Abstract
Objective: Liquid-based cytology using the thin layer technique has recently been introduced in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology together with or in substitution of direct smears, but its usefulness is still controversial and relatively few studies have been published in this field. The aim of the present study was to compare the results obtained from conventional smears with those from thin layer smears. Design: In 3875 thyroid nodules, a double cytologic sampling was taken in randomized order, to prepare conventional or thin layer smears. Main outcome: The diagnoses agreed in 2934 (75.7%) cases and disagreed in 941 (24.3%). The analysis of discordant data showed there were fewer non-diagnostic cases in the thin layer smears (377 vs 541, p<0.001) whereas in conventional smears there were more cases positive for carcinoma (27 vs 4, p<0.001). The cytohistologic correlation was available for 194 cases and showed that conventional smears had a greater capacity for revealing carcinomas (44 vs 31). Finally, diagnoses based on conventional smears were more sensitive than thin layer smears (93.6% vs 65.9%) whereas specificity was constant. Conclusions: From our experience, the conventional smear offers a greater possibility of diagnosis when suspecting malignancy or diagnosing malignancy cases, whereas thin layer smears significantly reduce the number of non-diagnostic cases. For this reason, we suggest combining the two techniques in routine cytologic diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ridgway EC. Clinical review 30: Clinician’s evaluation of a solitary thyroid nodule. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992, 74: 231–5.
Gharib H, Goellner JR. Fine-needle aspiration of the thyroid: an appraisal. Ann Intern Med 1993, 118: 282–9.
Mazzaferri EL. Management of a solitary thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med 1993, 328: 553–9.
El Hag IA, Kollur SM, Chiedozi LC. The role of FNA in the initial management of thyroid lesions: 7-year experience in a district general hospital. Cytopathology 2003, 14: 126–30.
Gharib H, Goellner JR, Zinsmeister AR, Grant CS, Van Heerder JA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: The problem of suspicious cytologic finding. Ann Intern Med 1984, 101: 25–8.
Hamburger JI. Consistency of sequential needle biopsy findings for thyroid nodules. Management implications. Arch Intern Med 1987, 147: 97–9.
Goellner JR, Gharib H, Grant CS, Johnson DA. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid, 1980 to 1986. Acta Cytol 1987, 31: 587–90.
Hall TL, Layfield LJ, Philippe6A, Rosenthal DL. Sources of diagnostic error in fine needle aspiration of the thyroid. Cancer 1989, 63:718–25.
Caraway NP, Sneige N, Samaan NA. Diagnostic pitfalls in thyroid fine-needle aspiration: A review of 394 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1993, 9: 345–50.
Rodriguez JM, Parrilla P, Sola J, et al. Comparison between preoperative cytology and intraoperative frozen section in the diagnosis of thyroid nodule. Br J Surg 1994, 81: 1151–4.
Tyler DS, Winchester DJ, Caraway NP, Hickey RC, Evans DB. Indeterminate fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: identification of subgroups at high risk for invasive carcinoma. Surgery 1994, 116: 1054–60.
Schlinkert RT, Van Heerden JA, Goellner JR, et al. Factors that predict malignant thyroid lesions when fine-needle aspirationis “suspicious for follicular neoplasm”. Mayo Clin Proc 1997, 72: 913–6.
Tuttle RM, Lemar H, Burch HB. Clinical features associated with an increased risk of thyroid malignancy in patients with follicular neoplasia by fine-needle aspiration. Thyroid 1998, 8: 377–83.
Cáp J, Ryska A, Rehorková P, Hovorková E, Kerekes Z, Pohnetalová D. Sensitivity and specificity of the needle as-pitation biopsy of the thyroid: clinical point of view. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1999, 51: 509–15.
Pisani T, Bononi M, Nagar C, Angelini M, Bezzi M, Vecchione A. Fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of nodular thyroid pathologies. Anticancer Res 2000, 20: 3843–7.
Leung CS, Chiu B, Bell V. Comparison of Thin Prep and conventional preparations: nongynecologic evaluation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997, 16: 368–71.
Mesonero CE, Sickel J. Thyroid fine needle aspiration: a comparison of thin-layer slide preparation with conventional smears. Acta Cytol 1993, 37: 795.
Biscotti CV, Hollow JA, Toddy SM, Easley KA. ThinPrep versus conventional smear cytologic preparations in the analysis of thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1995, 104: 150–3.
Frost AR, Sidawy MK, Ferfelli M. Utility of thin-layer preparations in thyroid fine-needle aspiration: diagnostic accuracy, cytomorphology, and optimal sample preparation. Cancer 1998, 84: 17–25.
Scurry JP, Duggan MA. Thin-layer compared to direct smear in thyroid fine needle aspiration. Cytopathology 2000, 11: 104–15.
Afify AM, Liu J, Al-Khafaji BM. Cytologic artifacts and pitfalls of thyroid fine-needle aspiration using ThinPrep: a comparative retrospective review. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2001, 93: 179–86.
Cochand-Priollet B, Prat JJ, Polivka M, et al. Thyroid fine needle aspiration: the morphological features on ThinPrep slide preparations. Eighty cases with histological control. Cytopathology 2003, 14: 343–9.
Zhang Y, Fraser JL, Wang HH. Morphologic predictors of papillary carcinoma on fine-needle aspiration of thyroid with ThinPrep preparation. Diagn Cytopathol 2001, 24: 378–83.
Malle D, Valeri RM, Pazaitou-Panajiotou K, Kiziridou A, Vainas I, Destouni. Use of thin-layer technique in thyroid fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2006, 50: 23–7.
ThinPrep 2000 operator’s manual. Boxborough, Massachusett: Cytyc Corporation, 1995.
British Thyroid Association — Royal College of Physicians: Fine needle aspiration cytoiogy (FNAC). In: Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer in adults. London: Royal College of Physicians. 2002, 7–8.
Tulecke MA, Wang HH. ThinPrep for cytologic evaluation of follicular thyroid lesions: Correlation with histologie findings. Diagn Cytopathol 2004, 30: 7–13.
Fadda G, Rossi ED, Raffaelli M, et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid lesions processed by thin-layer citology: one-year institutional experience with histologie correlation. Thyroid 2006, 16: 975–81.
Marino C, Martinelli M, Monacelli G, et al. Evaluation of goiter using ultrasound criteria: a survey in a middle schoolchildren population of a mountain area in Central Italy. J Endocrinol Invest 2006, 29: 869–75.
Michael CW, Hunter B. Interpretation of fine-needle asperates processed by the ThinPrep technique: cytologie artifacts and diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 2000, 23: 6–13.
Hees K, Lebeau PB. Comparison of conventional and ThinPrep preparations of mucoid cytology samples. Diagn Cytopathol 1995, 12: 181–5.
Lee KR, Papillo JL, St John T, Eyerer GJ. Evaluation of the ThinPrep processor for fine needle aspiration specimens. Acta Cytol 1996, 40: 895–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cavaliere, A., Colella, R., Puxeddu, E. et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules: Conventional vs thin layer technique. J Endocrinol Invest 31, 303–308 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03346362
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03346362