a standardized positioning frame), a lack of sensitivity and specificity, an insufficient definition of disease severity, a weak association of radiographic structural damage and pain, a lack of ability to depict many faces of OA, and incapability to depict diagnoses of exclusion. MRI offers solutions to these limitations of radiography. Several different phenotypes of OA have been recognized and it is important to recruit appropriate patients for specific therapeutic approaches in DMOAD trials. Radiography does not allow such phenotypical stratification. We will explain known hurdles for widespread deployment of MRI at eligibility screening and how they can be overcome by technological advances and the use of simplified image assessment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Duryea J, Neumann G, Niu J, et al. Comparison of radiographic joint space width with magnetic resonance imaging cartilage morphometry: analysis of longitudinal data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62(7):932–7.
Kothari M, Guermazi A, von Ingersleben G, et al. Fixed-flexion radiography of the knee provides reproducible joint space width measurements in osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:1568–73.
Kinds MB, Vincken KL, Hop**a TN, et al. Influence of variation in semiflexed knee positioning during image acquisition on separate quantitative radiographic parameters of osteoarthritis, measured by Knee Images Digital Analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012;20(9):997–1003.
Chan EF, Cockman MD, Goel P, Newman PS, Hipp JA. Chracterization of the mid-coronal plane method for measurement of radiographic change in knee joint space width across different levels of image parallax. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021;29(9):1306–13.
Guermazi A, Niu J, Hayashi D, et al. Prevalence of abnormalities in knees detected by MRI in adults without knee osteoarthritis: population based observational study (Framingham Osteoarthritis Study). BMJ. 2012;345:e5339.
Del Grande F, Rashidi A, Luna R, et al. Five-minute five-sequence knee MRI using combined simultaneous multislice and parallel imaging acceleration: comparison with 10-minute parallel imaging knee MRI. Radiology. 2021;299(3):635–46.
Huang J, Wang S, Zhou G, Hu W, Yu G. Evaluation on the generalization of a learned convolutional neural network for MRI reconstruction. Magn Reason Imaging. 2022;87:38–46.
Hunter DJ, Guermazi A, Lo GH, et al. Evolution of semi-quantitative whole joint assessment of knee OA: MOAKS (MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score). Osteoarthr Cartil. 2011;19(8):990–1002.
Roemer FW, Collins J, Kwoh CK, et al. MRI-based screening for structural definition of eligibility in clinical DMOAD trials: rapid osteoarthritis MRI eligibility score (ROAMES). Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020;28(1):71–81.
Roemer FW, Collins JE, Neogi T, Crema MD, Guermazi A. Association of knee OA structural phenotypes to risk for progression: a secondary analysis from the Foundation for National Institutes of Health Osteoarthritis Biomarkers study (FNIH). Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020;28(9):1220–8.
Ali SA, Espin-Garcia O, Wong AK, et al. Circulating microRNAs differentiate fast-progressing from slow-progressing and non-progressing knee osteoarthritis in the osteoarthritis initiative cohort. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2022;14:1759720X221082917.
Crema MD, Felson DT, Guermazi A, et al. Is the atrophic phenotype of tibiofemoral osteoarthritis associated with faster progression of disease? The MOST study. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2017;25(10):1647–53.
Roemer FW, Zhang Y, Niu J, Lynch JA, et al. Tibiofemoral joint osteoarthritis: risk factors for MR-depicted fast cartilage loss over a 30-month period in the multicenter osteoarthritis study. Radiology. 2009;252:772–80.
Mori Y, Mori N. Rapid progression of joint deformity after subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee with medial meniscal root tear. Jpn J Radiol. 2022;40(7):749–50.
Jarraya M, Roemer FW, Ashbeck EL, Lynch J, Kwoh CK, Guermazi A. Addressing potential safety signals and potential non-response in knee osteoarthritis clinical trials: prevalence of MRI-based exclusionary findings based on data from the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI). Osteoarthr Cartil. 2022;30(1):S109.
Wilmot AS, Ruutiainen AT, Bakhru PT, Schweitzer ME, Shabshin N. Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee: a recognizable associated soft tissue edema pattern and a similar distribution among men and women. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:2096–103.
LaPrade CM, Foad A, Smith SD, et al. Biomechanical consequences of a nonanatomic posterior medial meniscal root repair. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:912–20.
Smigielski R, Becker R, Zdanowicz U, Ciszek B. Medial meniscus anatomy-from basic science to treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:8–14.
Guermazi A, Hayashi D, Jarraya M, et al. Medial posterior meniscal root tears are associated with development or worsening of medial tibiofemoral cartilage damage: the multicenter osteoarthritis study. Radiology. 2013;268:814–21.
Ra HJ, Ha JK, Jang HS, Kim JG. Traumatic posterior root tear of the medial meniscus in patients with severe medial instability of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:3121–6.
Hannan MT, Felson DT, Pincus T. Analysis of the discordance between radiographic changes and knee pain in osteoarthritis of the knee. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:1513–7.
Perry TA, Parkes MJ, Hodgson RJ, Felson DT, Arden NK, O’Neill TW. Association between bone marrow lesions and synovitis and symptoms in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2020;28(3):316–23.
Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Hayashi D, et al. Assessment of synovitis with contrast-enhanced MRI using a whole-joint semiquantitative scoring system in people with, or at high risk of, knee osteoarthritis. The MOST study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(5):805–11.
Zhang Y, Nevitt MC, Niu J, et al. Fluctuation of knee pain and changes in bone marrow lesions, effusions, and synovitis on magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 2011;63(3):691–9.
Neogi T, Felson DT, Niu J, et al. Association between radiographic features of knee osteoarthritis and pain: results from two cohort studies. BMJ. 2009;339:b2844.
Bensalma F, Hagemeister N, Cagnin A, et al. Biomechanical markers associations with pain, symptoms, and disability compared to radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis patients: a secondary analysis from a cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):896.
Neogi T, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, et al. Association of joint inflammation with pain sensitization in knee osteoarthritis: the multicenter osteoarthritis study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:654–61.
Roemer FW, Jarraya M, Collins JE, et al. Structural phenotypes of knee osteoarthritis: potential clinical and research relevance. Skeletal Radiol 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04191-6. Online ahead of print.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
AG: received consultancy fees from Pfizer, Novartis, MerckSerono, TissueGene, AstraZeneca, and Regeneron. He is a shareholder, president, and director of Musculoskeletal Imaging of Boston Imaging Core Lab., LLC.
FWR: consultant to Calibr and Grünenthal. He is a shareholder, Chief Medical Officer, Director of Research, and Director of Artificial Intelligence of Boston Imaging Core Lab., LLC.
MJ: nothing to disclose.
DH: received publication royalties from Wolters Kluwer.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Guermazi, A., Roemer, F.W., Jarraya, M. et al. A call for screening MRI as a tool for osteoarthritis clinical trials. Skeletal Radiol 52, 2011–2019 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04354-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-023-04354-z