Log in

Endourologische Harnsteintherapie

Intervention beim geriatrischen Patienten

  • Fortbildung
  • Harnsteintherapie beim geriatrischen Patienten
  • Published:
Uro-News Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Lieske JC et al. Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: an update. Kidney Int. 2006; 69: 760-4

  2. Penniston KL et al. Development of an instrument to assess the health related quality of life of kidney stone formers. J Urol. 2013; 189: 921-30

  3. Krambeck AE et al. Effect of age on the clinical presentation of incident symptomatic urolithiasis in the general population. J Urol. 2013; 189: 158-64

  4. Sighinolfi MC et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in an elderly population: how to prevent complications and make the treatment safe and effective. J Endourol. 2008; 22: 2223-6

  5. Philippou P et al. Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations. Arab J Urol. 2011; 9: 29-33

  6. Ng CF et al. Is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy the preferred treatment option for elderly patients with urinary stone? A multivariate analysis of the effect of patient age on treatment outcome. BJU Int. 2007; 100: 392-5

  7. Berardinelli F et al. RIRS in the elderly: Is it feasible and safe? Int J Surg. 2017; 42: 147-51

  8. Sharaf A et al. Ureteroscopy in Patients with Bleeding Diatheses, Anticoagulated, and on Anti-Platelet Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature. J Endourol. 2017; 31: 1217-25

  9. Akman T et al. Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis. J Endourol. 2012; 26: 625-9

  10. Hu H et al. Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly. Urolithiasis. 2016; 44: 427-34

  11. Ozgor F et al. Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureterorenoscopy for moderate size renal stones in elderly patients. Med Sci. 2018; 34: 352-6

  12. Morganstern B et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in octogenarians and beyond: How old is too old? Asian J Urol. 2015; 2: 208-13

  13. Nakamon T et al. Outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of elderly and younger patients. Int Braz J Urol. 2013; 39: 692-700

  14. Leavitt DA et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy during uninterrupted aspirin therapy in high-cardiovascular risk patients: preliminary report. Urology. 2014; 84: 1034-8

  15. Patel SR et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy can be safely performed in the high-risk patient. Urology. 2010; 75: 51-5

  16. Unsal A et al. Prediction of morbidity and mortality after percutaneous nephrolithotomy by using the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Urology. 2012; 79: 55-60

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Netsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Netsch, C. Intervention beim geriatrischen Patienten. Uro-News 24, 32–35 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00092-020-4265-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00092-020-4265-8

Navigation