Abstract
This paper proposes an improved non-repudiation protocol after pointing out two attacks on an existing non-repudiation protocol. To analyze the improved protocol, it also proposes an extension of Kailar logic. Using the extended Kailar logic, the security analysis of the improved prototocol has been presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Even S, Goldreich O, Lempel A. A Randomized Protocol for Signing Contracts.Communications of the ACM, 1985,28 (6): 637–647.
Okamoto T, Ohta K. How to Simultaneously Exchange Secrets by General Assumptions.Proceedings of 2nd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security. New York: ACM Press, 1994. 184–192.
Zhou J, Gollmann D. A Fair Non-Repudiation Protocol.Proceedings of 1996 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy. Oakland: IEEE Computer Society, 1996. 55–61.
Li **an-xian, Huai **-peng. A Fair Non-Repudiation Cryptographic Protocol and Its Formal Analysis and Applications.Journal of Software, 2000,11(12): 1628–1634 (Ch).
Kim K, Park S, Baek J. Improving Fairness and Privacy of Zhou-Gollmann's Fair Non-Repudiation Protocol.Proceeding of 1999 ICPP Workshops on Security. Wakamatsu: IEEE Computer Society, 1999. 140–145.
Kailar R. Accountability in Electronic Commerce Protocols.IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 1996,8(1): 18–36.
Zhou Zhan-fei, Zhou Dian-cui, Wang Gui-lin,et al. Fairness in Electronic Commerce Protocols.ACTA Electronica Since, 2000,28(9): 13–15 (Ch).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Foundation item: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (90104005) and the Doctoral Science Foundation of Ministry of Education (20020486046)
Biography: Li Li(1976-), female, Ph. D candidate, research direction: network security and formal analysis of security protocol.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, L., Huan-guo, Z. & Li-na, W. An improved non-repudiation protocol and its security analysis. Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 9, 288–292 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907880
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907880