Abstract
Damming a stream inserts a lentic system (an impoundment or reservoir) into a lotic system, changing downstream hydrological, biogeochemical, and ecological processes. One such ecological effect of damming is to create a resource subsidy of easily captured and consumed zooplankton, which are preyed upon by filter-feeders and visual predators. In this study, we sought to predict the density of lentic zooplankton subsidizing downstream habitats using water quality parameters as an alternative to microscopy. We monitored zooplankton subsidy from 4 polymictic reservoirs over 3 summers and assessed 22 water quality variables for their ability to predict subsidies, ultimately finding that about half (48.3%) of the variation in zooplankton subsidy can be predicted using the water quality variables we assessed. While this level of variation explained is not sufficient to replace traditional microscopy for quantifying zooplankton density, conductivity stood out as an important and potentially useful predictor of zooplankton subsidy, and so might be very useful as a screening tool for identifying lentic–lotic transitions with higher subsidies. We also detected three different water quality regimes (high conductivity, high-colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM), and a remaining category) during the study, with differences in the density of zooplankton among these water quality regimes, suggesting that the reservoir’s water quality does impact downstream zooplankton subsidy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data used to produce this work will be published with Dryad on acceptance.
References
Andersen T, Carstensen J, Hernandez-Garcia E, Duarte CM (2009) Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification. Tree 24(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.014
Banerjee A, Chakrabarty M, Rakshit N, Bhowmick AR, Ray S (2019) Environmental factors as indicators of dissolved oxygen concentration and zooplankton abundance: deep learning versus traditional regression approach. Ecol Indic 100:99–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.051
Barbosa FAR, Padisák J, Espíndola ELG, Borics G, Rocha O (1999) The cascading reservoir continuum concept (CRCC) and its application to the River Tietê-basin, São Paulo State, Brazil. In: Tundisi JG, Straškraba M (eds) Theoretical reservoir ecology and its application. International Institute of Ecology, São Carlos, pp 425–437 (Brazilian Academy of Sciences (Rio de Janiero, Brazil), and Backhuys Publishers (Leiden, The Netherlands))
Bazzuri ME, Gabellone NA, Solari LC (2020) Zooplankton-population dynamics in the Salado-River basin (Buenos Aires, Argentina) in relation to hydraulic works and resulting wetland function. Aquat Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-020-00720-4
Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2018) Numerical ecology with R. Springer International Publishing, Geneva
Bos DG, Cumming BF, Watters CE, Smol JP (1996) The relationship between zooplankton, conductivity, and lake-water ionic composition in 111 lakes from the Interior Plateau of British Columbia. Canada Int J Salt Lake Res 5:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003542709450
Burdis RM, Hirsch JK (2017) Crustacean zooplankton dynamics in a natural riverine lake, Upper Mississippi River. J Freshw Ecol 32(1):240–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.2017.1279080
Chang KH, Doi H, Imai H, Gunji F, Nakano S (2008) Longitudinal changes in zooplankton distribution below a reservoir outfall with reference to river planktivory. J Limnol 9:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-008-0244-6
Cole GA, Weihe PE (2016) Textbook of limnology 5e. Waveland Press, Long Grove
Cory RM, Davis TW, Dick GJ, Johengent T, Denef VJ, Berry MA, Page SE, Watson SB, Yuhas K, Kling GW (2016) Seasonal dynamics in dissolved organic matter, hydrogen peroxide, and cyanobacterial Blooms in Lake Erie. Front Mar Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00054
Cottenie K, Nuytten N, Michels E, De Meester L (2001) Zooplankton community structure and environmental conditions in a set of interconnected ponds. Hydrobiologia 442:399–350. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017505619088
Covino T (2017) Hydrologic connectivity as a framework for understanding biogeochemical flux through watersheds and along fluvial networks. Geomorphology 277:133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.09.030
Czerniawski R, Domagała J (2014) Small dams profoundly alter the spatial and temporal composition of zooplankton communities in running waters. Hydrobiology 99(4):300–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.201301674
Czerniawski R, Pilecka-Rapacz M, Domagala J (2013) Zooplankton communities of inter-connected sections of lower River Oder (NW Poland). Cent Eur J Biol 8(1):18–29. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-012-0110-8
da Rosa LM, Cardoso LD, Rodrigues LR, da Motta-Marques D (2021) Density versus biomass responses of zooplankton to environmental variability in a subtropical shallow lake. Inland Waters 11(1):44–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/20442041.2020.1714383
de Paggi SBJ, Devercelli M (2011) Land use and basin characteristics determine the composition and abundance of the microzooplankton. Wat Air and Soil Poll 218(1–4):93–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0626-3
Dodson SI, Newman AL, Will-Wolf S, Alexander ML, Woodford MP, Egeren S (2009) The relationship between zooplankton community structure and lake characteristics in temperate lakes (Northern Wisconsin, USA). J Plankton Res 31(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbn095
Doi H, Chang KH, Ando T, Imai H, Nakano S, Kajimoto A, Katano I (2008) Drifting plankton from a reservoir subsidize downstream food webs and alter community structure. Oecologia 156:363–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-0988-z
Ellis LE, Jones NE (2013) Longitudinal trends in regulated rivers: a review and synthesis within the context of the serial discontinuity concept. Environ Rev 21(3):136–148. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2012-0064
Eriksson AI (2001) Longitudinal changes in the abundance of filter feeders and zooplankton in lake-outlet streams in northern Sweden. Ann Limnol 37(3):199–209. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2001017
Garćia-Chicote J, Armengol X, Rojo C (2018) Zooplankton abundance: a neglected key element in the evaluation of reservoir water quality. Limnologica 69:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2017.11.004
Ger KA, Urrutia-Cordero P, Frost PC, Hansson LA, Sarnelle O, Wilson AE, Lürling M (2016) The interaction between cyanobacteria and zooplankton in a more eutrophic world. Harmful Algae 54:128–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2015.12.005
Grill G, Lehner B, Thieme M, Geenen B, Tickner D, Antonelli F, Babu S, Borrelli P, Cheng L, Crochetiere H, Macedo HE, Filgueiras R, Goichot M, Higgins J, Hogan Z, Lip B, McClain ME, Meng J, Mulligan M, Nilsson C, Olden JD, Opperman JJ, Petry P, Liermann CR, Saenz L, Salinas-Rodriguez S, Schelle P, Schmitt RJP, Snider J, Tan F, Tockner K, Valdujo PH, van Soesbergen A, Zerfl C (2019) Map** the world’s free-flowing rivers. Nature 569(7755):215–221. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1111-9
Helmus MR, Mercado-Silva N, Vander-Zanden MJ (2013) Subsidies to predators, apparent competition and the phylogenetic structure of prey communities. Oecologia 173(3):997–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2661-4
Hutchinson GE (1957) A treatise on limnology, volume 1: geography, physics, and chemistry. Wiley, New York
JMP (2020) Version 14. SAS Institute Inc., Cary
Jones NE (2010) Incorporating lakes within the river discontinuum: longitudinal changes in ecological characteristics in stream-lake networks. Can J Fish Aquat 67(8):1350–1362. https://doi.org/10.1139/F10-069
Kimmel BL, Lind OT, Paulson LJ (1990) Reservoir primary productivity. In: Thornton KW, Kimmel BL, Payne FE (eds) Reservoir limnology: ecological perspectives. Wiley, New York
Lansac-Toha FA, Bini LM, Velho LFM, Bonecker CC, Takahashi EM, Vieira LCG (2008) Temporal coherence of zooplankton abundance in a tropical reservoir. Hydrobiologia 614(1):387–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-008-9526-6
Lehner B, Liermann CR, Revenga C, Vörösmaty C, Fekete B, Crouzet P, Döll P, Endejan M, Frenken K, Magome J, Nilsson C, Roberston JC, Rödel R, Sindorf N, Wisser D (2011) High-resolution map** of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river-flow management. Front Ecol Environ 9(9):494–502. https://doi.org/10.1890/100125
Liebig JR, Vanderploeg HA, Ruberg SA (2006) Factors affecting the performance of the optical plankton counter in large lakes: insights from Lake Michigan and laboratory studies. J Geophys Res 111(C5):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003087
Marcarelli AM, Baxter CV, Mineau MM, Hall RO (2011) Quantity and quality: unifying food web and ecosystem perspectives on the role of resource subsidies in freshwaters. Ecology 92(6):1215–1225. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-2240.1
Marzolf GR (1990) Reservoirs as environments for zooplankton. In: Thornton KW, Kimmel BL, Payne FE (eds) Reservoir limnology: ecological perspectives. Wiley, New York
Merrix-Jones FL, Thackeray SJ, Ormerod SJ (2013) A global analysis of zooplankton in natural and artificial fresh waters. J Limnol 72(1):140–153. https://doi.org/10.4081/jlimnol.2013.e12
Montagud D, Soria JM, Soria-Perpiñà X, Alfonso T, Vicente E (2019) A comparative study of four indexes based on zooplankton as trophic state indicators in reservoirs. Limnetica 38(1):291–302. https://doi.org/10.23818/limn.38.06
Mosley LM (2015) Drought impacts on the water quality of freshwater systems; review and integration. Earth Sci Rev 140:203–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.010
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) (2022). https://www.nj.gov/dep/fgw/ensphome.htm. Accessed 4 Aug 2022
Ock G, Takemon Y (2014) Effect of reservoir-derived plankton released from dams on particulate organic matter composition in a tailwater river (Uji River, Japan): source partitioning using stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen. Ecohydrology 7(4):1172–1186. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1448
Picapedra P, Fernandes C, Taborda J, Baumgartner G, Sanches P (2020) A long-term study on zooplankton in two contrasting cascade reservoirs (Iguacu ̧River, Brazil): effects of inter-annual, seasonal, and environmental factors. PeerJ 8:e8979. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8979
R Core Team (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, v4.0.2. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
Richardson J, Mackay R (1991) Lake outlets and the distribution of filter feeders—an assessment of hypotheses. Aquat Biol 62(3):370–380. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545503
RStudio Team (2020) RStudio: Integrated Development for R, v3.6. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/
Ruhl N, Haban D, Czajkowski C, Grove M, Richmond CE (2019) Community composition of zooplankton exported from a shallow polymictic reservoir linked to wind conditions. PeerJ 7:e7611. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7611
Sitters J, Atkinson CL, Guelzow N, Kelly P, Sullivan LL (2015) Spatial stoichiometry: cross-ecosystem material flows and their impact on recipient ecosystems and organisms. Oikos 124(7):920–930. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.02392
Soto D, Rios P (2006) Influence of trophic status and conductivity on zooplankton composition in lakes and ponds of Torres del Paine National Park (Chile). Biologia 61(5):541–546. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-006-0088-7
Subalusky AL, Post DM (2019) Context dependency of animal resource subsidies. Biol Rev 94(2):517–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12465
United States Geological Survey (2016) The StreamStats program. http://streamstats.usgs.gov. Accessed 2020.
Vannote R, Minshall G, Cummins K, Sedell J, Cushing C (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat 37:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1139/f80-017
Vega M, Pardo R, Barrado E, Deban L (1998) Assessment of seasonal and polluting effects on the quality of river water by exploratory data analysis. Water Res 32(12):3581–3592. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00138-9
Walks DJ, Cyr H (2004) Movement of plankton through lake-stream systems. Freshw Biol 49(6):745–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2004.01220.x
Ward JV, Stanford JA (1983) The serial discontinuity concept of lotic ecosystems. In: Fontaine TD, Bartell SM (eds) Dynamics of lotic ecosystems. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank all of the undergraduate members of the Ecological Diversity Group at Rowan University that contributed to the data collection for this study, particularly Frank Rollo, who compiled the lake statistics and was initially involved in writing this manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded by Rowan University and with personal funds by Nathan Ruhl, Michael Grove, and Courtney Richmond.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
NR, MG, and CR contributed to the study conception and design. NR, DR, MG and CR contributed to field sampling and data collection in the lab. NR, CR, DR, and SI conducted the statistical analyses, produced the figures, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Nathan Ruhl declares that he is a consultant to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and New Jersey Sea Grant Consortium for the management of cyanobacterial blooms in inland waters within the state. The authors declare that there are no other competing interests.
Research compliance
This research was conducted according to applicable research policies of Rowan University and laws of the state of New Jersey.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ruhl, N., Ruggiero, D., Iuliucci, S. et al. Predicting the density of zooplankton subsidy to a stream with multiple impoundments using water quality parameters. Aquat Sci 85, 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-022-00931-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-022-00931-x