Abstract
Wood from construction and demolition waste (CDW) can be incorporated into composites to produce new materials, contributing to the mitigation of environmental impacts. The objective of this work is to compare the particle size distribution (PSD) of wood particles of plywood, Eucalyptus spp. and Pinus spp., obtained by recycling CDW with the PSD curves proposed by particle packing models described in the literature. Three particle packing models were used for the comparison: the Fuller curve, the Andreasen model and the modified Andreasen model. All three models should represent an ideal PSD used as goal to be achieved. The packing density of these PSD curves was calculated using the Compressible Packing Model (CPM) and measured experimentally. When comparing the experimental PSD of the wood particles to the PSD from the packing models, the results demonstrated that they do not fit exactly. This was expected and since wood particles present unique morphology characteristics, it is possible that an ideal PSD curve used for concrete (packing density models used were originally proposed for the use in concrete technology field) is different from an ideal PSD to be used for wood composites. Thus, packing density determination is needed. The PSD curve from the modified Andreasen model provided higher experimental packing density regardless of wood types. Using particle packing models based on ideal PSD increased the packing density by 19.3% on average, compared with experimental packing density of the individual classes for each wood particle size. This represents savings in the consumption of binder paste when producing mineral composites containing these wood particles using the studied PSD curves.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00107-022-01844-0/MediaObjects/107_2022_1844_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00107-022-01844-0/MediaObjects/107_2022_1844_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00107-022-01844-0/MediaObjects/107_2022_1844_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00107-022-01844-0/MediaObjects/107_2022_1844_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00107-022-01844-0/MediaObjects/107_2022_1844_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00107-022-01844-0/MediaObjects/107_2022_1844_Fig6_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajayi SO, Oyedele LO (2018) Waste-efficient materials procurement for construction projects: a structural equation modelling of critical success factors. Waste Manage 75:60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.025
Andreasen AHM, Andersen J (1930) Über die Beziehung zwischen Kornabstufung und Zwischenraum in Produkten aus losen Körnern (mit einigen Experimenten). Colloid Polym Sci 50(3):217–228
ABNT (2021) NBR 16972: Aggregates - Determination of the unit weight and air-void contents. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, Brazil
Askeland DR, Fulay PP, Wright WJ (2010) The science and engineering of materials. CENGAGE Learning, Stamford
ASTM (2014) C136: standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. American Society For Testing And Materials, West Conshohocken, PA
ASTM (2016) D4442: standard test methods for direct moisture content measurement of wood and wood-based materials. American Society For Testing And Materials, West Conshohocken, PA
ASTM (2017a) C29: standard test method for bulk density (unit weight) and voids in aggregate. American Society For Testing And Materials, West Conshohocken, PA
ASTM (2017b) D2395: standard test methods for density and specific gravity (relative density) of wood and wood-based materials. American Society For Testing And Materials, West Conshohocken, PA
Banihashemi S, Tabadkani A, Hosseini MR (2018) Integration of parametric design into modular coordination: a construction waste reduction workflow. Autom Constr 88:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.026
Campos HF, Rocha TMS, Reus GC, Klein NS, Marques Filho J (2019) Determination of the optimal replacement content of Portland cement by stone powder using particle packing methods and analysis of the influence of the excess water on the consistency of pastes. Rev IBRACON Estrut Mater 12:02. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-41952019000200002
Campos HF, Klein NS, Marques Filho J, Bianchini M (2020a) Low-cement high-strength concrete with partial replacement of Portland cement with stone powder and silica fume designed by particle packing optimization. J Clean Prod 261:121228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121228
Campos HF, Klein NS, Marques Filho J (2020b) Proposed mix design method for sustainable high-strength concrete using particle packing optimization. J Clean Prod 265:121907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121907
De Larrard F (1999) Concrete mixture proportioning: a scientific approach. E & FN Spon, London
De Larrard F, Sedran T (1994) Optimization of ultra-high-performance concrete by the use of a packing model. Cem Concr Res 24(6):997–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(94)90022-1
Di Maria A, Eyckmans J, Van Ancker K (2018) Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making. Waste Manage 75:3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.028
Dobrovolskiene N, Tamosiuniene R, Banaitis A, Ferreira FAF, Banaitiene N, Taujanskaite K, Meidute-Kavaliauskiene I (2019) Develo** a composite sustainability index for real estate projects using multiple criteria decision making. Oper Res Int J 19:617–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-017-0365-y
European Commission (2017) Resource efficient use of mixed wastes improving management of construction and demolition waste - Final report. Brussels
Forest Products Laboratory (2010) Wood handbook—Wood as an engineering material. Forest Products Laboratory, Madison
Fuller WB, Thompson SE (1907) The laws of proportioning concrete. Trans ASCE 59:67–143
Funk JE, Dinger DR (1980) Grinding and particle size distribution studies for coal-water slurries at high solids content. Final Report, Empire State Electric Energy Research Corporation (ESEERCO), New York
Gravelsins RJ (1998) Studies of grinding of wood and bark-wood mixtures with the szego mill. Thesis, Deparment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, p 371
Grazia MT, Sanchez LFM, Romano RCO, Pileggi RG (2019) Investigation of the use of continuous particle packing models (PPMs) on the fresh and hardened properties of low-cement concrete (LCC) systems. Constr Build Mater 195:524–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.051
González WA, Pérez JF, Chapela S, Porteiro J (2018) Numerical analysis of wood biomass packing factor in a fixed-bed gasification process. Renew Energy 121:579–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.057
Hartmann H, Böhm T, Jensen PD, Temmerman M, Rabier F, Golser M (2006) Methods for size classification of wood chips. Biomass Bioenerg 30(11):944–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.06.010
Hermann A, Longaro EA, Lopes da Silva SH, Klein NS (2016) Particle packing of cement and silica fume in pastes using an analytical model. Rev IBRACON Estrut Mater 9:1. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1983-41952016000100004
Höglmeier K, Weber-Blaschke G, Richter K (2013) Potentials for cascading of recovered wood from building deconstruction - a case study for south-east Germany. Resour Conserv Recycl 78:81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.07.004
Horttanainen M, Saastamoinen J, Sarkomaa P (2002) Operational limits of ignition front propagation against airflow in packed beds of different wood fuels. Energy Fuels 16:676–686. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef010209d
Hossain MU, Wang L, Yu IKM, Tsang DCW, Poon C-S (2018) Environmental and technical feasibility study of upcycling wood waste into cement-bonded particleboard. Constr Build Mater 173:474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.066
Hosseini MR, Banihashemi S, Martek I, Golizadeh H, Ghodoosi F (2018) Sustainable delivery of megaprojects in Iran: integrated model of contextual factors. J Manage Eng 34(2):05017011–05017021. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000587
Irizarry R, Chen A, Carwford R, Codan L, Schoell J (2017) Data-driven model and model paradigm to predict 1D and 2D particle size distribution from measured chord-length distribution. Chem Eng Sci 164:202–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.042
Jesen PD, Temmerman M, Westborg S (2011) Internal particle size distribution of biofuel pellets. Fuel 90:980–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.11.029
** R, Li B, Zhou T, Wanatowski D, Piroozfar P (2017) An empirical study of perceptions towards construction and demolition waste recycling and reuse in China. Resour Conserv Recycl 126:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.034
Kern AP, Amor LV, Ângulo SC, Montelongo A (2018) Factors influencing temporary wood waste generation in high-rise building construction. Waste Manage 78:446–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.05.057
Klein NS, Lenz LA, Mazer W (2020) Influence of the granular skeleton packing density on the static elastic modulus of conventional concretes. Constr Build Mater 242:118086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118086
Klein NS, Cavalaro S, Aguado A, Segura I, Toralles B (2016) The wetting water in cement-based materials: modeling and experimental validation. Constr Build Mater 121:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.164
Kock I, Huhn K (2007) Influence of particle shape on the frictional strength of sediments - a numerical case study. Sediment Geol 196(1–4):217–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2006.07.011
Lawson N, Douglas I, Garvin S, McGrath C, Manning D, Vetterlein J (2001) Recycling construction and demolition wastes – a UK perspective. Environ Manage Heal 12(2):146–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/09566160110389898
Lenis YA, Pérez JF, Melgar A (2016) Fixed bed gasification of Jacaranda Copaia wood: effect of packingfactor and oxygen enriched air. Ind Crop Prod 84:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.01.053
Li Y, Chen X, Wang X, Xu Y, Chen P-H (2017) A review of studies on green building assessment methods by comparative analysis. Energ Buildings 146:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.04.076
Londero C, Lenz LA, Dos Santos ÍMR, Klein NS (2017) Determination of the particle packing of granular systems composed with the Brazilian standard sand from IPT: comparison between models for particle size distribution optimization and random compositions. Cerâmica [online] 63(365):22–33. https://doi.org/10.1590/0366-69132017633652018
Londero C, Klein NS, Mazer W (2021) Study of low-cement concrete mix-design through particle packing techniques. J Build Eng 42:103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103071
Lu Z, Hu X, Lu Y (2017) Particle morphology analysis of biomass material based on improved image processing method. Int J Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5840690
Majhi RM, Nayak AN (2020) Production of sustainable concrete utilising high-volume blast furnace slag and recycled aggregate with lime activator. J Clean Prod 255:120188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120188
Manouchehrinejad M, Giesen I, Mani S (2018) Grindability of torrefied wood chips and wood pellets. Fuel Process Technol 182:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.10.015
Masche M, Puig-Amavat M, Jensen PA, Holm JK, Clausen S, Ahrenfeldt J, Henriksen UB (2019) From wood chips to pellets to milled pellets: the mechanical processing pathway of Austrian pine and European beech. Powder Technol 350:134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.002
Miranda LFR, Ângulo SC, Careli ÉD (2009) Recycling of construction and demolition waste in Brazil: 1986–2008. Ambiente Construído 9(1):57–71
Ng R, Shi CWP, Tan HX, Song B (2014) Avoided impact quantification from recycling of wood waste in Singapore: an assessment of pallet made from technical wood versus virgin softwood. J Clean Prod 65:447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.053
Ng T-T, Wei Z, Gang M, **ao-Lin C (2018) Macroscopic and microscopic behaviors of binary mixtures of different particle shapes and particle sizes. Int J Solids Struct 135:74–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.11.011
Park J, Tucker R (2017) Overcoming barriers to the reuse of construction waste material in Australia: a review of the literature. Int J Constr Manag 17(3):228–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1192248
Pavlíková M, Zemanová L, Pokorný J, Záleská M, Jankovský O, Lojka M, Sedmidubský D, Pavlík Z (2018) Valorization of wood chips ash as an eco-friendly mineral admixture in mortar mix design. Waste Manage 80:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.004
Radvilaitè U, Romírez-Gómez A, Rusakevicius D, Kacianauskas R (2018) Semi-analytical models of non-spherical particleshapes using optimised spherical harmonics. Chem Eng Res Des 137:376–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.07.031
Saastamoinen JJ, Horttanainen M, Sarkomaa P (2001) Ignition wave propagation and release of volatiles in beds of wood particles. Combust Sci Technol 164(1):41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102200108935825
Saastamoinen JJ, Taipale R, Horttanainen M, Sarkomaa P (2000) Propagation of the ignition front in beds of wood particles. Combust Flame 123(1–2):214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-2180(00)00144-9
Sackey AK, Smith GD (2010) Characterizing macro-voids of uncompressed mats and finished particleboard panels using response surface methodology and X-ray CT. Holzforschung 64:343–352. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2010.052
Seelen LJH, Padding JT, Kuipers JAM (2018) A granular Discrete Element Method for arbitrary convex particle shapes: Method and packing generation. Chem Eng Sci 189:84–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2018.05.034
SNIC (2019) Technological Cement ROADMAP: Potential for reducing carbon emissions from the Brazilian cement industry by 2050. Sindicato Nacional da Indústria do Cimento, Brazil
Souza AM, Nascimento MF, Almeida DH, Silva DAL, Almeida TH, Christoforo AL, Lahr FAR (2018) Wood-based composite made of wood waste and epoxy based ink-waste as adhesive: a cleaner production alternative. J Clean Prod 193:549–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.087
Tabil LGJ (1996) Binding and pelleting characteristics of alfalfa. Department of Agricultural and Bioresource Engineering, University of Saskatchewan
Tanui JK, Kioni PN, Mirre T, Nowitzki M, Karuri NW (2020) The influence of particle packing density on wood combustion in a fixed bed under oxy-fuel conditions. Energy 194:116863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116863
Tannous K, Lam PS, Sokhansanj S, Grace JR (2013) Physical properties for flow characterization of ground biomass from Douglas Fir wood. Particul Sci Technol 31:291–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2012.732676
Thomas BS (2018) Green concrete partially comprised of rice husk ash as a supplementary cementitious material – a comprehensive review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82(3):3913–3923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.081
Vasic S, Stanzl-Tschegg S (2007) Experimental and numerical investigation of wood fracture mechanisms at different humidity levels. Holzforschung 61:367–374. https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2007.056
Vegas I, Broos K, Nielsen P, Lambertz O, Lisbona A (2015) Upgrading the quality of mixed recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste by using near-infrared sorting technology. Constr Build Mater 75:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.109
Wong HHC, Kwan AKH (2008) Packing density of cementitious materials: Part 1 - measurement using a wet packing method. Mater Struct 41(4):689–701. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9274-5
Yu AB, Standish N (1993) Characterisation of non-spherical particles from their packing behavior. Powder Technol 74:205–2013
Yu R, Spiesz P, Brouwers HJH (2015) Development of an eco-friendly Ultra-High Performance Concrete (UHPC) with efficient cement and mineral admixtures uses. Cem Concr Compos 55:383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.024
Yousuf S, Sanchez LFM, Shammeh SA (2019) The use of particle packing models (PPMs) to design structural low cement concrete as an alternative for construction industry. J Build Eng 25:100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100815
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Postgraduation Program in Civil Engineering at the Federal University of Paraná (PPGEC/UFPR), for the laboratory infrastructure provided, as well as Fundação Araucária and Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personal (CAPES) for financial support through research grants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by TMSR, HFC, NSK and LFRM. The first draft of the manuscript was written by TMSR, HFC, NSK, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rocha, T.M.S., Campos, H.F., Klein, N.S. et al. Study of particle packing of plywood, Eucalyptus spp. and Pinus spp. from construction and demolition waste. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 80, 1235–1246 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-022-01844-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-022-01844-0