SpringerLink
Log in

Survival and productivity benefits of sociality vary seasonally in the tropical, facultatively eusocial bee Megalopta genalis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tropical habitats are characterized by strong wet and dry seasons, but the effects of seasonality on the costs and benefit of sociality are largely unknown for tropical insects. This is an important gap in our understanding of sociobiology because many social bees and wasps are in the tropics. We found evidence of seasonal effects on the costs and benefits of social and solitary behavior in the tropical sweat bee Megalopta genalis. Productivity, whether measured as brood cell production per nest, or brood cell production per female, was greater in the dry season than the wet, likely reflecting floral resource availability. Per nest productivity was greater in social nests than solitary, but this difference was only significant in the dry season. Conversely, per capita productivity was greater in solitary than social nests, but again only in the dry season. Nest failure rates were also higher in the wet season, although roofs protecting nests from rain did not increase survival, suggesting that increased foraging effort in the face of declining resources rather than wetness per se led to nest failure. Newly initiated nests had higher failure rates than established nests, but these were not affected by season. Social nests collected late in the wet season after reproduction has largely ceased show that M. genalis can live in social groups without reproduction; these bees are likely waiting together until provisioning resumes in the subsequent dry season. Our results suggest that the productivity benefits of social nesting are greatest in the dry season, but that insurance-based benefits to social nesting may be greater in the wet season. This reveals that the costs and benefits underpinning sociality are dynamic across seasons, even in tropical systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brand N, Chapuisat M (2014) Impact of helpers on colony productivity in a primitively eusocial bee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 68:291–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Clouse R (2001) Some effects of group size on the output of beginning nests of Mischocyttarus mexicanus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Fla Entomol 84:418–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison P, Field J (2016) Social polymorphism in the sweat bee Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) calceatum. Insectes Soc 63:327–338

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davison P, Field J (2018) Environmental barriers to sociality in an obligate eusocial sweat bee. Insectes Soc 65:549–559

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eickwort GC, Eickwort KR (1971) Aspects of the biology of Costa Rican halictine bees, II. Dialictus umbripennis and adaptations of its caste structure to different climates. J Kans Entomol Soc 44:343–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Eickwort GC, Eickwort JM, Gordon J, Eickwort MA, Wcislo W (1996) Solitary behavior in a high-altitude population of the social sweat bee Halictus rubicundus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:227–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Paxton RJ, Soro A, Bridge C (2010) Cryptic plasticity underlies a major evolutionary transition. Curr Biol 20:2028–2031

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Field J, Paxton R, Soro A, Craze P, Bridge C (2012) Body size, demography and foraging in a socially plastic sweat bee: a common garden experiment. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66:743–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadagkar R (1990) Evolution of eusociality: the advantage of assured fitness returns. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 329:17–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatchwell BJ, Komdeur J (2000) Ecological constraints, life history traits and the evolution of cooperative breeding. Anim Behav 59:1079–1086

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hogendoorn K, Zammit J (2001) Benefits of cooperative breeding through increased colony survival in an allodapine bee. Insectes Soc 48:392–397

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapheim KM, Smith AR, Nonacs P, Wcislo WT, Wayne RK (2013) Foundress polyphenism and the origins of eusociality in a facultatively eusocial sweat bee, Megalopta genalis (Halictidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67:331–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapheim KM, Nonacs P, Smith AR, Wayne RK, Wcislo WT (2015) Kinship, parental manipulation and evolutionary origins of eusociality. Proc Biol Sci 282:20142886. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.2886

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kocher SD, Paxton RJ (2014) Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees. Apidologie 45:289–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocher SD, Pellissier L, Veller C, Purcell J, Nowak MA, Chapuisat M, Pierce NE (2014) Transitions in social complexity along elevational gradients reveal a combined impact of season length and development time on social evolution. Proc Biol Sci 1:1. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korb J, Heinze J (2008) Ecology of social evolution. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kukuk PF, Ward SA, Jozwiak A (1998) Mutualistic benefits generate an unequal distribution of risky activities among unrelated group members. Naturwissenschaften 85:445–449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh EG (1999) Tropical forest ecology: a view from Barro Colorado Island. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin N, Michener CD (1972) Evolution of sociality in insects. Q Rev Biol 47:131–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD, Lange RB (1958a) Observations on the behavior of Brasilian halictid bees V. Chloralictus. Insectes Soc 5:379–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD, Lange RB (1958b) Observations on the behavior of Brasilian halictid bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) III. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 34:473–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD, Lange RB (1959) Observations on the behavior of Brazilian halictid bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea). IV, Augochloropsis, with notes on extralimital forms. Am Mus Novit 1924:1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD, Seabra CAC (1959) Observations on the behavior of Brasilian halictid bees, VI, tropical species. J Kans Entomol Soc 32:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD, Wille A (1961) The bionomics of a primitively social bee, Lasioglossum inconspicuum. Univ Kansas Sci Bull 42:1123–1202

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller UG (1996) Life history and social evolution of the primitively eusocial bee Augochlorella striata (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 69:116–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer L (1986) Multiple-foundress associations in a temperate population of Halictus ligatus (Hymenoptera; Halictidae). Can J Zool 64:2325–2332

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer L (1993) Multiple foundress associations in sweat bees (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). In: Keller L (ed) Queen number and sociality in insects. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 215–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer L, Jessome V, Lockerbie C, Sampson B (1989) The phenology and social biology of four sweat bees in a marginal environment: Cape Breton Island. Can J Zool 67:2871–2877

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell J (2011) Geographic patterns in the distribution of social systems in terrestrial arthropods. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 86:475–491

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1989) The evolution of eusociality: reproductive head starts of workers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:3224–3226. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.86.9.3224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Queller DC (1994) Extended parental care and the origin of eusociality. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 256:105–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards MH (2004) Annual and social variation in foraging effort of the obligately eusocial sweat bee, Halictus ligatus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). J Kans Entomol Soc 77:484–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards MH, Packer L (1995) Annual variation in survival and reproduction of the primitively eusocial sweat bee Halictus ligatus (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Can J Zool 73:933–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards MH, French D, Paxton RJ (2005) It’s good to be queen: classically eusocial colony structure and low worker fitness in an obligately social sweat bee. Mol Ecol 14:4123–4133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richards MH, Onuferko TM, Rehan SM (2015) Phenological, but not social, variation associated with climate differences in a eusocial sweat bee, Halictus ligatus, nesting in southern Ontario. J Hymenopt Res 43:19–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW, Wolda H (2001) Do competing honey bees matter? Dynamics and abundance of native bees before and after honey bee invasion. Popul Ecol 43:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami SF (1977) Seasonal change of nest survival and related aspects in an aggregation of Lasioglossum duplex (Dalla Torre), a eusocial halictine bee (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Res Popul Ecol 19:69–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami SF, Fukuda H (1989) Nest founding and nest survival in a eusocial halictine bee, Lasioglossum duplex: additional observations. Res Popul Ecol 31:139–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami SF, Hayashida K (1968) Bionomics and sociology of the summer matrifilial phase in the social halictine bee, Lasioglossum duplex. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ Ser 6 Zool 16:413–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakagami SF, Munakata M (1972) Distribution and bionomics of a transpalaearctic eusocial halictine bee, Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) calceatum, in northern Japan, with reference to its solitary life cycle at high altitude. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ Ser 6 Zool 18:411–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz M, Bull N, Hogendoorn K (1998) Evolution of sociality in the allodapine bees: a review of sex allocation, ecology and evolution. Insectes Soc 45:349–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz MP, Richards MH, Danforth BN (2007) Changing paradigms in insect social evolution: insights from halictine and allodapine bees. Annu Rev Entomol 52:127–150

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AR, Wcislo WT, O’Donnell S (2003) Assured fitness returns favor sociality in a mass-provisioning sweat bee, Megalopta genalis (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AR, Wcislo WT, O’Donnell S (2007) Survival and productivity benefits to social nesting in the sweat bee Megalopta genalis (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:1111–1120

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AR, Wcislo WT, O’Donnell S (2008) Body size shapes caste expression, and cleptoparasitism reduces body size in the facultatively eusocial bees Megalopta (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). J Insect Behav 21:394–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AR, Kapheim KM, O’Donnell S, Wcislo WT (2009) Social competition but not subfertility leads to a division of labour in the facultatively social sweat bee Megalopta genalis (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Anim Behav 78:1043–1050

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AR, Lopez Quintero IJ, Moreno Patino JE, Roubik DW, Wcislo WT (2012) Pollen use by Megalopta sweat bees in relation to resource availability in a tropical forest. Ecol Entomol 37:309–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Harper C, Kapheim K, Simons M, Kingwell C, Wcislo W (2018) Effects of social organization and resource availability on brood parasitism in the facultatively social nocturnal bee Megalopta genalis. Insectes Soc 65:85–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Kapheim K, Kingwell C, Wcislo W (2019) A split sex ratio in solitary and social nests of a facultatively social bee. Biol Lett 15:20180740

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Staab M, Pufal G, Tscharntke T, Klein A (2018) Trap nests for bees and wasps to analyse trophic interactions in changing environments—A systematic overview and user guide. Methods Ecol Evolut 9:2226–2239

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohm E, Bordon-Hauser A (2003) Advantages and disadvantages of large colony size in a halictid bee: the queen’s perspective. Behav Ecol 14:546–553

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney SM, Fischer CN, Rehan S, Kapheim KM, Wcislo WT (2013) Frequency of social nesting in the sweat bee Megalopta genalis (Halictidae) does not vary across a rainfall gradient, despite disparity in brood production and body size. Insectes Soc 60:163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Wcislo WT (1997) Behavioral environments of sweat bees (Halictinae) in relation to variability in social organization. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 316–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Wcislo W, Gonzalez V (2006) Social and ecological contexts of trophallaxis in facultatively social sweat bees, Megalopta genalis and M. ecuadoria (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). Insectes Soc 53:220–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Wcislo WT, Wille A, Orozco E (1993) Nesting biology of tropical solitary and social sweat bees, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi Wcislo and L. (D.) aeneiventre (Friese)(Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Insectes Soc 40:21–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Wcislo WT, Arneson L, Roesch K, Gonzalez V, Smith A, Fernández H (2004) The evolution of nocturnal behaviour in sweat bees, Megalopta genalis and M. ecuadoria (Hymenoptera: Halictidae): an escape from competitors and enemies? Biol J Linn Soc 83:377–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Wille A, Orozco E (1970) The life cycle and behavior of the social bee Lasioglossum (Dialictus) umbripenne (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). Rev Biol Trop 17:199–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H (1988) Insect seasonality: why? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H, Roubik DW (1986) Nocturnal bee abundance and seasonal bee activity in a Panamanian forest. Ecology 67:426–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright SJ, Calderon O (1995) Phylogenetic patterns among tropical flowering phenologies. J Ecol 83:937–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagi N, Hasegawa E (2011) Both cooperation and nest position improve larval survival in the sweat bee, Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) baleicum. J Ethol 29:63–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammit J, Hogendoorn K, Schwarz M (2008) Strong constraints to independent nesting in a facultatively social bee: quantifying the effects of enemies-at-the-nest. Insectes Soc 55:74–78

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff of BCI field station and numerous field assistants for enabling our research. Callum Kingwell’s comments improved an early draft of the manuscript. The authors are supported by NSF Grant #17-1028536545. WW was supported by general research funds from STRI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA

    A. R. Smith

  2. Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA

    K. M. Kapheim

  3. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama

    W. T. Wcislo

Authors
  1. A. R. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. M. Kapheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. W. T. Wcislo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. R. Smith.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3408 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, A.R., Kapheim, K.M. & Wcislo, W.T. Survival and productivity benefits of sociality vary seasonally in the tropical, facultatively eusocial bee Megalopta genalis. Insect. Soc. 66, 555–568 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-019-00713-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-019-00713-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation