Log in

Comparison of the effects of clozapine and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on progressive ratio schedule performance: evidence against the involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the behavioural effects of clozapine

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Performance on progressive ratio schedules has been proposed as a means of assessing the effects of drugs on the efficacy of reinforcers. A mathematical model (Killeen PR (1994) Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behav Brain Sci 17:105–172) affords a basis for quantifying the effects of drugs on progressive ratio schedule performance. The model postulates a bitonic function relating response rate and ratio size. One parameter of the function, a, expresses the motivational effect of the reinforcer, whereas another parameter, δ, expresses the minimum time needed to execute a response, and is regarded as an index of ‘motor capacity’. Previously we found that the atypical antipsychotic clozapine increased a, indicating an increase in reinforcer efficacy; a similar effect was observed with the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1A receptor agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). It has been suggested that some of clozapine’s behavioural effects are mediated by agonistic action at 5-HT1A receptors.

Objective

This study was conducted to compare the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT on progressive ratio schedule performance.

Methods

Rats were trained under a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule (50-min sessions). In experiment 1, they received acute doses of clozapine (4 mg kg−1) and 8-OH-DPAT (100 μg kg−1), alone and in combination with the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist N-[2-(4-[2-methoxyphenyl]-1-piperazinyl)ethyl]-N-2-yridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY-100635; 30 μg kg−1). In experiment 2, the effects of clozapine (2, 4 and 8 mg kg−1) and 8-OH-DPAT (25, 50 and 100 μg kg−1) were compared between intact rats and rats whose 5-HTergic pathways had been ablated by 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT).

Results

In both experiments, clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT increased a and δ. In experiment 1, WAY-100635 abolished the effect of 8-OH-DPAT on a and δ, but did not alter clozapine’s effects on these parameters. In experiment 2, the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT did not differ between sham-lesioned and 5,7-DHT-lesioned rats.

Conclusions

The results confirm previous findings on the effects of clozapine and 8-OH-DPAT on progressive ratio schedule performance. 8-OH-DPAT’s effects are probably mediated by post-synaptic 5-HT1A receptors; clozapine’s effects are mediated by a different mechanism, which does not appear to involve 5-HT1A receptors and which does not depend upon an intact 5-HTergic pathway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aberman JE, Ward SJ, Salamone JD (1998) Effects of dopamine antagonists and accumbens dopamine depletions on time-constrained progressive-ratio performance. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 61:341–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bantick RA, Deakin JFW, Grasby PM (2001) The 5-HT1A receptor in schizophrenia: a promising target for novel atypical neuroleptics? J Psychopharmacol 15:37–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes NM, Sharpe T (1999) A review of central 5-HT receptors and their function. Neuropharmacology 38:1083–1152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barr AM, Philips AG (1998) Withdrawal following repeated exposure to d-amphetamine decreases responding for a sucrose solution as measured by a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology 141:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bizo LA, Killeen PR (1997) Models of ratio schedule performance. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Processes 23:351–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blake T-J, Tillery CE, Reynolds GP (1998) Antipsychotic drug affinities at alpha2-adrenoceptor subtypes in post-mortem human brain. J Psychopharmacol 12:151–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Body S, Kheramin S, Mobini S, Ho M-Y, Velazquez-Martinez DN, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (2002) Antagonism by WAY-100635 of the effects of 8-OH-DPAT on performance on a free-operant timing schedule in intact and 5-HT-depleted rats. Behav Pharmacol 13:603–614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Body S, Kheramin S, Ho M-Y, Miranda Herrera F, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (2004) Effects of fenfluramine on free-operant timing behaviour: evidence for involvement of 5-HT2A receptors. Psychopharmacology 176:154–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheeta S, Brooks S, Willner P (1995) Effects of reinforcer sweetness and the D2/D3 antagonist raclopride on progressive ratio operant responding. Behav Pharmacol 6:127–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chou Y-H, Halldin C, Farde L (2003) Occupancy of 5-HT1A receptors by clozapine in the primate brain: a PET study. Psychopharmacology 166:234–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan PW, Reinke RR, Landsberger SA, Charate A, Toombs GA (2003) The effects of atypical antipsychotic medications on psychosocial outcomes. Schizophr Res 63:97–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dekeyne A, Rivet J-M, Gobert A, Millan MJ (2001) Generalization of serotonin (5-HT)1A agonists and the antipsychotics, clozapine, ziprasidone and S16924, but not haloperidol, to the discriminative stimuli elicited by PD128,907 and 7-OH-DPAT. Neuropharmacology 40:899–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Vry J (1995) 5-HT1A receptor agonists: recent developments and controversial issues. Psychopharmacology 121:1–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamill S, Trevitt JT, Nowend KL, Carlson BB, Salamone JD (1999) Nucleus accumbens dopamine depletion and time-constrained progressive ratio performance: effects of different ratio requirements. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 64:21–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel P, Fagerquist MV, Svensson TH (1999) Enhanced cortical dopamine output and antipsychotic-like effects of raclopride by α2 adrenoceptor blockade. Science 286:105–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho M-Y, Body S, Kheramin S, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (2003) Effects of 8-OH-DPAT and WAY-100635 on performance on a time-constrained progressive-ratio schedule. Psychopharmacology 167:137–144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodos W (1961) Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength. Science 134:943–944

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodos W, Kalman G (1963) Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. J Exp Anal Behav 6:389–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyer D, Hannon JP, Martin GR (2002) Molecular, pharmacological and functional diversity of 5-HT receptors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 71:533–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa J, Ishii H, Bonaccorsco S, Fowler WL, O’Laughlin IA, Meltzer HY (2001) 5-HT2A and D2 receptor blockade increases cortical DA release via 5-HT1A receptor activation: a possible mechanism of atypical antipsychotic-induced cortical dopamine release. J Neurochem 76:1521–1531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Imai H, Steindler DA, Kitai ST (1986) The organization of divergent axonal projections of the midbrain raphe nuclei in the rat. J Comp Neurol 243:363–380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kheramin S, Body S, Miranda Herrera F, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E, Deakin JFW, Anderson IM (2005) The effect of orbital prefrontal cortex lesions on performance on a progressive ratio schedule: implications for models of inter-temporal choice. Behav Brain Res 156:145–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Killeen PR (1994) Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behav Brain Sci 17:105–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killeen PR, Sitomer MT (2003) MPR. Behav Processes 62:49–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killeen PR, Cate H, Tran T (1993) Scaling pigeons’ choice of feeds: bigger is better. J Exp Anal Behav 60:203–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King DJ, Waddington JL (2004) Antipsychotic drugs and the treatment of schizophrenia. In: King DJ (ed) Seminars in psychopharmacology, 2nd edn. Gaskell, London, pp 316–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Leysen JE (2000) Receptor profiles of antipsychotics. In: Ellenbrook BA, Cools AR (eds) Atypical antipsychotics. Birkhauser, Basel, pp 57–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer HY (1999) The role of sertonin in antipsychotic drug action. Neuropsychopharmacology 21:106S–115S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer HY, Matsubara S, Lee J-C (1989) Classification of typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs on the basis of dopamine D-1, D-2 and serotonin-2 pK i values. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 251:238–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mobini S, Chiang T-J, Ho M-Y, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (2000) Comparison of the effects of clozapine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on performance on a time-constrained progressive ratio schedule and on locomotor behaviour in the rat. Psychopharmacology 152:47–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Spahn F (2002) Current use of atypical antipsychotics. Eur Psychiatr 17(suppl 4):377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman-Tancredi A, Gavaudan S, Conte C, Chaput C, Touzard M, Verriele L, Audinot V, Millan MJ (1998) Agonist and antagonist actions of antipsychotic agents at 5-HT1A receptors: a [35S]GTP S binding study. Eur J Pharmacol 355:245–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paxinos G, Watson C (1998) The brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 2nd edn. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinssen EPM, Kleven MS, Koek W (1999) Interactions between neuroleptics and 5-HT1A ligands in preclinical behavioral models for antipsychotic and extrapyramidal effects. Psychopharmacology 144:20–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly MP (2003) Extending mathematical principles of reinforcement into the domain of behavioral pharmacology. Behav Processes 62:75–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts DCS, Richardson NR (1992) Self-administration of psychostimulants using progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement. In: Boulton A, Baker G, Wu PH (eds) Neuromethods, vol 24: animal models of drug addiction. Humana, New York, pp 233–269

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rollema H, Lu Y, Schmidt AW (1997) Clozapine increases dopamine release in prefrontal cortex by 5-HT1A receptor activation. Eur J Pharmacol 338:R3–R5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skjoldager P, Pierre PJ, Mittleman G (1993) Reinforcer magnitude and progressive ratio responding in the rat: effects of increased effort, prefeeding, and extinction. Learn Motiv 24:303–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart WJ (1975) Progressive ratio reinforcement schedules: a review and evaluation. Aust J Psychol 27:9–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wogar MA, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (1992) Impaired acquisition of temporal differentiation performance following lesions of the ascending 5-hydroxytryptaminergic pathways. Psychopharmacology 107:373–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Young CD, Meltzer HY, Deutch AY (1998) Effects of desmethylclozapine on fos protein expression in the forebrain: in vivo biological activity of the clozapine metabolite. Neuropsychopharmacology 19:99–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Rickard JF, Asgari K, Body S, Bradshaw CM, Szabadi E (2005) Quantitative analysis of the effects of some ‘atypical’ and ‘conventional’ antipsychotics on progressive ratio schedule performance. Psychopharmacology, in press

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust (Travelling Fellowship awarded to Z.Z.). We are grateful to Ms.V. K. Bak and Mr. R. W. Langley for skilled technical help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Bradshaw.

Additional information

Jonathan Francis Rickard (1977–2003), a gifted and dedicated Ph.D. student, made a major contribution to this work

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Rickard, J.F., Body, S. et al. Comparison of the effects of clozapine and 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) on progressive ratio schedule performance: evidence against the involvement of 5-HT1A receptors in the behavioural effects of clozapine. Psychopharmacology 181, 381–391 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-2258-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-2258-7

Keywords

Navigation