Log in

Environmental DNA Sequencing to Monitor Restoration Practices on Soil Bacterial and Archaeal Communities in Soils Under Desertification in the Brazilian Semiarid

  • Note
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soils from Brazilian semiarid regions are highly vulnerable to desertification due to their geology, climate, human actions, and intensive land use that contribute to desertification. Therefore, areas under desertification have increased in the Brazilian semiarid region and it has negatively changed the soil bacterial and archaeal communities and their functionality. On the other hand, although restoration strategies are expensive and there are few soils restoration programs, some practices have been applied to restore these soils under desertification. For instance, conservationist practices and grazing exclusion have been strategically implemented, and they created a new altered soil condition for soil microbial communities, boosting soil microbial diversity. Here, we discuss the potential of these restoration strategies to recover the richness and diversity of soil bacterial and archaeal communities that were described through environmental DNA (eDNA) sequencing of soil samples. eDNA sequencing results show that areas where restoration strategies have been applied in regions under desertification in the Brazilian semiarid have increased species richness, diversity, and structure of the bacterial and archaeal community. In addition, network connectivity and functionality of the soil microorganisms have been improved over time. Altogether, we show that management strategies for soil restoration have positive effects on soil microbial communities and these effects can be monitored using the eDNA sequencing approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Data Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Albuquerque DS, Souza SDG, Souza CAN, Sousa MLM (2020) Desertification scenario in Brazilian territory and actions to combat the problem in the State of Ceará, Brazilian Northeast. Soc Ambient Semiárido 55:673–696

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almeida-Filho R, Carvalho CM (2010) Map** land degradation in the Gilbues region, northeastern Brazil, using Landsat TM images. Int J Rem Sens 31:1087–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Araujo ASF, Cesarz S, Leite LFC et al (2013) Soil microbial properties and temporal stability in degraded and restored lands of Northeast Brazil. Soil Biol Biochem 43:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Araujo ASF, Tsai SM, Daniel CB, Cesarz S, Eisenhauer N (2014) Soil bacterial diversity in degraded and restored lands of Northeast Brazil. Anto van Lee 106:891–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Araujo ASF, Rocha SMB, Antunes JEL et al (2022) Ecosystem functions in different physiognomies of Cerrado through the rapid ecosystem function assessment (REFA). Anais Acad Bras Ci 94:e20200457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bach EM, Ramirez KS, Fraser TD, Wall DH (2020) Soil biodiversity integrates solutions for a sustainable future. Sustainability 12:2662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bardgett R, Freeman C, Ostle N (2008) Microbial contributions to climate change through carbon cycle feedbacks. ISME J 2:805–814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi J, Yang F, Stepanauskas R, Cardenas E, Garoutte A, Williams R et al (2017) Strategies to improve reference databases for soil microbiomes. ISME J 11:829–834

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen WM, Moulin L, Bontemps C et al (2003) legume symbiotic nitrogen fixation by beta-proteobacteria is widespread in nature. J Bacteriol 185:7266–7272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Coban O, De Deyn GB, Ploeg M (2022) Soil microbiota as game-changers in restoration of degraded lands. Science 375:990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Crits-Christoph A, Robinson CK, Barnum T, Fricke WF, Davila AF, Jedynak B, McKay CP, DiRuggiero J (2013) Colonization patterns of soil microbial communities in the Atacama Desert. Microbiome 1:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Odorico P, Bhattachan A, Davis KF et al (2013) Global desertification: drivers and feedbacks. Adv Water Resour 51:326–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan M, Li J, Tang Z, Shangguan Z (2020) Soil bacterial community succession during desertification in a desert steppe ecosystem. Land Degrad Develop 31:1662–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Faust K, Raes J (2012) Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:538–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gu Y, Bai Y, **ang Q et al (2018) (2018) Degradation shaped bacterial and archaeal communities with predictable taxa and their association patterns in Zoige wetland at Tibet plateau. Sci Rep 8:3884

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hugerth LW, Andersson AF (2017) Analysing microbial community composition through amplicon sequencing: from sampling to hypothesis testing. Fron Microbiol 8:1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jones B, Goodall T, George PBL et al (2021) Beyond taxonomic identification: integration of ecological responses to a soil bacterial 16S rRNA gene database. Front Microbiol 12:682886

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lal R (2015) Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability 7:5875–5895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Q, Song A, Yang H, Müller WEG (2021) Impact of rocky desertification control on soil bacterial community in Karst Graben Basin, Southwestern China. Front Microbiol 12:636405

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lima NMM, Muñoz-Rojas M, Vázquez-Campos X (2021) Biocrust cyanobacterial composition, diversity, and environmental drivers in two contrasting climatic regions in Brazil. Geoderma 386:114914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maia LC, Carvalho Junior AA, Cavalcanti LH et al (2015) Diversity of Brazilian fungi. Rodriguésia 66(4):1033–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mendes LW, Braga LPP, Navarrete AA et al (2017) Using metagenomics to connect microbial community biodiversity and functions. Curr Issues Mol Biol 24:103–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oliveira Filho JS, Vieira JN et al (2019) Assessing the effects of 17 years of grazing exclusion in degraded semi-arid soils: evaluation of soil fertility, nutrients pools and stoichiometry. J Arid Environ 166:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pereira APA, Lima LAL, Bezerra WM et al (2021) Grazing exclusion regulates bacterial community in highly degraded semiarid soils from Brazilian Caatinga biome. Land Degrad Dev 32:2210–2225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pereira APA, Mendes LW, Oliveira FAZ et al (2022) Land degradation affects the microbial communities in the Brazilian Caatinga biome. CATENA 211:105961

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rothacker L, Dosseto A, Francke A et al (2018) Impact of climate change and human activity on soil landscapes over the past 12,300 years. Sci Rep 8:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Thomsen PF, Willerslev E (2015) Environmental DNA – an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol Conservat 183:4–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Williams MAJ (2000) Desertification: general debates explored through local studies. Progr Environ Sci 2:229–251

    Google Scholar 

  29. World Atlas of Desertification (2018) Rethinking land degradation and sustainable management. 3rd edition. Luxembourg

  30. Xue L, Ren H, Li S, Leng X, Yao X (2017) Soil bacterial community structure and co-occurrence pattern during vegetation restoration in karst rocky desertification area. Front Microbiol 8:2377

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang W, **g X, Guan Y et al (2019) Response of fungal communities and co-occurrence network patterns to compost amendment in black soil of Northeast China. Front Microbiol 10:1562

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Centro de Genética e Bioinformática (CeGenBio) from Universidade Federal do Ceara (NPDM/UFC). Ademir S. F. Araujo, Arthur P. A. Pereira, Vania M. M. Melo, Erika V. Medeiros, and Lucas W. Mendes acknowledge Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnologico – CNPq (grants 305069/2018-1; 402646/2021-5; 313254/2021-4; 323422/2021-8; 307670/2021-0, respectively). Lucas W. Mendes acknowledges Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo—FAPESP (grants 2019/16043-7 and 2020/12890-4).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ademir Sergio Ferreira Araujo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Araujo, A.S.F., de Araujo Pereira, A.P., Melo, V.M.M. et al. Environmental DNA Sequencing to Monitor Restoration Practices on Soil Bacterial and Archaeal Communities in Soils Under Desertification in the Brazilian Semiarid. Microb Ecol 85, 1072–1076 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-022-02048-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-022-02048-y

Keywords

Navigation