Abstract
Density functional theory calculations with the M06-2X exchange–correlation functional have been performed to explore the Diels–Alder reaction between 2,5-DMF and ethylene as well as to compare the uncatalyzed reaction to the one catalyzed by the AlCl3 Lewis acid. The uncatalyzed reaction corresponds to a normal electron-demand (NED) mechanism where ethylene is an electron acceptor and 2,5-DMF plays the role of electron donor. This reaction presents a low polar character, its kinetics is little impacted by the solvent dielectric constant, and the formation of the two new σ bonds occurs through a one-step synchronous process. When the LA interacts with ethylene, forming a π-complex, it enhances its acceptor character, further favoring the NED mechanism, which is accompanied by a reduction of the free energy of the transition state. On the other hand, when AlCl3 is complexed by 2,5-DMF, the inverse electron-demand (IED) mechanism is favored, with ethylene playing the role of the donor. Within both NED and IED mechanism, the LA-catalyzed reaction takes place via a one-step asynchronous process. In addition, it is highly polar, so that the activation barrier decreases with the solvent polarity. Moreover, the calculations have evidenced that the LA forms stable complexes with any of the reactants so that the gain on the activation barrier amounts to 9–12 kcal mol−1 for the NED mechanism and to 3–9 kcal mol−1 for the IED one and that the formation of Al2Cl6 dimers impacts the different equilibria. Finally, the decrease of the activation barrier goes in pair with the reduction of the HOMO–LUMO gap, with the greatest decrease recorded when the LA interacts with ethylene according to the NED mechanism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Briefing US (2013) International Energy Outlook. US Energy Information Administration
Huber GW, Iborra S, Corma A (2006) Chem Rev 106:4044–4098
Alonso DM, Bond JQ, Dumesic JA (2010) Green Chem 12:1493–1513
Mettler MS, Vlachos DG, Dauenhauer PJ (2012) Energy Environ Sci 5:7797–7809
Schmidt LD, Dauenhauer PJ (2007) Nature 447:914–915
Tong X, Ma Y, Li Y (2010) Appl Catal A 385:1–13
West RM, Kunkes EL, Simonetti DA, Dumesic JA (2009) Catal Today 147:115–125
Nikolla E, Román-Leshkov Y, Moliner M, Davis ME (2011) ACS Catal 1:408–410
**a H, Xu S, Hu H, An J, Li C (2018) RSC Adv 8:30875–30886
Hu L, Tang X, Xu J, Wu Z, Lin L, Liu S (2014) Ind Eng Chem Res 53:3056–3064
Kumalaputri AJ, Bottari G, Erne PM, Heeres HJ, Barta K (2014) Chemsuschem 7:2266–2275
Iriondo A, Mendiguren A, Güemez MB, Requies J, Cambra JF (2017) Catal Today 279:286–295
Casanova O, Iborra S, Corma A (2009) Chemsuschem 2:1138–1144
Pacheco JJ, Labinger JA, Sessions AL, Davis ME (2015) ACS Catal 5:5904–5913
Pacheco JJ, Davis ME (2014) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:8363–8367
Pang J, Zheng M, Sun R, Wang A, Wang X, Zhang T (2016) Green Chem 18:342–359
Nikbin N, Do PT, Caratzoulas S, Lobo RF, Dauenhauer PJ, Vlachos DG (2013) J Catal 297:35–43
Nikbin N, Feng S, Caratzoulas S, Vlachos DG (2014) J Phys Chem C 118:24415–24424
Rohling RY, Tranca IC, Hensen EJ, Pidko EA (2018) J Phys Chem C 122:14733–14743
Rohling RY, Tranca IC, Hensen EJ, Pidko EA (2018) ACS Catal 9:376–391
Patet RE, Nikbin N, Williams CL, Green SK, Chang CC, Fan W, Vlachos DG (2015) ACS Catal 5:2367–2375
Patet RE, Fan W, Vlachos DG, Caratzoulas S (2017) ChemCatChem 9:2523–2535
Li YP, Head-Gordon M, Bell AT (2014) J Phys Chem C 118:22090–22095
Chang CC, Cho HJ, Yu J, Gorte RJ, Gulbinski J, Dauenhauer P, Fan W (2016) Green Chem 18:1368–1376
Kim TW, Kim SY, Kim JC, Kim Y, Ryoo R, Kim CU (2016) Appl Catal B 185:100–109
Williams CL, Chang CC, Do P, Nikbin N, Caratzoulas S, Vlachos DG, Dauenhauer PJ (2012) ACS Catal 2:935–939
Song S, Wu G, Dai W, Guan N, Li L (2016) J Mol Catal A Chem 420:134–141
Feng X, Shen C, Tian C, Tan T (2017) Ind Eng Chem Res 56:5852–5859
Diels O, Alder K (1928) Justus Liebigs Ann Chem 460:98–122
Diels O, Alder K (1929) Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 62:554–562
Diels O, Alder K (1929) Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 62:2087–2090
Fukui K (1982) Science 218:747–754
Adjieufack AI, Liégeois V, Mbouombouo Ndassa I, Ketcha Mbadcam J, Champagne B (2018) J Phys Chem A 122:7472–7481
Domingo LR, Aurell MJ, Perez P, Saez JA (2012) RSC Adv 2:1334–1342
Çelebi-Ölçüm N, Ess DH, Aviyente V, Houk KN (2008) J Org Chem 73:7472–7480
Pi Z, Li S (2006) J Phys Chem A 110:9225–9230
Domingo LR, Asensio A, Arroyo P (2002) J Phys Org Chem 15:660–666
Yamabe S, Minato T (2000) J Org Chem 65(6):1830–1841
García JI, Martinez-Merino V, Mayoral JA, Salvatella L (1998) J Am Chem Soc 120(10):2415–2420
Suárez D, Sordo TL, Sordo JA (1994) J Am Chem Soc 116:763–764
Gonzalez J, Houk KN (1992) J Org Chem 57:3031–3037
Guner OF, Ottenbrite RM, Shillady DD, Alston PV (1987) J Org Chem 52:391–394
Hamlin TA, Bickelhaupt FM, Fernández I (2021) Acc Chem Res 54:1972–1981
Salavati-fard T, Caratzoulas S, Doren DJ (2015) J Phys Chem A 119:9834–9843
Domingo LR, Sáez JA (2009) Org Biomol Chem 7:3576–3583
Domingo LR (2014) RSC Adv 4:32415–32428
Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Pérez P (2020) Molecules 25:2535–2560
Yates P, Eaton P (1960) J Am Chem Soc 82:4436–4437
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) Theor Chem Acc 120:215–241
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2006) J Chem Phys 125:194101
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2006) J Phys Chem A 110:13126–13130
Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG (1988) Phys Rev B 37:785–789
Becke AD (1993) J Chem Phys 98:5648–5652
Chai JD, Head-Gordon M (2008) Phys Chem Chem Phys 10(44):6615–6620
Dunning TH, Peterson KA, Woon DE (1998). In: Schleyer PVR, Allinger NL, Clark T, Gasteiger J, Kollman P, Schaefer HF III, Schreiner PR (eds) The Encyclopedia Of Computational Chemistry, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester, p 88
Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R (2005) Chem Rev 105:2999–3094
Kelly CP, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG (2005) J Chem Theory Comput 1:1133–1152
Reed AE, Curtiss LA, Weinhold F (1988) Chem Rev 88:899–926
Parr RG, Yang W (1989) Density functional theory of atoms and molecules. Oxford University Press, New York
Geerlings P, De Proft F, Langenaeker W (2003) Chem Rev 103:1793–1873
Domingo LR, Rios-Gutiérrez M, Pérez P (2016) Molecules 21:748–769
Parr RG, von Szentpaly L, Liu S (1999) J Am Chem Soc 121:1922–1924
Parr RG, Pearson RG (1983) J Am Chem Soc 105:7512–7516
Domingo LR, Chamorro E, Pérez P (2008) J Org Chem 73:4615–4624
Domingo LR, Aurell MJ, Pérez P, Contreras R (2002) Tetrahedron 58:4417–4423
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Keith T, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo J, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ (2015) Gaussian 09 Revision E.01. Gaussian Inc, Wallingford CT
Jaramillo P, Domingo LR, Chamorro E, Pérez P (2008) J Molec Struct (THEOCHEM) 865:68–72
Champagne B, Mosley DH, Fripiat JG, André JM, Bernard A, Bettonville S, François P, Momtaz A (1998) J Molec Struct (THEOCHEM) 454:149–159
Champagne B, Cavillot V, André JM, François P, Momtaz A (2006) Int J Quantum Chem 106:588–598
Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Pérez P (2020) RSC Adv 10:15394–15405
Domingo LR, Kula K, Ríos-Gutiérrez M (2020) Eur J Org Chem 2020:5938–5948
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research of Tunisia, which financially supported this work. M.C. is grateful to UNamur for financially contributing to his research stay. The calculations were performed on the computers of the « Consortium des équipements de Calcul Intensif (CÉCI) » (http://www.ceci-hpc.be), including those of the « UNamur Technological Platform of High-Performance Computing (PTCI) » (http://www.ptci.unamur.be), for which we gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the FNRS-FRFC, the Walloon Region, and the University of Namur (Conventions No. 2.5020.11, GEQ U.G006.15, U.G018.19, 1610468, and RW/GEQ2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
214_2022_2880_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Supplementary file1 The list of thermochemical data calculated with different exchange-correlation functionals, conceptual DFT descriptors of the reactants, frontier molecular orbital diagrams of the uncatalyzed and LA-catalyzed DA reactions between 2,5-DMF and ethylene in solution (1,4-dioxane, chloroform, and acetonitrile), thermochemical data of the AlCl3 complexation reaction with solvent molecules and with the O atom of 2,5-DMF, as well as energies, enthalpies, free enthalpies and entropies of the reactants, products and TSs are given in the SI.pdf file. (PDF 1981 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chellegui, M., Champagne, B. & Trabelsi, M. Lewis acid-catalyzed Diels–Alder cycloaddition of 2,5-dimethylfuran and ethylene: a density functional theory investigation. Theor Chem Acc 141, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-022-02880-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-022-02880-y