Log in

Utility of Hand-Held Echocardiography in Outpatient Pediatric Cardiology Management

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Adult patient series have shown hand-held echocardiography (echo) units (HHE) to be accurate for rapid diagnosis and triage. This is the first study to evaluate the ability of HHE to inform decision making in outpatient pediatric cardiology. New pediatric cardiology patients in outpatient clinics staffed by six pediatric cardiologists (experience 1–17 years) were prospectively enrolled if an echocardiogram (echo) was ordered during their initial visit. After history and physical examination and before a standard echo, the cardiologists performed a bedside HHE examination (GE Vscan 1.7–3.8 MHz), documented findings, and made a clinical decision. Diagnoses and decisions based on HHE were compared with final management after the standard echo. The study enrolled 101 subjects (ages 9 days to 19 years). The cardiologists considered HHE imaging adequate for decision making for 80 of the 101 subjects. For 77 of the 80 subjects with acceptable HHE imaging (68/68 normal and 9/12 abnormal standard echoes), the HHE-based primary diagnoses and decisions agreed with the final management. The sensitivity of HHE was 75 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 43–94 %) and the positive predictive value 100 % (95 % CI 66–100 %) for pediatric heart disease. The agreement between standard echocardiography and HHE imaging was substantial (κ = 0.82). Excluding one of the least experienced cardiologists, HHE provided the basis for correct cardiac diagnoses and management for all the subjects with acceptable HHE imaging (58/58 normal and 9/9 abnormal echoes). In outpatient pediatric cardiology, HHE has potential as a tool to complement physical examination. Further investigation is needed to evaluate how value improves with clinical experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersen GN, Haugen BO, Graven T, Salvesen O, Mjolstad OC, Dalen H (2011) Feasibility and reliability of point-of-care pocket-sized echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 12:665–670. doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jer108

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaton A, Aliku T, Okello E, Lubega S, McCarter R, Lwabi P, Sable C (2014) The utility of handheld echocardiography for early diagnosis of rheumatic heart disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27:42–49. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2013.09.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Biais M, Carrie C, Delaunay F, Morel N, Revel P, Janvier G (2012) Evaluation of a new pocket echoscopic device for focused cardiac ultrasonography in an emergency setting. Crit Care 16:R82. doi:10.1186/cc11340

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruce CJ, Montgomery SC, Bailey KR, Tajik J, Seward JB (2002) Utility of hand-carried ultrasound devices used by cardiologists with and without significant echocardiographic experience in the cardiology inpatient and outpatient settings. Am J Cardiol 90:1273–1275 S0002914902028539 [pii]

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardim N, Fernandez Golfin C, Ferreira D, Aubele A, Toste J, Cobos MA, Carmelo V, Nunes I, Oliveira AG, Zamorano J (2010) Usefulness of a new miniaturized echocardiographic system in outpatient cardiology consultations as an extension of physical examination. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:117–124. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.09.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi BG, Mukherjee M, Dala P, Young HA, Tracy CM, Katz RJ, Lewis JF (2011) Interpretation of remotely downloaded pocket-size cardiac ultrasound images on a Web-enabled smartphone: validation against workstation evaluation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:1325–1330. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2011.08.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Croft LB, Duvall WL, Goldman ME (2006) A pilot study of the clinical impact of hand-carried cardiac ultrasound in the medical clinic. Echocardiography 23:439–446. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8175.2006.00240.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Culp BC, Mock JD, Chiles CD, Culp WC Jr (2010) The pocket echocardiograph: validation and feasibility. Echocardiography 27:759–764. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8175.2009.01125.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalla Pozza R, Loeff M, Kozlik-Feldmann R, Netz H (2010) Hand-carried ultrasound devices in pediatric cardiology: clinical experience with three different devices in 110 patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:1231–1237. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.08.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis JA, Cecchin F, Jones TK, Portman MA (2001) Major coronary artery anomalies in a pediatric population: incidence and clinical importance. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:593–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fedson S, Neithardt G, Thomas P, Lickerman A, Radzienda M, DeCara JM, Lang RM, Spencer KT (2003) Unsuspected clinically important findings detected with a small portable ultrasound device in patients admitted to a general medicine service. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:901–905. doi:10.1016/S0894-7317(03)00426-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Galderisi M, Santoro A, Versiero M, Lomoriello VS, Esposito R, Raia R, Farina F, Schiattarella PL, Bonito M, Olibet M, de Simone G (2010) Improved cardiovascular diagnostic accuracy by pocket size imaging device in noncardiologic outpatients: the NaUSiCa (Naples Ultrasound Stethoscope in Cardiology) study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 8:51. doi:10.1186/1476-7120-8-51

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ippisch HM, Kimball TR (2007) The impact of evolving hand-carried echocardiographic technology on outpatient physical examination accuracy in pediatric cardiology. Congenit Heart Dis 2:170–178. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0803.2007.00052.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kimura BJ (2010) What is an echo machine? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:1238–1241. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lai WW, Geva T, Shirali GS, Frommelt PC, Humes RA, Brook MM, Pignatelli RH, Rychik J (2006) Guidelines and standards for performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19:1413–1430. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2006.09.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lytrivi ID, Wong AH, Ko HH, Chandra S, Nielsen JC, Srivastava S, Lai WW, Parness IA (2008) Echocardiographic diagnosis of clinically silent congenital coronary artery anomalies. Int J Cardiol 126:386–393. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.04.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Michalski B, Kasprzak JD, Szymczyk E, Lipiec P (2012) Diagnostic utility and clinical usefulness of the pocket echocardiographic device. Echocardiography 29:1–6. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01553.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mjolstad OC, Dalen H, Graven T, Kleinau JO, Salvesen O, Haugen BO (2012) Routinely adding ultrasound examinations by pocket-sized ultrasound devices improves inpatient diagnostics in a medical department. Eur J Intern Med 23:185–191. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2011.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pershad J, Myers S, Plouman C, Rosson C, Elam K, Wan J, Chin T (2004) Bedside limited echocardiography by the emergency physician is accurate during evaluation of the critically ill patient. Pediatrics 114:e667–e671. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-0881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Prinz C, Dohrmann J, van Buuren F, Bitter T, Bogunovic N, Horstkotte D, Faber L (2012) The importance of training in echocardiography: a validation study using pocket echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Med Hagerstown 13:700–707. doi:10.2459/JCM.0b013e328356a55f

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Roelandt J, Wladimiroff JW, Baars AM (1978) Ultrasonic real-time imaging with a hand-held-scanner: part II. Initial clinical experience. Ultrasound Med Biol 4:93–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sicari R, Galderisi M, Voigt JU, Habib G, Zamorano JL, Lancellotti P, Badano LP (2011) The use of pocket-size imaging devices: a position statement of the European Association of Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 12:85–87. doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jeq184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Skjetne K, Graven T, Haugen BO, Salvesen O, Kleinau JO, Dalen H (2011) Diagnostic influence of cardiovascular screening by pocket-size ultrasound in a cardiac unit. Eur J Echocardiogr 12:737–743. doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jer111

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Spencer KT, Kimura BJ, Korcarz CE, Pellikka PA, Rahko PS, Siegel RJ (2013) Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 26:567–581. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2013.04.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Spurney CF, Sable CA, Berger JT, Martin GR (2005) Use of a hand-carried ultrasound device by critical care physicians for the diagnosis of pericardial effusions, decreased cardiac function, and left ventricular enlargement in pediatric patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18:313–319. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2004.10.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Testuz A, Muller H, Keller PF, Meyer P, Stampfli T, Sekoranja L, Vuille C, Burri H (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of pocket-size handheld echocardiographs used by cardiologists in the acute care setting. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14:38–42. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jes085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trambaiolo P, Papetti F, Posteraro A, Amici E, Piccoli M, Cerquetani E, Pastena G, Gambelli G, Salustri A (2007) A hand-carried cardiac ultrasound device in the outpatient cardiology clinic reduces the need for standard echocardiography. Heart 93:470–475. doi:10.1136/hrt.2006.094201

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vourvouri EC, Poldermans D, Deckers JW, Parharidis GE, Roelandt JR (2005) Evaluation of a hand carried cardiac ultrasound device in an outpatient cardiology clinic. Heart 91:171–176. doi:10.1136/hrt.2003.028225

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by a Children’s National Medical Center Board of Visitors Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Riley.

Appendix

Appendix

Study questionnaire completed by cardiologists after HHE

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riley, A., Sable, C., Prasad, A. et al. Utility of Hand-Held Echocardiography in Outpatient Pediatric Cardiology Management. Pediatr Cardiol 35, 1379–1386 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-0940-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-0940-4

Keywords

Navigation