Log in

Surface properties of molds for powder injection molding and their effect on feedstock moldability and mold adhesion

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The surface energy of various mold materials for low-pressure powder injection molding was evaluated using values of contact angles (Owens–Wendt method), and correlated with the feedstock moldability and mold adhesion. The surface tension of the binder used to formulate a metallic-based feedstock was also measured in the molten state at a typical injection temperature using the pendant drop technique. Real-scale injection tests were performed into metallic and polymeric mold cavities to assess the feedstock moldability and its adhesion with the mold surfaces that were compared with theoretical predictions obtained from the surface energies values. The results confirmed that the adhesion was significantly affected by the interfacial energy between the mold and the binder—in this case, the metallic mold exhibited low adhesion as compared to the polymeric mold. It was finally demonstrated that the adhesion phenomenon is only related to the surface properties of the mold (i.e., they are not related to the solidification rate)—in this case, a gold-coated polymeric mold produced the moldability of a polymeric mold and the adhesion properties of a metallic mold, which translated into a high moldability potential, with no resulting adhesion of the feedstock with the mold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. González-Gutiérrez J, Stringari GB, Emri I (2012) Powder injection molding of metal and ceramic parts. INTECH Open Access Publisher. https://doi.org/10.5772/38070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Saha B, Toh WQ, Liu E, Tor SB, Hardt DE, Lee J (2015) A review on the importance of surface coating of micro/nano-mold in micro/nano-molding processes. J Micromech Microeng 26(1):013002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/26/1/013002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Momeni V, Hufnagl M, Shahroodi Z, Gonzalez-Gutierrez J, Schuschnigg S, Kukla C, Holzer C (2023) Research progress on low-pressure powder injection molding. Materials 16(1):379. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. German RM (2008) PIM breaks the $1 bn barrier. Met Powder Rep 63:8–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0657(08)70036-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ruprecht R, Gietzelt T, Müler K, Piotter V, Haußelt J (2002) Injection molding of microstructured components from plastics, metals and ceramics. Microsyst Technol 8:351–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542-001-0153-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kafkas F, Ebel T (2014) Metallurgical and mechanical properties of Ti–24Nb–4Zr–8Sn alloy fabricated by metal injection molding. J Alloys Compd 617:359–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.07.168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ozgun O, Gulsoy HO, Yilmaz R, Findik F (2013) Microstructural and mechanical characterization of injection molded 718 superalloy powders. J Alloys Compd 576:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.04.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Özgün Ö, Yılmaz R, Özkan Gülsoy H, Fındık F (2015) The effect of aging treatment on the fracture toughness and impact strength of injection molded Ni-625 superalloy parts. Mater Charact 108:8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2015.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raza MR, Ahmad F, Muhamad N, Sulong AB, Omar MA, Akhtar MN, Aslam M (2016) Effects of solid loading and cooling rate on the mechanical properties and corrosion behavior of powder injection molded 316 L stainless steel. Powder Technol 289:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.11.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Demers V, Fareh F, Turenne S, Demarquette NR, Scalzo O (2018) Experimental study on moldability and segregation of Inconel 718 feedstocks used in low-pressure powder injection molding. Adv Powder Technol 29:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2017.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thavanayagam G, Pickering KL, Swan JE, Cao P (2015) Analysis of rheological behaviour of titanium feedstocks formulated with a water-soluble binder system for powder injection moulding. Powder Technol 269:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2014.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Demers V, Turenne S, Scalzo O (2015) Impact of binders on viscosity of low-pressure powder injection molded Inconel 718 superalloy. J Mater Sci 50:2893–2902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2017.10.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fareh F, Demers V, Demarquette NR, Turenne S, Scalzo O (2016) Molding properties of Inconel 718 feedstocks used in low-pressure powder injection molding. Adv Mater Sci Eng 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7078045

  14. Li Y-M, Huang B-Y, Qu X-H (1999) Viscosity and melt rheology of metal injection moulding feedstocks. Powder Metall 42:86–90. https://doi.org/10.1179/pom.1999.42.1.86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Heaney DF (2019) Handbook of metal injection molding. Woodhead Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hausnerova B (2017) Binder systems for powder injection molding: a review. Adv Mater Proc 2(12):761–768. https://doi.org/10.5185/amp.2017/873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kurusu RS, Demarquette NR (2018) Surface modification to control the water wettability of electrospun mats. Intern Mater Rev 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09506608.2018.1484577

  18. Babaei S, Girard-Lauriault PL (2016) Tuning the surface properties of oxygen-rich and nitrogen-rich plasma polymers: functional groups and surface charge. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 36:651–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-015-9682-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kietzig AM, Negar Mirvakili M, Kamal S, Englezos P, Hatzikiriakos SG (2011) Laser-patterned super-hydrophobic pure metallic substrates: Cassie to Wenzel wetting transitions. J Adhes Sci Technol 25(20):2789–2809. https://doi.org/10.1163/016942410X549988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ling EJY, Uong V, Renault-Crispo JS, Kietzig AM, Servio P (2016) Reducing ice adhesion on nonsmooth metallic surfaces: wettability and topography effects. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8(13):8789–8800. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b00187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Genna S, Giannini O, Guarino S, Ponticelli GS, Tagliaferri F (2020) Laser texturing of AISI 304 stainless steel: experimental analysis and genetic algorithm optimisation to control the surface wettability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 110:3005–3022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06073-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen Z, Yang J, Liu H, Zhao Y, Pan R (2022) A short review on functionalized metallic surfaces by ultrafast laser micromachining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 119(11–12):6919–6948. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-08560-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sappati KK, Rout B, Girard-Lauriault PL, Bhadra S (2020) Plasma treatment of composite piezoelectric thin films for good adhesion of printed conductive ink. ACS Appl Polym Mater 3(1):319–328. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.0c01117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hemrick JG, Starr TL, Rosen DW (2001) Release behavior for powder injection molding in stereolithography molds. Rapid Prototyp J 7(2):115–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540110386772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Aho J, Boetker J, Baldursdottir S, Rantanen J (2015) Rheology as a tool for evaluation of melt processability of innovative dosage forms. Intern J Pharm 494:623–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hausnerova B, Bleyan D, Kasparkova V, Pata V (2016) Surface adhesion between ceramic injection molding feedstocks and processing tools. Ceram Int 42(1):460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Żenkiewicz M (2007) Methods for the calculation of surface free energy of solids. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 24:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yuan Y, Lee TR (2013) Contact angle and wetting properties, Surface science techniques. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  29. Owens DK, Wendt R (1969) Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 13:1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1969.070130815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Daerr A, Mogne A (2016) Pendent drop: an imagej plugin to measure the surface tension from an image of a pendent drop. J Open Res Softw 4:1. https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mary B, Dubois C, Carreau PJ, Brousseau P (2006) Rheological properties of suspensions of polyethylene-coated aluminum nanoparticles. Rheol Acta 45:561–573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-006-0095-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Majewska-Glabus I, Zhuang L, Vetter R, Duszczyk J (1995) Thermal debinding of Fe3Al-X metal powder compacts. J Mater Sci 30:6209–6217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leverkoehne M, Coronel-Hernandez J, Dirscherl R, Gorlov I, Janssen R, Claussen N (2001) Novel binder system based on paraffin-wax for low-pressure injection molding of metal-ceramic powder mixtures. Adv Eng Mater 3:995–998. https://doi.org/10.1002/1527-2648(200112)3:12%3c995::AID-ADEM995%3e3.0.CO;2-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ahn S, Park SJ, Lee S, Atre SV, German RM (2009) Effect of powders and binders on material properties and molding parameters in iron and stainless steel powder injection molding process. Powder Technol 193:162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) (2009) Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay). New York. Standard No. B46.1, 2009

  36. Kurusu RS, Demarquette NR (2017) Surface properties evolution in electrospun polymer blends by segregation of hydrophilic or amphiphilic molecules. Eur Polym J 89:129–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Peet MJ, Hasan HS, Bhadeshia HKDH (2011) Prediction of thermal conductivity of steel. Intern J Heat Mass Transf 54:2602–2608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.01.025

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Price DM, Jarratt M (2002) Thermal conductivity of PTFE and PTFE composites. Thermochim Acta 392–393:231–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6031(02)00105-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Callies M, Quéré D (2005) On water repellency. Soft Matter 1:55–61. https://doi.org/10.1039/B501657F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Packham DE (2003) Surface energy, surface topography and adhesion. Intern J Adhes Adhes 23:437–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7496(03)00068-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hwang DS, Zeng H, Srivastava A, Krogstad DV, Tirrell M, Israelachvili JN, Waite JH (2010) Viscosity and interfacial properties in a mussel-inspired adhesive coacervate. Soft Matter 6:3232–3236. https://doi.org/10.1039/C002632H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Priftis D, Farina R, Tirrell M (2012) Interfacial energy of polypeptide complex coacervates measured via capillary adhesion. Langmuir 28:8721–8729. https://doi.org/10.1021/la300769d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Das S, Lahiri D, Lee D-Y, Agarwal A, Choi W (2013) Measurements of the adhesion energy of graphene to metallic substrates. Carbon 59:121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kurusu R, Gholami M, Demarquette N R, Demers V, Ouarab L (2022) Mold for metal injection molding. US Patent Application (63/287,186)

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) under Grant #EGP2 513741 – 17.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and data collection were performed by R. S. Kurusu and M. Gholami, while analysis were performed by R. S. Kurusu. The first draft of the manuscript was written by R. S. Kurusu and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Demers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurusu, R.S., Gholami, M., Demarquette, N.R. et al. Surface properties of molds for powder injection molding and their effect on feedstock moldability and mold adhesion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 126, 381–390 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11148-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-023-11148-z

Keywords

Navigation