Abstract
Satellite-borne microwave radiometers provide wet tropospheric correction (WTC) for altimetry observations, which is critical to high-accuracy sea surface height (SSH) measurements. However, it was reported that the Haiyang-2A (HY-2A) calibration microwave radiometer (CMR) experienced abrupt 18.7 GHz band failure. The global navigation satellite system (GNSS) can provide (near) real-time accurate WTC with high temporal resolutions. In this study, GNSS observations of 132 global coastal sites from January 2017 to February 2018 are used for CMR validation and calibration. In addition, the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) products during the same period are also used for comparison. After calibration with GNSS observations, the root-mean-square (RMS) of the WTC differences between CMR and ECMWF decreases from 2.53 to 1.66 cm. After calibration with ECMWF products, the RMS of the WTC differences between ECMWF-calibrated CMR and ECMWF is 1.54 cm. Moreover, different processing strategies of WTC are applied to SSH measurements. The mean sea level anomaly (SLA) values of SSH obtained with ECMWF-calibrated CMR are comparable to those obtained with GNSS-calibrated CMR WTC and with ECMWF WTC. In addition, compared to the SLAs of Jason-3, the SLAs of HY-2A obtained with ECMWF WTC show the smallest differences of 7.79 cm in RMS, which are 0.1 cm smaller than those obtained with ECMWF-calibrated CMR WTC and 0.23 cm smaller than those obtained with GNSS-calibrated CMR WTC. The SLAs obtained with original CMR WTC are reduced by approximately 0.8 cm in RMS after using GNSS-calibrated CMR WTC. Therefore, even with the known limitations of ground-based GNSS (non-collocated measurements over land instead of over ocean), it can indeed serve as a valuable WTC source for radiometer calibration due to the lower latency of GNSS observations.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00190-022-01617-w/MediaObjects/190_2022_1617_Fig11_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Coastal GNSS original observations are available at http://cddis.nasa.gov/archive/gnss/data, VMF3 WTC data are available at http://vmf.geo.tuwien.ac.at, and the GNSS ZWD, VMF3 WTC and HY-2A CMR data in crossover points are available at http://igmas.users.sgg.whu.edu.cn/group/tool/11. The HY-2A dataset is also available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
References
Bao L, Gao P, Peng H, Jia Y, Shum C, Lin M, Guo Q (2015) First accuracy assessment of the HY-2A altimeter sea surface height observations: cross-calibration results. Adv Space Res 55:90–105
Beckley B, Callahan P, Hancock D III, Mitchum G, Ray R (2017) On the “Cal-Mode” correction to TOPEX satellite altimetry and its effect on the global mean sea level time series. J Geophys Res: Oceans 122:8371–8384. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013090
Bevis M, Businger S, Herring TA, Rocken C, Anthes RA, Ware RH (1992) GPS meteorology: remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using the global positioning system. J Geophys Res: Atmospheres 97:15787–15801. https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD01517
Biancamaria S et al (2018) Validation of Jason-3 tracking modes over French rivers. Remote Sens Environ 209:77–89
Böhm J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2007) Short note: a global model of pressure and temperature for geodetic applications. J Geodesy 81:679–683
Brown S (2013) Maintaining the long-term calibration of the Jason-2/OSTM advanced microwave radiometer through intersatellite calibration. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 51:1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2213262
Carrère L, Lyard F (2003) Modeling the barotropic response of the global ocean to atmospheric wind and pressure forcing-comparisons with observations. Geophys Res Lett 30:1275. https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016473
Cartwright D, Edden AC (1973) Corrected tables of tidal harmonics. Geophys J Int 33:253–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1973.tb03420.x
Cazenave A, Dieng H-B, Meyssignac B, Von Schuckmann K, Decharme B, Berthier E (2014) The rate of sea-level rise nature. Clim Change 4:358. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2159
Cui W, Wang W, Jie Z, Yang J, Jia Y (2018) Improvement of sea surface height measurements of HY-2A satellite altimeter using Jason-2. Mar Geodesy 41:632–648
Dee DP et al (2011) The ERA-Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system quarterly. J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.828
Desai SD, Haines BJ (2004) Monitoring measurements from the Jason-1 microwave radiometer and independent validation with GPS. Mar Geodesy 27:221–240
Gaspar P, Ogor F, Le Traon PY, Zanife OZ (1994) Estimating the sea state bias of the TOPEX and POSEIDON altimeters from crossover differences. J Geophys Res: Oceans 99:24981–24994. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JC01430
Gendt G, Dick G, Reigber C, Tomassini M, Liu Y, Ramatschi M (2004) Near real time GPS water vapor monitoring for numerical weather prediction in Germany. J Meteorol Soc Jpn Ser II(82):361–370. https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.2004.361
Haines BJ, Bar-Sever YE (1998) Monitoring the TOPEX microwave radiometer with GPS: Stability of columnar water vapor measurements. Geophys Res Lett 25:3563–3566
Jiang X, Lin M, Liu J, Zhang Y, **e X, Peng H, Zhou W (2012) The HY-2 satellite and its preliminary assessment. Int J Digital Earth 5:266–281
Keihm SJ, Janssen MA, Ruf CS (1995) TOPEX/Poseidon microwave radiometer (TMR). III wet troposphere range correction algorithm and pre-launch error budget. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 33:147–161. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.368213
Kouba J (2008) Implementation and testing of the gridded Vienna Map** Function 1 (VMF1). J Geodesy 82:193–205
Labroue S, Gaspar P, Dorandeu J, Zanife O, Mertz F, Vincent P, Choquet D (2004) Nonparametric estimates of the sea state bias for the Jason-1 radar altimeter. Mar Geodesy 27:453–481
Landskron D, Böhm J (2018) VMF3/GPT3: refined discrete and empirical troposphere map** functions. J Geodesy 92:349–360
Landskron D, Böhm J, Klügel T, Schüler T (2019) Comparing atmospheric data and models at station Wettzell during CONT17. Adv Geosci 50:1–7
Li X et al (2015) Retrieving of atmospheric parameters from multi-GNSS in real time: validation with water vapor radiometer and numerical weather model. J Geophys Res: Atmospheres 120:7189–7204
Li X, Tan H, Li X, Dick G, Wickert J, Schuh H (2018) Real-time sensing of precipitable water vapor from BeiDou observations: Hong Kong and CMONOC networks. J Geophys Res: Atmospheres 123:7897–7909
Liu LY, Chen G, Wu Z (2019) Evaluation of HY-2A satellite-borne water vapor radiometer with shipborne GPS and GLONASS observations over the Indian Ocean. GPS Solut 23:87
Maiwald F et al (2016) Reliable and stable radiometers for Jason-3. IEEE J Select Topics Appl Earth Observ Remote Sens 9:2754–2762
NSOAS (2011) HY-2A Calibration Microwave Radiometer Data User's Handbook 2011[EB/OL][2012–05]
Obligis E, Rahmani A, Eymard L, Labroue S, Bronner E (2009) An improved retrieval algorithm for water vapor retrieval: application to the envisat microwave radiometer. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47:3057–3064. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2009.2020433
Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS Conventions (2010) IERS Tech Note 36. Verlag des Bundesamtes für Geodäsie und Kartographie, Frankfurt am Main
Ray RD (2013) Precise comparisons of bottom-pressure and altimetric ocean tides. J Geophys Res: Oceans 118:4570–4584
Ray RD (1999) A global ocean tide model from TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry: GOT99. 2. In: NASA Technical Memo. 209478. Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, p 58
Ruf CS (2002) Characterization and correction of a drift in calibration of the TOPEX microwave radiometer. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 40:509–511. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.992824
Saastamoinen J (1972) Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging satellites. Artif Satellites Geodesy 15:247–251. https://doi.org/10.1029/GM015p0247
Schaeffer P, Pujol M, Faugère Y, Picot N, Guillot A (2016) New mean sea surface CNES_CLS 2015 focusing on the use of geodetic missions of Cryosat-2 and Jason-1. In: OSTST 2016 meeting, La Rochelle, France
Sibthorpe A, Brown S, Desai SD, Haines BJ (2011) Calibration and validation of the Jason-2/OSTM advanced microwave radiometer using terrestrial GPS stations. Mar Geodesy 34:420–430
Vieira T, Fernandes MJ, Lázaro C (2018) Independent assessment of on-board microwave radiometer measurements in coastal zones using tropospheric delays from gnss. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 57:1804–1816. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2869258
Wahr JM (1985) Deformation induced by polar motion. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 90:9363–9368. https://doi.org/10.1029/JB090iB11p09363
Wang J, Zhang J, Fan C, Wang J (2014) Validation of the “HY-2” altimeter wet tropospheric path delay correction based on radiosonde data. Acta Oceanol Sin 33:48–53
Wang J et al (2019) Retrieving precipitable water vapor from shipborne multi-GNSS observations. Geophys Res Lett 46:5000–5008. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082136
Wang, ZD (2008) Simulation on retrieving of atmospheric wet path delay by microwave radiometer on HY-2 satellite. In: Microwave Conference, 2008 China-Japan Joint, 2008. IEEE, pp 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1109/CJMW.2008.4772517
Wu J-T, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscr Geodaet 18:91–98
Wu Z, Wang J, Liu Y, He X, Liu Y, Xu W (2019) Validation of 7 years in-flight HY-2A calibration microwave radiometer products using numerical weather model and radiosondes. Remote Sens 11:1616. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11131616
Wu Z, Liu Y, Liu Y, Wang J, He X, Xu W, Ge M (2021) Calibrating the Haiyang-2A calibration microwave radiometer when the 18.7-GHz band fails. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3073278
Yang L, Zhou X, Lin M, Lei N, Mu B, Zhu L (2016) Global statistical assessment of HY-2A altimeter IGDR data. Progr Geophys 31:629–636
Zhang D, Wang Z, Li Y, Zhao J, Liu Y (2015) Preliminary analysis of HY-2 ACMR data. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2015 IEEE International, Milan, Italy, 2015. IEEE, pp 177–180. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7325728
Zhao J, Zhang D, Wang Z, Li Y (2016) The validation of HY-2A ACMR retrieval algorithms and product. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2016 IEEE International, Bei**g, China, 2016. IEEE, pp 411–413
Zheng G, Yang J, Ren L, Zhou W, Huang L (2014) The preliminary cross-calibration of the HY-2A calibration microwave radiometer with the Jason-1/2 microwave radiometers. Int J Remote Sens 35:4515–4531
Zhu L, Yang L, Xu Y, Zhang H, Wu Z, Wang Z (2021) Independent validation of Jason-2/3 and HY-2B microwave radiometers using chinese coastal GNSS. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2021.3106650
Zumberge J, Heflin M, Jefferson D, Watkins M, Webb FH (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth 102:5005–5017. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB03860
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank NSOAS for providing the HY-2A data, TU Wien for providing the VMF3 grid data, IGS for providing the GNSS observations and GFZ for providing the precise orbit and clock products. Dynamic atmospheric corrections are produced by CLS using the Mog2D model from Legos and distributed by Aviso+, MSS_CNES_CLS15 is produced by CLS and distributed by Aviso+ with support from CNES, and Jason-3 GDR is distributed by Aviso+ with support from CNES. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41876106, 41974029 and 42004030), the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFC3000504 and 2020YFB0505805), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2042021kf0005), Wenhai Program of Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (2021WHZZB1002) and the Fellowship of China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M682481). The numerical calculations in this paper have been done on the supercomputing system in the Supercomputing Center of Wuhan University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.W., YX.L. and Y.L. provided the initial idea and designed the experiments for this study; Z.W., YX.L., Y.L., C. L. and X. H. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; K. J., W. X. helped with the writing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, Z., Liu, Y., Liu, Y. et al. Rapid calibration of HY-2A satellite-borne microwave radiometer using coastal GNSS observations. J Geod 96, 24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01617-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01617-w