Log in

Surgical therapies of female stress urinary incontinence: experience in 228 cases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) with Marshall–Marchetti–Krantz (MMK) procedure in stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment.

Methods

Two hundred twenty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. TVT procedure was performed in 105 cases, MMK procedure was performed in 81 cases, Chi-square test was used, and P < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The short-term success rate was about 89% in MMK group. However, the success rate fell to 68.2% at 5 years and 32% at 10 years. The short-term cure rate of TVT procedure was about 90.0%, and the 5-year cure rate was 84.3%.

Conclusions

The short-term cure rate in both groups was similar, but the long-term success rate of the MMK procedure decreased sharply with time. The TVT technique provides long-term cure rates of over 84% with minimal complications. Patients who underwent TVT experienced shorter operation time, less blood loss, and less hospital stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Brazil)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FUL:

Functional urethral length

MMK procedure:

Marshall–Marchetti–Krantz procedure

Qmax:

Maximal urinary flow rate

MUCP:

Maximal urethral closure pressure

SUI:

Stress urinary incontinence

TVT:

Tension-free vaginal tape

References

  1. Hunskaar S, Burgio K, Clark A (2005) Epidemiology of urinary and faecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapsed. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (eds) Incontinence: 3rd international consultation on incontinence. Health Publications, Plymouth, UK, pp 255–312

    Google Scholar 

  2. Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Shen H, Lin F, Wang TH, Vittinghoff E et al (2003) Stress urinary incontinence surgery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 101:671–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L (2003) Procedures for pelvic organ prolapse in the United States 1979–97. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Luber KM, Boero S, Choe JY (2001) The demographics of pelvic floor disorders: current observations and future projections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1496–1503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Petros P, Ulmsten U (1993) An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 153:1–93

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mainprize TC, Drutz HP (1988) The Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure: a critical review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 43:724–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee RA, Symmonds RE, Goldstein RA (1979) Surgical complications and results of modified Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure for urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 53:447–450

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jarvis GJ (1994) Surgery for genuine stress incontinence. BJOG 101:371–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Czaplicki M, Dobronski P, Torz C, Borkowski A (1998) Long-term subjective results of Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure. Eur Urol 34:118–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clemens JQ, Stern JA, Bushman WA, Schaeffer AJ (1998) Long term results of the Stamey bladder neck suspension: direct comparison with the Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz procedure. J Urol 160:372–376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Colombo M, Scalambrino S, Maggioni A, Milani R (1994) Burch colposuspension versus modified Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy for primary genuine stress urinary incontinence: a prospective, randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1573–1579

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nilsson CG (2004) Introduction of a new surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:877–880

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merlin T, Arnold E, Petros P, MacTaggart P, Tulloch A, Faulkner K et al (2001) A systematic review of tension-free urethropexy for stress urinary incontinence: intravaginal slingplasty and the tension-free vaginal tape procedures. BJU Int 88:871–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Petros P, Ulmsten U (1995) Intravaginal slingplasty: an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29:1–75

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nilsson CG, Kuuva N, Falconer C, Rezapour M, Ulmsten U (2001) Longterm results of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12(suppl 2):S5–S8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Atherton MJ, Stanton SL (2005) The tension-free vaginal tape reviewed: an evidence based review from inception to current status. BJOG 112:534–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lo TS (2004) Tension-free vaginal tape procedures in women with stress urinary incontinence with and without co-existing genital prolapsed. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 16:399–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Professor Zhou-jun Shen for providing technical assistance.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun-**ao Zhou.

Additional information

**-Yan Wu and Hong-Chao He are co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wu, JY., He, HC., Chen, SW. et al. Surgical therapies of female stress urinary incontinence: experience in 228 cases. Int Urogynecol J 21, 645–649 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1093-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1093-5

Keywords

Navigation