Log in

Modeling and experimental investigation of Cartesian compliance characterization for drilling robot

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial robot due to its high flexibility and low cost is wildly used in many areas. However, the low stiffness properties are the main limitation to the application of industrial robots in the field of precision machining. This paper addresses a modeling method of the Cartesian compliance for a drilling robot. The stiffness characterization in the drilling axial direction is analyzed, and the diversity of the axial stiffness in different robot postures is investigated. Based on the Cartesian compliance model, a quantitative evaluation index of the robot drilling performance is defined. Finally, experiments were developed on KUKA KR500-2 robot to validate the correctness of the model proposed, and specific conclusions regarding the robot compliance characterization are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Federation of Robotics (2013) World Robotics 2012, Statistical Yearbook

  2. Schneider U, Drust M, Ansaloni M, Lehmann C, Pellicciari M, Leali F, Gunnink JW, Verl A (2016) Improving robotic machining accuracy through experimental error investigation and modular compensation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Choi, S. Min, D. A. Dornfeld, M. Alam and T. Tzong (2003) Modeling of inter-layer gap formation in drilling of a multi-layered material. In: Proc. 6th CIRP Workshop on Modeling of Machining, McMaster University, Hamilton, pp.36–41

  4. Abele E, Weigold M, Rothenbucher S (2007) Modeling and identification of an industrial robot for machining applications. Annals of the CIRP 1(56):387–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen S-F, Kao I (2000) Conservative congruence transformation for joint and Cartesian stiffness matrices of robot hands and figures. The International Journal of Robotics Research 9(19):835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dumas C, Caro S, Garnier S, Furet B (2011) Joint stiffness identification of six-revolute industrial serial robots. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27:881–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumas C, Caro S, Garnier S, Furet B (2012) Joint stiffness identification of industrial serial robots. Robotica 4(30):649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pan Z, Zhang H, Zhu Z, Wang J (2006) Chatter analysis of robotic machining process. J Mater Process Technol 173:301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mejri S, Gagnol V, Le T-P, Sabourin L, Ray P, Paultre P (2016) Dynamic characterization of machining robot and stability analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82:351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Abele E, Schutzer K, Pischan M (2012) Tool path adaption based on optical measurement data for milling with industrial robot. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 6:459–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vosniakos G-C, Matsas E (2010) Improving feasibility of robotic milling through robot placement optimization. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 26:517–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Slamani M, Gauthier S, Chatelain J-F (2015) A study of the combined effects of machining parameters on cutting force components during high speed robotic trimming of CFRPs. Measurement 59:268–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zaeh MF, Roesch O (2014) Improvement of the machining accuracy of milling robots. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 8:737–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofener M, Schuppstuhl T (2014) A method for increasing the accuracy of “on-workpiece” machining with small industrial robots for composite repair. Prod Eng Res Devel 8:701–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klimchik A, Furet B, Caro S, Pashkevich A (2015) Identification of the manipulators stiffness model parameters in industrial environment. Mech Mach Theory 90:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. DeVlieg R, Sitton K, Feikert E and Inman J (2002) ONCE (one sided cell end effector) robotic drilling system. In: SAE 2002 Automated Fastening Conference & Exposition, Chester, ENGLA. SAE Technical Papers 2002–01-2626

  17. Liang J (2013) The formation and effect of interlayer gap in dry drilling of stacked metal materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:1263–1272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guo Y, Dong H, Ke Y (2015) Stiffness-oriented posture optimization in robotic machining applications. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 35:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yin B, TianWei LWH, Hu J, **n S (2015) Investigation of correlation between interlayer gap and burr height in drilling of stacked Al-7475 materials. Proc IMechE Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. doi:10.1177/0954405415617671

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yoshikawa T (1990) Foundations of robotics-analysis and control. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England

    Google Scholar 

  21. K S. ARUN, T. S. HUANG and S. D. BLOSTEIN (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-D point sets. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence:698–700

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yin BU or Wei TIAN.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the Chinese Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. NS2015052).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

BU, Y., LIAO, W., TIAN, W. et al. Modeling and experimental investigation of Cartesian compliance characterization for drilling robot. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 3253–3264 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-9991-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-9991-z

Keywords

Navigation