Zusammenfassung
Voraussetzung für die therapeutische Anwendung der tiefen Hirnstimulation (THS) ist eine stereotaktisch-neurochirurgische Operation mit Implantation von Hirnelektroden in subkortikale Zielstrukturen des Gehirns und Verbindung dieser Elektroden mit einem subkutan implantierten Impulsgeber. Während der vergangenen 10–15 Jahre wurden dafür bestimmte Minimalanforderungen an technische Ausstattung und prozedurale Vorgehensweisen formuliert, die teilweise über systematische Untersuchungen auch quantitativ abgesichert sind. Nur durch richtiges Patientenmanagement, einen hohen technischen Aufwand sowie eine geeignete Operationstechnik können Komplikationen, die als unmittelbare Folge des durchgeführten Eingriffs zu sehen sind, auf ein Minimum reduziert werden. Hochauflösende Bildgebung ist die Basis für Zielpunktbestimmung, Zugangsplanung und Lagekontrolle der implantierten Hirnelektroden bzw. dient postoperativ dem Ausschluss einer iatrogenen intrazerebralen Blutung. Die Qualität der Operationsplanung hängt zusätzlich in hohem Maß von den Möglichkeiten der Bildbearbeitung und -betrachtung ab, die eine spezifisch dafür entwickelte Planungssoftware zulässt. Weitere Bereiche, für die Standards definiert wurden, betreffen die intraoperativ durchzuführenden elektrophysiologischen und klinischen Untersuchungen sowie allgemeine chirurgische Maßnahmen, die bei der Implantation der THS-Stimulationssysteme zu beachten sind. Diese Übersichtsarbeit beschreibt und bewertet unter Berücksichtigung der Fachliteratur die Anforderungen, die an die genannten Systemkomponenten und Arbeitsschritte zu stellen sind.
Summary
Surgery combining stereotactically guided implantation of brain electrodes in subcortical key structures of the brain with the connection of these brain electrodes to subcutaneously implanted impulse generators is one precondition for the therapeutic application of deep brain stimulation (DBS). During the last 10–15 years minimal requirements concerning this surgery have been formulated, addressing in particular technical equipment and operational procedures and being also in parts supported quantitatively by systematic investigations. Only appropriate patient management, high technical standards and an adequate surgical technique can minimize the frequency of those complications, which are supposed to be directly caused by surgery. High-resolution imaging is the basis for target definition, determination of the surgical approach, documentation of final electrode position and postoperative exclusion of iatrogenic intracerebral haemorrhage. In addition, the quality of treatment planning depends largely on the image processing and viewing possibilities provided by specific planning software. Further issues, for which standards are defined, address electrophysiological and clinical examinations to be performed intraoperatively and general surgical measures, which should be considered during implantation of DBS systems. This review summarizes and evaluates requirements imposed on the aforementioned system components and working steps, taking into consideration data from the literature.
Literatur
Bjartmarz H, Rehncrona S (2007) Comparison of accuracy and precision between frame-based and frameless stereotactic navigation for deep brain stimulation electrode implantation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 85:235–242
Burchiel KJ, Nguyen TT, Coombs BD, Szumoski J (1996) MRI distortion and stereotactic neurosurgery using the Cosman-Roberts-Wells and Leksell frames. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66:123–136
Ende G, Treuer H, Boesecke R (1992) Optimization and evaluation of landmark-based image correlation. Phys Med Biol 37:261–271
Hunsche S, Sauner D, Maarouf M et al (2004) MR-guided stereotactic neurosurgery – comparison of fiducial-based and anatomical landmark transformation approaches. Phys Med Biol 49:2705–2716
Schuurman PR, de Bie RM, Majoie CB et al (1999) A prospective comparison between three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and ventriculography for target-coordinate determination in frame-based functional stereotactic neurosurgery. J Neurosurg 91:911–9114
Schlaier J, Herzog P, Schoedel P et al (2006) Relevance of correction for rotational targeting error in functional neurosurgery. Comput Aided Surg 11:37–42
Zonenshayn M, Rezai AR, Mogilner AY et al (2000) Comparison of anatomic and neurophysiological methods for subthalamic nucleus targeting. Neurosurgery 47:282–329
Richter EO, Hoque T, Halliday W et al (2004) Determining the position and size of the subthalamic nucleus based on magnetic resonance imaging results in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosurg 100:541–546
Andrade-Souza YM, Schwalb JM, Hamani C et al (2005) Comparison of 2-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging and 3-planar reconstruction methods for targeting the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson disease. Surg Neurol 63:357–362
Patel NK, Khan S, Gill SS (2008) Comparison of atlas- and magnetic-resonance-imaging-based stereotactic targeting of the subthalamic nucleus in the surgical treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86:153–161
Vayssiere N, Hemm S, Cif L et al (2002) Comparison of atlas- and magnetic resonance imaging-based stereotactic targeting of the globus pallidus internus in the performance of deep brain stimulation for treatment of dystonia. J Neurosurg 96:673–679
Starr PA, Vitek JL, DeLong M, Bakay RA (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging based stereotactic localization of the globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus. Neurosurgery 44:303–314
Pinsker MO, Volkmann J, Falk D et al (2008) Electrode implantation for deep brain stimulation in dystonia: a fast spin-echo inversion-recovery sequence technique for direct stereotactic targeting of the GPI. Zentralbl Neurochir 69:71–75
Steigerwald F, Hinz L, Pinsker MO et al (2005) Effect of propofol anesthesia on pallidal neuronal discharges in generalized dystonia. Neurosci Lett 386:156–159
Hertel F, Züchner M, Weimar I et al (2006) Implantation of electrodes for deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease with the aid of intraoperative microrecording under general anesthesia. Neurosurgery 59:E1138
Hariz MI, Fodstad H (1999) Do microelectrode techniques increase accuracy or decrease risks in pallidotomy and deep brain stimulation? A critical review of the literature. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 72:157–169
Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease Study Group (2001) Deep-brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus or the pars interna of the globus pallidus in Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 345:956–963
Hariz MI (2002) Safety and risk of microelectrode recording in surgery for movement disorders. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 78:146–157
Palur RS, Berk C, Schulzer M, Honey CR (2002) A metaanalysis comparing the results of pallidotomy performed using microelectrode recording or macroelectrode stimulation. J Neurosurg 96:1058–1062
Hamani C, Richter EO, Andrade-Souza Y et al (2005) Correspondence of microelectrode map** with magnetic resonance imaging for subthalamic nucleus procedures. Surg Neurol 63:249–253
Lozano AM, Hutchison WD, Tasker RR et al (1998) Microelectrode recordings define the ventral posteromedial pallidotomy target. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 71:153–163
Interessenkonflikt
Der korrespondierende Autor weist auf folgende Beziehungen hin: Referententätigkeit für die Fa. Medtronic, Minneapolis, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Anhang
Anhang
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Voges, J., Kiening, K., Krauss, J. et al. Neurochirurgische Standards bei tiefer Hirnstimulation. Nervenarzt 80, 666–672 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-009-2698-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-009-2698-0