Log in

Tool wear in ultrasonic vibration–assisted drilling of CFRP: a comparison with conventional drilling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRPs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in the industries including automobile, aerospace, and military due to their light quality, high specific strength, high corrosion resistance, excellent thermodynamics performance, etc. However, these excellent properties easily result in intensive tool wear, short tool life, and reduced machining accuracy. Although ultrasonic vibration–assisted drilling (UVAD) was considered an effective drilling method to reduce tool wear, most reported studies focused on machining kinematics or mechanics, and very few studies systematically explored the tool wear behaviors in UVAD of CFRP. To fill this gap, this paper aims to investigate tool wear of high-speed steel (HSS) twist drill in UVAD of CFRP and compares these wear behaviors with those in conventional drilling based on the experimental observation of the worn drill morphologies. The effects of cutting parameters on tool wear were discussed with the special focus on the differences in tool wear between conventional drilling (CD) and UVAD. The observed wear behaviors can include abrasion, adhesion, oxidization, or the combination of them. The introduction of UVAD can effectively reduce the average width of tool flank wear with a maximum reduction of 13.0% when compared with CD. Both increased feed rate and decreased spindle speed can lead to decreased tool wear. The findings in this paper might offer guidance on the selection of cutting parameters for extending tool life in UVAD of CFRP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krishnaraj V, Prabukarthi A, Ramanathan A, Elanghovan N, Kumar MS, Zitoune R, Davim JP (2012) Optimization of machining parameters at high speed drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) laminates. Composites Part B 43(4):1791–1799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alessandra C (2018) Machining of fibre reinforced plastic composite materials. Materials 11(3):442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gara S, Fredj R, Naimi S, Tsoumarev O (2017) Prediction of cutting forces in slotting of multidirectional CFRP laminate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:3379–3391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9161-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Uriya Y, Yanagimoto J (2016) Suitable structure of thermosetting CFRP sheet for cold/warm forming. Int J Mater Form 9(2):243–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Che D, Saxena I, Han P, Guo P, Ehmann KF (2014) Machining of carbon fiber reinforced plastics/polymers: a literature review. J Manuf Sci Eng 136(3):034001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ameur MF, Habak M, Kenane M, Aouici H, Cheikh M (2017) Machinability analysis of dry drilling of carbon/epoxy composites: cases of exit delamination and cylindricity error. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 88(9-12):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raj DS, Karunamoorthy L (2016) Study of the effect of tool wear on hole quality in drilling CFRP to select a suitable drill for multi-criteria hole quality. Mater Manuf Process 31(5):587–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2015.1004713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karpat Y, Değer B, Bahtiyar O (2014) Experimental evaluation of polycrystalline diamond tool geometries while drilling carbon fiber-reinforced plastics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(5-8):1295–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5592-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gaugel S, Sripathy P, Haeger A, Meinhard D, Bernthaler T, Lissek F, Kaufeld M, Knoblauch V, Schneider G (2016) A comparative study on tool wear and laminate damage in drilling of carbon-fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP). Compos Struct 155:173–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park KH, Beal A, Kim D, Kwon P, Lantrip J (2011) Tool wear in drilling of composite/titanium stacks using carbide and polycrystalline diamond tools. Wear 271(11):2826–2835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rawat S, Attia H (2009) Wear mechanisms and tool life management of WC–Co drills during dry high speed drilling of woven carbon fibre composites. Wear 267(5-8):1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2009.01.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernández-Pérez J, Diaz-Alvarez J, Miguelez MH, Cantero JL (2020) Combined analysis of wear mechanisms and delamination in CFRP drilling. Compos Struct 255:112774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris M, Qureshi MAM, Saleem MQ, Khan SA, Bhutta MMA (2017) Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composite drilling via aluminum chromium nitride-coated tools: Hole quality and tool wear assessment. J Reinf Plast Compos 36(19):1403–1420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684417709359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernández-Pérez J, Cantero JL, Díaz-Álvarez J, Miguélez MH (2017) Influence of cutting parameters on tool wear and hole quality in composite aerospace components drilling. Compos Struct 178:157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iliescu D, Gehin D, Gutierrez ME, Girot F (2010) Modeling and tool wear in drilling of CFRP. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(2):204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xu J, Li C, Chen M, Ren F (2019) A comparison between vibration assisted and conventional drilling of CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks. Mater Manuf Process 34(10):1182–1193. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2019.1615085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li C, Xu J, Chen M, An Q, El Mansori M, Ren F (2019) Tool wear processes in low frequency vibration assisted drilling of CFRP/Ti6Al4V stacks with forced air-cooling. Wear 426-427:1616–1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Geng D, Zhang D, Xu Y, He F, Liu F (2014) Comparison of drill wear mechanism between rotary ultrasonic elliptical machining and conventional drilling of CFRP. J Reinf Plast Compos 33(9):797–809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Feng Q, Cong WL, Pei ZJ, Ren CZ (2012) Rotary ultrasonic machining of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer: feasibility study. Mach Sci Technol 16(3):380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2012.698962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shan C, Zhang X, Dang J, Yang Y (2017) Rotary ultrasonic drilling of needle-punched carbon/carbon composites: comparisons with conventional twist drilling and high-speed drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 98(1-4):189–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1228-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Makhdum F, Phadnis VA, Roy A, Silberschmidt VV (2014) Effect of ultrasonically-assisted drilling on carbon-fibre-reinforced plastics. J Sound Vib 333(23):5939–5952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2014.05.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu CQ, Gao GL, Li HN, Luo H (2019) Effects of machining conditions on the hole wall delamination in both conventional and ultrasonic-assisted CFRP drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 104:2301–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Faraz A, Biermann D, Weinert K (2009) Cutting edge rounding: an innovative tool wear criterion in drilling CFRP composite laminates. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(15):1185–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2009.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Madhavan V, Lipczynski G, Lane BM, Whitenton EP (2015) Fiber orientation angle effects in machining of unidirectional CFRP laminated composites. J Manuf Process 20:431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramirez C, Poulachon G, Rossi F, Msaoubi R (2014) Tool wear monitoring and hole surface quality during CFRP drilling. Procedia CIRP 13:163–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang X, Kwon PY, Sturtevant C, Kim D, Lantrip J (2013) Tool wear of coated drills in drilling CFRP. J Manuf Process 15(1):127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2012.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Celik A, Lazoglu I, Kara A, Kara F (2015) Wear on SiAlON ceramic tools in drilling of aerospace grade CFRP composites. Wear 338:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu D, Tang Y, Cong WL (2012) A review of mechanical drilling for composite laminates. Compos Struct 94(4):1265–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Henerichs M, Vos R, Harsch D, Kuster F, Wegener K (2014) Tool life time extension with nano-crystalline diamond coatings for drilling carbon-fibre reinforced plastics (CFRP). Procedia CIRP 24:125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Romoli L, Lutey AHA (2019) Quality monitoring and control for drilling of CFRP laminates. J Manuf Process 40:16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.02.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Matsumura T, Tamura S (2016) Temperature analysis in CFRP drilling. AIP Conference Proceedings 1769(1):080005. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4963480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu Z, He B, Chen J (2020) Evaluation of tool temperature distribution in MQL drilling of aluminum 2024-T351. J Manuf Process 56(1):757–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karpat YI, Değer B, Bahtiyar O (2012) Drilling thick fabric woven CFRP laminates with double point angle drills. J Mater Process Technol 212(10):2117–2127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Merino-Perez JL, Merson E, Ayvar-Soberanis S, Hodzic A (2014) The applicability of Taylor’s Model to the drilling of CFRP using uncoated WC-Co tools: the influence of cutting speed on tool wear. Int J Mach Mach Mater 16(2):95–112

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Availability of data and material

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article and its additional files.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

The work described in this paper is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No: 2020-YB-025) and State Key Lab of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology (Grant No: DMETKF2020026).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Wenjian Huang: writing-original draft preparation, methodology. Shiyu Cao: investigation, formal analysis, resources. Hao Nan Li: investigation, reviewing and editing. Qi Zhou: investigation, validation. Chaoqun Wu: reviewing and editing, funding acquisition, conceptualization, supervision. Dahu Zhu: investigation, data curation. Kejia Zhuang: reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chaoqun Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, W., Cao, S., Li, H.N. et al. Tool wear in ultrasonic vibration–assisted drilling of CFRP: a comparison with conventional drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115, 1809–1820 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07198-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07198-w

Keywords

Navigation