Log in

Ethnobotany of the Sumu (Ulwa) of southeastern Nicaragua and comparisons with Miskitu plant lore

La EtnobotÁNica de los Sumu (Ulwa) del Sudeste de Nicaragua y Comparaciones Con El Saber BotÁNico De Los Miskitus

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Sumu (Ulwa) are one of three Amerindian groups of eastern Nicaragua. Their uses of 225 species of plants in 174 genera and 72 families were documented in two years of fieldwork. Included are 187 medicinals, 69 food plants, and 84 for other uses. Ulwa medicinals treat more than 25 human ailments, and most (80%) are native to eastern Nicaragua. Over 70% of the medicinals have a recognized bioactive principle, most are herbs (48%) or trees (33%). Leaves are the most frequently utilized plant part. Most medicinals are prepared as decoctions and are administered orally. Almost half of Ulwa food plants are domesticates, but only six are native to the New World tropics. Comparison of plant use between the Ulwa and southern Miskitu indicated that most of the species used for food (98%), medicinals (90%), and medicinal applications (80%) are the same. The Miskitu use more species, have a wider range of medicinal applications, and more unique plant uses than the Ulwa, presumably due to their larger territory. Differences in ethnobotanical usage between these groups seem to be more a reflection of scale than of remnants of cultural differences.

Resumen

Los Sumu (Ulwa) constituyen uno de los tres grupos Amerindios del oriente Nicaragüense. Durante dos años de estudios se documentaron los usos por éste grupo de 225 especies vegetales en 174 géneros y 72 familias. Incluyendo 187 especies medicinales, 69 especies alimenticias y 84 especies para usos auxiliares. Las plantas medicinales de los Ulwa tratan más de 25 enfermedades y la mayoría (80%) son especies nativas del oriente Nicaragüense. Más del 70% de las especies medicinales poseen algún principio bioactivo; la mayoría son hierbas (48%) o árboles (33%). Las hojas son las partes más frecuentemente utilizadas en remedios y son preparados en forma de decocciónes y administradas oralmente. Las plantas comestibles en su mayoría son domesticadas, solamente seis son nativas del neotrópico. Comparaciones de las plantas usadas por los Ulwa y Miskitu demuestran que la mayoria de las especies usadas como alimentos (98%), medicinas (90%) y aplicaciones medicinales (80%) son iguales. Los Miskitu usan un mayor número de especies, con un mayor rango de aplicaciones medicinales y mas usos singulares de plantas que los Ulwa, presumiblemente debido a su territorio mas extenso. Diferencias etnobotánicas parecen ser mas bien consecuencia de escala y no vestigios de diferencias culturales. We dedicate this paper to Charles B. Heiser who has inspired so many to study the relationships between plants and people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Barrett, B. 1994. Medicinal plants of Nicaragua’s Atlantic Coast. Economic Botany 48:8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. N. 1989. Tangweera: life and adventures among gentle savages. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX. (Originally published in 1899). Boom, B. M. 1987. Ethnobotany of the Chácobo Indians, Beni, Bolivia. Advances in Economic Botany 4:1-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambie, R. C, and J. E. Ash. 1994. Fijian medicinal plants. CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIDCA (Centra de Investigatión y Documentatión de la Costa Atlántica). 1982. Demografía Costeña. CIDCA, Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1985. Gramática Miskita. MIDNIRA, Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1986. Diccionario Elemental: Miskito-Español/ Español-Miskito. Editado e impreso en MIDNIRA, Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. Diccionario elemental del Sumu: Sumu Meridional. Centra de Ciencia Cognitiva, Instituto Tecnológico de Massachusetts, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, F. G. 1994. Ethnobotany of the Garífuna of eastern Nicaragua. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and G. J. Anderson. 1996a. Ethnobotany of the Garífuna of eastern Nicaragua. Economic Botany 50:71–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,and —. 1996b. Screening of medicinal plants used by the Garífuna of eastern Nicaragua. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 53:29–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —,and —. 1997. Ethnobotany of the Miskitu of eastern Nicaragua. Journal of Ethnobiology 17:171–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conzemius, E. 1932. Ethnographical survey of the Miskito and Sumu Indians of Honduras and Nicaragua. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin No. 106. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, P. A. 1988. Herbal medicine among the Miskito of eastern Nicaragua. Economic Botany 42: 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, C. L. 1985. Nicaragua’s Moskito shore: the years of British and American presence. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, J. A. 1994. Chemical composition of Belizean plants discussed in rainforest remedies: one hundred healing herbs of Belize. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fey, U., and M. Sindel. 1993. Plantas medicinales de los Sumus. Imprenta Universidad Centroamericana (UCA), Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Barriga, H. 1992. Flora medicinal de Colombia. Tomo I–III. Tercer Mundo Editores, Bogotá, Colombia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, T. 1997. Neologismos en el idioma Sumu (Sumu Meridional). Wani 21:41–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, J. N., and L. Soriano de Guerrero. 1985. Diccionario Nicaragüense: geográfico e histórico. Editorial Somarriba, Masaya, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, K. 1991. El Ulwa (Sumu Meridional): un idioma distinto? Wani 11:27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, C., and E. T. Gordon. 1987. Costeño demography: historical and contemporary demography of Nicaragua’s Atlantic Coast. Pages 7–31in CIDCA, ed., Ethnic groups and the nation state: the case of the Atlantic Coast in Nicaragua. University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R. 1962-1994. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen. Vol. 1–1la. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Incer, J. 1975. Geografía ilustrada de Nicaragua. Editora y Distribuidora, Nicaragiiense, S. A., Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1985. Toponomías indígenas de Nicaragua. Libro Libre, San José, Costa Rica.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, M. E. 1996. Diccionario Panamahka. CIDCA, Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. F. 1981. Atlas of medicinal plants of Middle America. Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. Fruits of warm climates. Media Incorporated, Greensboro, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietschmann, B. Q. 1969. The distribution of Miskito, Sumu, and Rama Indians, Eastern Nicaragua. Bulletin of the International Comittee on Urgent Anthropological and Ethnological Research 11:91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1979. Caribbean edge: the coming of modern times to isolated people and wildlife. Bobbs-Merrill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norwood, S. 1997. Gramática de la lengua Sumu. CIDCA-UCA, Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, O. W. 1827. Narrative of voyages and excursions on the East Coast and the Interior of Central America. 1965 reprint, a facsimile of the 1827 edition. University of Florida Press, Gainesville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, G. 1995. Las sociedades del atlántico de Nicaragua en los siglos XVII y XVIII. Banco Nicaragiiense, Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,F. de Oro Solorzano, M. Rizo, M. Membreño, A. Castegnaro de Foletti, J. Avilés, and B. Muñoz. 1992. Persistencia indígena en Nicaragua. CIDCA, Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, E. A. 1950. Plantas económicas y ornamentales de Nicaragua. Imprenta La Salle, Bluefields, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultes, R. E., and F. Raffauf. 1990. The healing forest medicinal and toxic plants of the Northwest Amazonia. Dioscorides Press, Portland, OR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, F. C. 1980. A checklist of the vascular plants of Nicaragua. Phytologia Memoirs l:iii-x, 1-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smutko, G. 1985. La Mosquitia: historia y cultura de la Costa Atlántica. Editorial La Ocarina, Managua, Nicaragua.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B. W. 1962. The status and development of the Nicaraguan pine savannas. Caribbean Forester 23:21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. An outline of the vegetation of Nicaragua. Journal of Ecology 51:27–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, V. E., L. R. Brady, and J. E. Robbers. 1985. Pharmacognosy. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willaman, J. J., and Hui-Lin Li. 1970. Alkaloid- bearing plants and their contained alkaloids. Lloydia 33:1–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • -,and B. G. Schubert. 1961. Alkaloid-bearing plants and their contained alkaloids. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No. 1234, Washington, DC.

  • Williamson, D., J. Avilés, and M. McLean. 1993. Aspectos Generales de las Comunidades Sumus de la RAAN. Wani 14:18–27.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coe, F.G., Anderson, G.J. Ethnobotany of the Sumu (Ulwa) of southeastern Nicaragua and comparisons with Miskitu plant lore. Econ Bot 53, 363–386 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866715

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02866715

Key Words

Navigation